TV Résistance
Connexion
PublicEnquiry
1 Vidéos sur 1 118
(18 635 abonnés 9 898 043 vues 0 Commentaires ) note : 2
Crée le 2008-03-07
| |
Page 1 | Suivant
Page 1 | Suivant
(18 635 abonnés 9 898 043 vues 0 Commentaires ) note : 2
Crée le 2008-03-07
Documentary makers are just about the only public interest investigators left in the NATO zone. From the top down, our mainstream media, police, political parties & intelligence services are being compromised by feudal banksters, secret societies and the mafia. Key people intimidated by psychopathic black magic types and their pliable drones who will even kill to take over positions of power? Just search for "John Scarlett" and "Dodgy Dossier" and you'll see what I mean. The Zionists are every bit as fundamentalist and twisted as the leaders and followers of ISIS. Register here and join us in the discussion as we wriggle free of the psychopaths, back to sanity http://www.911forum.org.uk
| |
Page 1 | Suivant
50 Vidéos Autres Langues
2021-07-07 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 389 votes : 35-1 com : 6 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
UK troops secretly training Saudi backed forces in Yemen Declassified UK | (Y) |
UK troops secretly training Saudi backed forces in Yemen Declassified UK Revealed: UK troops ‘secretly operating in Yemen’ By Naseh Shaker, Phil Miller and Mark Curtis• 6 July 2021 https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-07-06-revealed-uk-troops-secretly-operating-in-yemen/ Britain has a secret detachment of up to 30 troops in Yemen, where they are training Saudi forces amid the world’s worst humanitarian catastrophe, Declassified has discovered. The British personnel are said to be based at Al-Ghaydah airport in Mahra province of eastern Yemen, where Human Rights Watch says Saudi forces run a prison camp in which detainees are subject to torture and extraordinary rendition. British troops are believed to have been based at the airport for months. A local journalist who was embedded with Saudi forces at the airport, Naser Hakem Abdullah Awidh, told Declassified he has seen British troops there this year. He claimed: “They are a fully-fledged force. We can’t say they are minor.” The British forces allegedly spend their days off conducting tourist trips in civilian clothes to local archaeological sites. Hameed Zaabnoot, a tribal sheikh who has led sit-in protests against the presence of Saudi forces in Mahra province, told Declassified that staff at Al-Ghaydah airport have seen British troops inside. Zaabnoot understands that British forces are located in designated parts of the airport. He said: “The tasks assigned to them so far are military training and logistical support, either for Saudi forces or Saudi-backed militia that are elements from the Southern Transitional Council,” a Yemeni separatist group. “The number of British forces… is between 20 and 30 instructors, 10 of which are permanent,” Zaabnoot relayed, claiming they are flown into the airport on board Saudi military aircraft and bypass normal visa checks. “Saudi forces carry out strict security measures against civilian or military personnel inside the airport,” he explained, adding that mobile phones are banned, making it hard for anyone to photograph the British troops. Saudi special forces prepare to unload a C-130 plane at Al-Ghaydah in January 2018. (Photo: Saudi military) British ambassador ‘fighting terrorism’ In an interview in Arabic broadcast late last month by Yemen’s Al-Mahriah TV channel, Britain’s ambassador Michael Aron was repeatedly questioned over allegations that UK forces have been seen in the east of the country. Aron did not deny the allegations, saying, “We support efforts of fighting terrorism and smuggling. This is our position for a long time,” adding that “we have good and deep relations with the legitimate government”. Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) reportedly has a presence in Mahra province, with Saudi and Yemeni forces recently killing or capturing several members of the group. For years following 9/11, the UK’s Foreign Office provided Yemen with counter-terrorism training to deal with AQAP, but instructors officially withdrew in 2015 when the British embassy had to close as the war broke out. US ambassador to Yemen, Christopher Henzel, visited Mahra in December 2020, drawing criticism from Badr Kalashat, a provincial deputy for youth affairs. Kalashat tweeted that Henzel “visited the American and British forces present at Al-Ghaydah airport”, complaining that it coincided with the anniversary of Yemen’s independence from British colonialism. Then in March 2021 the former deputy governor of Mahra province, Sheikh Ali Salem Al-Huraizi, said US and UK troops were present at the airport and called for all foreign forces to leave, denying there was a terrorism threat to the area. Al-Huraizi pledged to “reveal to the world the truth about what is happening in terms of the occupation”. He has since claimed that Saudi and Western forces have built more than 100 underground cells inside the airport. Torture Geneva-based advocacy group, SAM for Rights and Liberties, told Declassified that Yemenis are being tortured by the British-backed Saudi forces at the airport. The group’s president, Tawfiq Alhamidi, said: “Saudi forces operate the airport’s prison where they receive logistical support and military training by British troops stationed at the airport since the beginning of this year.”
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
UK troops secretly training Saudi backed forces in Yemen Declassified UK | (Y) |
UK troops secretly training Saudi backed forces in Yemen Declassified UK Revealed: UK troops ‘secretly operating in Yemen’ By Naseh Shaker, Phil Miller and Mark Curtis• 6 July 2021 https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-07-06-revealed-uk-troops-secretly-operating-in-yemen/ Britain has a secret detachment of up to 30 troops in Yemen, where they are training Saudi forces amid the world’s worst humanitarian catastrophe, Declassified has discovered. The British personnel are said to be based at Al-Ghaydah airport in Mahra province of eastern Yemen, where Human Rights Watch says Saudi forces run a prison camp in which detainees are subject to torture and extraordinary rendition. British troops are believed to have been based at the airport for months. A local journalist who was embedded with Saudi forces at the airport, Naser Hakem Abdullah Awidh, told Declassified he has seen British troops there this year. He claimed: “They are a fully-fledged force. We can’t say they are minor.” The British forces allegedly spend their days off conducting tourist trips in civilian clothes to local archaeological sites. Hameed Zaabnoot, a tribal sheikh who has led sit-in protests against the presence of Saudi forces in Mahra province, told Declassified that staff at Al-Ghaydah airport have seen British troops inside. Zaabnoot understands that British forces are located in designated parts of the airport. He said: “The tasks assigned to them so far are military training and logistical support, either for Saudi forces or Saudi-backed militia that are elements from the Southern Transitional Council,” a Yemeni separatist group. “The number of British forces… is between 20 and 30 instructors, 10 of which are permanent,” Zaabnoot relayed, claiming they are flown into the airport on board Saudi military aircraft and bypass normal visa checks. “Saudi forces carry out strict security measures against civilian or military personnel inside the airport,” he explained, adding that mobile phones are banned, making it hard for anyone to photograph the British troops. Saudi special forces prepare to unload a C-130 plane at Al-Ghaydah in January 2018. (Photo: Saudi military) British ambassador ‘fighting terrorism’ In an interview in Arabic broadcast late last month by Yemen’s Al-Mahriah TV channel, Britain’s ambassador Michael Aron was repeatedly questioned over allegations that UK forces have been seen in the east of the country. Aron did not deny the allegations, saying, “We support efforts of fighting terrorism and smuggling. This is our position for a long time,” adding that “we have good and deep relations with the legitimate government”. Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) reportedly has a presence in Mahra province, with Saudi and Yemeni forces recently killing or capturing several members of the group. For years following 9/11, the UK’s Foreign Office provided Yemen with counter-terrorism training to deal with AQAP, but instructors officially withdrew in 2015 when the British embassy had to close as the war broke out. US ambassador to Yemen, Christopher Henzel, visited Mahra in December 2020, drawing criticism from Badr Kalashat, a provincial deputy for youth affairs. Kalashat tweeted that Henzel “visited the American and British forces present at Al-Ghaydah airport”, complaining that it coincided with the anniversary of Yemen’s independence from British colonialism. Then in March 2021 the former deputy governor of Mahra province, Sheikh Ali Salem Al-Huraizi, said US and UK troops were present at the airport and called for all foreign forces to leave, denying there was a terrorism threat to the area. Al-Huraizi pledged to “reveal to the world the truth about what is happening in terms of the occupation”. He has since claimed that Saudi and Western forces have built more than 100 underground cells inside the airport. Torture Geneva-based advocacy group, SAM for Rights and Liberties, told Declassified that Yemenis are being tortured by the British-backed Saudi forces at the airport. The group’s president, Tawfiq Alhamidi, said: “Saudi forces operate the airport’s prison where they receive logistical support and military training by British troops stationed at the airport since the beginning of this year.”
Voir plus
2021-07-03 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 420 votes : 31-0 com : 11 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
US 'Airstrikes For God' on Iraq & Syria Break International Law, Signal 2012 Crusader Policy 03 | (Y) | | |
US 'Airstrikes For God' on Iraq & Syria Break International Law, Suggest 2012 'Crusader' Policy Iran rejects ‘baseless’ US claims to justify Syria-Iraq border raid https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2021/07/03/661402/Iran-Takht-Ravanchi-US-Iraq-Syria Saturday, 03 July 2021 5:49 AM Iran has dismissed as “completely baseless” accusations leveled at the country by the United States to justify its illegal aerial assault on the Iraqi-Syrian border. At the order of President Joe Biden, US warplanes targeted three locations belonging to Iraq’s anti-terror Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) or Hashd al-Sha’abi in the border town of al-Qa’im in the western Anbar Province early Sunday. The US strike killed four Iraqi fighters who were performing their duties of preventing the infiltration of Daesh terrorists from Syria into Iraq. It also killed a Syrian child and injured three other civilians, according to some sources in the Syrian city of al-Bukamal in Dayr al-Zawr Province. In a letter to the Security Council, US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield claimed that the raid was meant to deter resistance fighters and Tehran from conducting or supporting further attacks on American personnel or facilities in Iraq. "This military response was taken after non-military options proved inadequate to address the threat, with the aim of deescalating the situation and preventing further attacks," read the letter seen by Reuters. US claims staging airstrikes against Iraqi resistance groups along Syria border US claims staging airstrikes against Iraqi resistance groups along Syria border The US claims staging airstrikes against targets allegedly belonging to Iraqi resistance groups along Iraq and Syria’s border. Iran’s UN Ambassador Majid Takht-Ravanchi wrote a letter to the Security Council president, reiterating that the Islamic Republic has not been directly or indirectly involved in any armed attack by any entity or individual against US personnel or facilities in Iraq. "Therefore, any effort to explicitly or implicitly attribute such an accusation to Iran is inaccurate. It even lacks the most obvious reliable information to be proved and is completely baseless. Hence, we categorically reject such claims and consider them legally invalid and devoid of any effect,” he said. “The Islamic Republic strongly rejects the US arbitrary interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter to justify its illegal military attack on Syria and Iraq on June 27, 2021, and vehemently condemns these illegal actions, which violate the sovereignty of the two regional countries.” Under Article 51 of the UN Charter, the 15-member Security Council must immediately be informed of any action that states take in self-defense against an armed attack. The US argument for the offensive “has no real or legal basis because it is based solely on an arbitrary interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter. As a result, the US attacks are a flagrant violation of international law, particularly Article 2 of the UN Charter,” the Iranian envoy said. He further stressed that the recent US bid to accuse others in the region is doomed to failure as it is meant to cover up Washington’s irresponsible and destabilizing activities or divert public opinions from its illegal and adventurous military actions. Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses: www.presstv.ir www.presstv.co.uk www.presstv.tv
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
US 'Airstrikes For God' on Iraq & Syria Break International Law, Signal 2012 Crusader Policy 03 | (Y) | | |
US 'Airstrikes For God' on Iraq & Syria Break International Law, Suggest 2012 'Crusader' Policy Iran rejects ‘baseless’ US claims to justify Syria-Iraq border raid https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2021/07/03/661402/Iran-Takht-Ravanchi-US-Iraq-Syria Saturday, 03 July 2021 5:49 AM Iran has dismissed as “completely baseless” accusations leveled at the country by the United States to justify its illegal aerial assault on the Iraqi-Syrian border. At the order of President Joe Biden, US warplanes targeted three locations belonging to Iraq’s anti-terror Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) or Hashd al-Sha’abi in the border town of al-Qa’im in the western Anbar Province early Sunday. The US strike killed four Iraqi fighters who were performing their duties of preventing the infiltration of Daesh terrorists from Syria into Iraq. It also killed a Syrian child and injured three other civilians, according to some sources in the Syrian city of al-Bukamal in Dayr al-Zawr Province. In a letter to the Security Council, US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield claimed that the raid was meant to deter resistance fighters and Tehran from conducting or supporting further attacks on American personnel or facilities in Iraq. "This military response was taken after non-military options proved inadequate to address the threat, with the aim of deescalating the situation and preventing further attacks," read the letter seen by Reuters. US claims staging airstrikes against Iraqi resistance groups along Syria border US claims staging airstrikes against Iraqi resistance groups along Syria border The US claims staging airstrikes against targets allegedly belonging to Iraqi resistance groups along Iraq and Syria’s border. Iran’s UN Ambassador Majid Takht-Ravanchi wrote a letter to the Security Council president, reiterating that the Islamic Republic has not been directly or indirectly involved in any armed attack by any entity or individual against US personnel or facilities in Iraq. "Therefore, any effort to explicitly or implicitly attribute such an accusation to Iran is inaccurate. It even lacks the most obvious reliable information to be proved and is completely baseless. Hence, we categorically reject such claims and consider them legally invalid and devoid of any effect,” he said. “The Islamic Republic strongly rejects the US arbitrary interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter to justify its illegal military attack on Syria and Iraq on June 27, 2021, and vehemently condemns these illegal actions, which violate the sovereignty of the two regional countries.” Under Article 51 of the UN Charter, the 15-member Security Council must immediately be informed of any action that states take in self-defense against an armed attack. The US argument for the offensive “has no real or legal basis because it is based solely on an arbitrary interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter. As a result, the US attacks are a flagrant violation of international law, particularly Article 2 of the UN Charter,” the Iranian envoy said. He further stressed that the recent US bid to accuse others in the region is doomed to failure as it is meant to cover up Washington’s irresponsible and destabilizing activities or divert public opinions from its illegal and adventurous military actions. Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses: www.presstv.ir www.presstv.co.uk www.presstv.tv
Voir plus
2021-06-22 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 315 votes : 28-1 com : 1 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Far right or Brussels? French have nobody to vote for in regional elections, desperate for 'Frexit' | (Y) | | |
French far right irked by election results, southern region in play PressTV https://www.urmedium.com/c/presstv/80271 France’s far right performed worse than predicted in Sunday’s regional elections, exit polls showed, leaving victory in the southern battleground of Provence-Alpes-Cote d’Azur and a platform for the 2022 presidential election in the balance.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Far right or Brussels? French have nobody to vote for in regional elections, desperate for 'Frexit' | (Y) | | |
French far right irked by election results, southern region in play PressTV https://www.urmedium.com/c/presstv/80271 France’s far right performed worse than predicted in Sunday’s regional elections, exit polls showed, leaving victory in the southern battleground of Provence-Alpes-Cote d’Azur and a platform for the 2022 presidential election in the balance.
Voir plus
2021-06-20 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 402 votes : 30-2 com : 2 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
June 2021 Taishan China EPR Reactor Radiation Leak: Allan Jeffrey & Roy Pumphrey, Stop Hinkley | (Y) | | |
Taishan China EPR Reactor Radiation Leak: Allan Jeffrey and Roy Pumphrey, Stop Hinkley# https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2021/06/17/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-44/ Part One - News Review and Investigative Reports Nuclear energy. Malfunction at Chinese nuclear power facility - How serious is the nuclear power plant radiation leak in China? How long has this been going on for? - EDF first received reports of increases in contamination in the primary circuit in October 2020. The government of Hong Kong, which is 130 kilometres from the plant, said on 8 April there was an “operational event” at the plant on 5 April, which involved the release of a “very small amount of gas”. The gas wasn’t named. Are people at risk? - It appears not. Carrie Lam, the leader of the government of Hong Kong, said today that monitoring of radiation levels around the city shows “everything is normal”. EDF maintains the level of radioactivity observed at the plant is below levels required by Chinese authorities. Framatome described the problems at the plant as “a performance issue”. “According to the data available, the plant is operating within the safety parameters,” it said in a statement. Alan Jeffrey and Roy Pomphrey, from Stop Hinkley, on the problems with nuclear energy and how it isn’t ‘green’ or the answer to climate change. Hinkley Point C: a fish killing machine? - 03 June 2021 - Lifelong angler and champion of angling in the Bristol Channel, John May has been leading the campaign against the proposed cooling water intakes for Hinkley Point C power station. As with the proposed power station at Sizewell, Suffolk, the operators, EDF, propose to use cooling water taken directly from the sea, a process that risks killing millions of fish a year. I have spoken about the killing of fish and marine life and met with experienced people connected to nuclear power stations, local NGOs, the Angling Trust and members of my own fishing club that have worked at HPC. All have added to my comments and observations. All fear the consequences of the HPC scheme even before the request for the removal of the AFDs was made. EDF have published thousands of pages of information to support their so called “fish friendly” measures. All is disputed and my fear is that the impact is being seriously downplayed. I am not against Hinckley Point C itself. This is not about stopping the building of a nuclear power station. It is about the impact on the fish and marine life of the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary, which we must not forget, is meant to have some of the highest levels of environmental protection there is. The EA, CEFAS and EDF need to be straight with the public and fulfil their responsibility to protect the marine environment. Some kill is inevitable but not to this extent. I am so annoyed at the way that the mighty EDF advised by CEFAS have given out so much misinformation to the public and the way that they seem to be manipulating the process. They both know the process inside out. For many anglers and the public it is highly technical and confusing. The effects of HPC will be felt throughout the channel on both the Welsh and English waters for at least the next 70 years. We must get it right or it will slowly and continuously take a massive toll on the environment just like HPB has been doing. Mayor Marvin in documentary about the removal of Colston statue in Bristol. Bristol mayor blocks critics on social media, so receives 'overwhelmingly positive' feedback after Statue Wars documentary - “Opening the office up to the transparency of a fly on the wall was clearly very powerful” - One scene showed a member of the mayor’s office going through letters sent by members of the public after the bronze figure of the slave trader Edward Colston was pulled down and dumped in the harbour in June 2020. Testimony of a traveller who witnessed police attacking attendees at the peaceful 23 March 2021 Kill the Bill protest on College Green in Bristol. If you were hurt by or witnessed police action on College Green March 23 there's a listening event I'm facilitating Sunday 13th June 5pm on College Green where you can speak your testimony to the Cathedral Dean in person. This is not an enquiry, but a listening, and I think could impact on how the cathedral perceive and manage the land they own. - Bristol protests:
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
June 2021 Taishan China EPR Reactor Radiation Leak: Allan Jeffrey & Roy Pumphrey, Stop Hinkley | (Y) | | |
Taishan China EPR Reactor Radiation Leak: Allan Jeffrey and Roy Pumphrey, Stop Hinkley# https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2021/06/17/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-44/ Part One - News Review and Investigative Reports Nuclear energy. Malfunction at Chinese nuclear power facility - How serious is the nuclear power plant radiation leak in China? How long has this been going on for? - EDF first received reports of increases in contamination in the primary circuit in October 2020. The government of Hong Kong, which is 130 kilometres from the plant, said on 8 April there was an “operational event” at the plant on 5 April, which involved the release of a “very small amount of gas”. The gas wasn’t named. Are people at risk? - It appears not. Carrie Lam, the leader of the government of Hong Kong, said today that monitoring of radiation levels around the city shows “everything is normal”. EDF maintains the level of radioactivity observed at the plant is below levels required by Chinese authorities. Framatome described the problems at the plant as “a performance issue”. “According to the data available, the plant is operating within the safety parameters,” it said in a statement. Alan Jeffrey and Roy Pomphrey, from Stop Hinkley, on the problems with nuclear energy and how it isn’t ‘green’ or the answer to climate change. Hinkley Point C: a fish killing machine? - 03 June 2021 - Lifelong angler and champion of angling in the Bristol Channel, John May has been leading the campaign against the proposed cooling water intakes for Hinkley Point C power station. As with the proposed power station at Sizewell, Suffolk, the operators, EDF, propose to use cooling water taken directly from the sea, a process that risks killing millions of fish a year. I have spoken about the killing of fish and marine life and met with experienced people connected to nuclear power stations, local NGOs, the Angling Trust and members of my own fishing club that have worked at HPC. All have added to my comments and observations. All fear the consequences of the HPC scheme even before the request for the removal of the AFDs was made. EDF have published thousands of pages of information to support their so called “fish friendly” measures. All is disputed and my fear is that the impact is being seriously downplayed. I am not against Hinckley Point C itself. This is not about stopping the building of a nuclear power station. It is about the impact on the fish and marine life of the Bristol Channel and Severn Estuary, which we must not forget, is meant to have some of the highest levels of environmental protection there is. The EA, CEFAS and EDF need to be straight with the public and fulfil their responsibility to protect the marine environment. Some kill is inevitable but not to this extent. I am so annoyed at the way that the mighty EDF advised by CEFAS have given out so much misinformation to the public and the way that they seem to be manipulating the process. They both know the process inside out. For many anglers and the public it is highly technical and confusing. The effects of HPC will be felt throughout the channel on both the Welsh and English waters for at least the next 70 years. We must get it right or it will slowly and continuously take a massive toll on the environment just like HPB has been doing. Mayor Marvin in documentary about the removal of Colston statue in Bristol. Bristol mayor blocks critics on social media, so receives 'overwhelmingly positive' feedback after Statue Wars documentary - “Opening the office up to the transparency of a fly on the wall was clearly very powerful” - One scene showed a member of the mayor’s office going through letters sent by members of the public after the bronze figure of the slave trader Edward Colston was pulled down and dumped in the harbour in June 2020. Testimony of a traveller who witnessed police attacking attendees at the peaceful 23 March 2021 Kill the Bill protest on College Green in Bristol. If you were hurt by or witnessed police action on College Green March 23 there's a listening event I'm facilitating Sunday 13th June 5pm on College Green where you can speak your testimony to the Cathedral Dean in person. This is not an enquiry, but a listening, and I think could impact on how the cathedral perceive and manage the land they own. - Bristol protests:
Voir plus
2021-06-17 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 792 votes : 16-1 com : 12 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
ITV News Clarion Housing Association Echoes Victorian Landlords Halts Repairs On Decaying Propertie | (Y) | | |
Collapsed ceilings, mice and mould: Appalling conditions uncovered across an entire housing estate of nearly 500 homes HOUSING https://www.itv.com/news/2021-06-16/collapsed-ceilings-mice-and-mould-appalling-conditions-uncovered-across-an-entire-housing-estate-of-nearly-500-homes Wednesday 16 June 2021, 11:13pm Daniel Hewitt Political Correspondent ITV News Political Correspondent Daniel Hewitt reports on the dire conditions families have to live in from Clarion Housing The UK’s biggest housing association has admitted it has failed tenants after an ITV News investigation found widespread disrepair and squalid conditions across an entire housing estate of nearly 500 homes. Clarion Housing issued an apology to all its residents of Eastfields Estate in Mitcham, south London, admitting that they “had not had the service they deserve.” ITV News found shocking conditions on the estate and dozens of families living in damp, mouldy, crumbling homes with ongoing leaks. The estate is plagued by a rodent infestation, with several residents showing us videos of mice and rats in their properties. Watch the appalling conditions uncovered across the entire Eastfields housing estate Clarion, which owns 125,000 homes across the UK and this year recorded a turnover of £943 million, have been accused by Eastfields' tenants of abandoning them and ignoring their complaints for years. Housing Associations offer more affordable rented housing, predominantly to people on lower incomes. Housing crisis: Resilience of people living in bad conditions is remarkable, but cultural change is needed Man with breathing difficulties left to live in squalid housing as Hancock condemns 'horrific conditions' exposed by ITV Similar to council housing, housing associations charge generally cheaper rent than privately rented housing with longer tenancies. Affordable housing for rent however is in short supply, and there are long waiting lists for housing association homes - it is common for people to wait several years to be given a permanent property. An example of what we saw on the housing estate. Juliet Arthur and her husband work three jobs between them to pay Clarion £1,300 a month for a property they live in with their three children. They have been forced to live for eight months without any lights on the top floor of their house, including in the family bathroom and their children’s bedroom. The lights cut out in November last year after a leak in her living room caused the ceiling to collapse, inches from where her son was doing schoolwork. When we visited Juliet on June 1, there was still a huge hole in her ceiling, seven months after it caved in. ‘Imagine having your child sitting there… and the roof just drops’: Juliet Arthur says she worries for the safety of her family
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
ITV News Clarion Housing Association Echoes Victorian Landlords Halts Repairs On Decaying Propertie | (Y) | | |
Collapsed ceilings, mice and mould: Appalling conditions uncovered across an entire housing estate of nearly 500 homes HOUSING https://www.itv.com/news/2021-06-16/collapsed-ceilings-mice-and-mould-appalling-conditions-uncovered-across-an-entire-housing-estate-of-nearly-500-homes Wednesday 16 June 2021, 11:13pm Daniel Hewitt Political Correspondent ITV News Political Correspondent Daniel Hewitt reports on the dire conditions families have to live in from Clarion Housing The UK’s biggest housing association has admitted it has failed tenants after an ITV News investigation found widespread disrepair and squalid conditions across an entire housing estate of nearly 500 homes. Clarion Housing issued an apology to all its residents of Eastfields Estate in Mitcham, south London, admitting that they “had not had the service they deserve.” ITV News found shocking conditions on the estate and dozens of families living in damp, mouldy, crumbling homes with ongoing leaks. The estate is plagued by a rodent infestation, with several residents showing us videos of mice and rats in their properties. Watch the appalling conditions uncovered across the entire Eastfields housing estate Clarion, which owns 125,000 homes across the UK and this year recorded a turnover of £943 million, have been accused by Eastfields' tenants of abandoning them and ignoring their complaints for years. Housing Associations offer more affordable rented housing, predominantly to people on lower incomes. Housing crisis: Resilience of people living in bad conditions is remarkable, but cultural change is needed Man with breathing difficulties left to live in squalid housing as Hancock condemns 'horrific conditions' exposed by ITV Similar to council housing, housing associations charge generally cheaper rent than privately rented housing with longer tenancies. Affordable housing for rent however is in short supply, and there are long waiting lists for housing association homes - it is common for people to wait several years to be given a permanent property. An example of what we saw on the housing estate. Juliet Arthur and her husband work three jobs between them to pay Clarion £1,300 a month for a property they live in with their three children. They have been forced to live for eight months without any lights on the top floor of their house, including in the family bathroom and their children’s bedroom. The lights cut out in November last year after a leak in her living room caused the ceiling to collapse, inches from where her son was doing schoolwork. When we visited Juliet on June 1, there was still a huge hole in her ceiling, seven months after it caved in. ‘Imagine having your child sitting there… and the roof just drops’: Juliet Arthur says she worries for the safety of her family
Voir plus
2021-06-15 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 268 votes : 23-0 com : 6 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Biden meeting Putin says NATO does not seek conflict with Russia despite 'cyberattacks' | (Y) | | |
Biden meeting Putin says NATO does not seek conflict with Russia despite 'cyberattacks' Biden’s Message to NATO Summit: U.S. Has Sacred Obligation to Article 5 War Clause By Rick Rozoff Global Research, June 14, 2021 https://www.globalresearch.ca/biden-message-nato-summit-us-sacred-obligation-article-5-war-clause/5747670 Voice of America today ran a story about the tenor and theme of President Joe Biden’s presentation at tomorrow’s NATO summit in Brussels with the headline Biden to Reassure Allies of US Commitment to NATO Mutual Defense Clause. In the report it cites a pledge Biden made in an address to American Air Force service members at the Royal Air Force Mildenhall base on June 9: “In Brussels, I will make it clear that the United States’ commitment to our NATO Alliance and Article 5 is rock solid. It’s a sacred obligation that we have under Article 5.” Today the White House posted an online fact sheet on the summit which contained in its opening paragraph this stark statement: “During the Summit, the President will reaffirm the enduring Transatlantic bond through NATO and underscore the United States’ ironclad commitment to Article 5 – an attack on one is an attack on all and will be met with a collective response.” In the Mildenhall speech Biden also celebrated the fact that the U.S. and his host country, the United Kingdom, were founding members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. He failed to add they’re both nuclear powers and have fought together in NATO’s wars in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Libya. NATO was characterized by the American commander-in-chief as “the strongest military and political alliance in the history of the world,” adding, “that’s not hyperbole.” Both points rare instances of veracity from him. NATO in fact is unique in a manner that cannot be exaggerated. It is unique in the following ways: it is the only military alliance in the world it is the longest-lasting military bloc in the modern history of the world, this year marking its 72nd anniversary it is the largest military bloc ever, with 30 members and 40 partners on all six inhabited continents (up from 16 members and no partners 30 years ago) it maintains military relations with as many more nations, including the 55-nation African Union and Troop Contributing Countries from the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America that served under its command in Afghanistan it has waged war in three continents (Yugoslavia in Europe, Afghanistan in Asia and Libya in Africa) it is the only military alliance to have ever included more than one nuclear power (the U.S., Britain and France) and to openly proclaim itself a nuclear alliance it is the only military alliance that has defined outer space as an operational domain as well as air, land, sea and cyberspace, and that has just opened a Space Centre (in Germany) There are several other aspects of NATO and its activities that are unprecedented in scope and nature. Not the least important of which is its Article 5 mutual military assistance provision, the essence of which is: “The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them…will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.” There is no greater threat to peace, to world peace in the nuclear age, than for a military alliance of 30 nations (and growing) to be prepared to go to war (including against nuclear powers) at the request of any of its member states. It is that collective defense obligation that Biden has focused on since taking office in January and that he will highlight at tomorrow’s thirty-nation summit. It is in fact a central theme, arguably the main one, of his foreign policy. In his virtual address to the annual Munich Security Conference in February he said: “We continue to support the goal of a Europe whole and free and at peace. The United States is fully committed to our NATO Alliance, and I welcome Europe’s growing investment in the military capabilities that enable our shared defense. “You know, to me and to the United States, and to us, we’ll keep article – we’ll keep faith with Article 5. It’s a guarantee. An attack on one is an attack on all. That is our unshakable vow….” In an opinion piece in the Washington Post on June 5, Biden wrote (or had attributed to him): “As new technologies reshape our world in fundamental ways, exposing vulnerabilities like ransomware attacks and creating threats such as invasive AI-driven surveillance, the democracies of the world must together ensure that our values govern the use and development of these innovations – not the interests of autocrats.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Biden meeting Putin says NATO does not seek conflict with Russia despite 'cyberattacks' | (Y) | | |
Biden meeting Putin says NATO does not seek conflict with Russia despite 'cyberattacks' Biden’s Message to NATO Summit: U.S. Has Sacred Obligation to Article 5 War Clause By Rick Rozoff Global Research, June 14, 2021 https://www.globalresearch.ca/biden-message-nato-summit-us-sacred-obligation-article-5-war-clause/5747670 Voice of America today ran a story about the tenor and theme of President Joe Biden’s presentation at tomorrow’s NATO summit in Brussels with the headline Biden to Reassure Allies of US Commitment to NATO Mutual Defense Clause. In the report it cites a pledge Biden made in an address to American Air Force service members at the Royal Air Force Mildenhall base on June 9: “In Brussels, I will make it clear that the United States’ commitment to our NATO Alliance and Article 5 is rock solid. It’s a sacred obligation that we have under Article 5.” Today the White House posted an online fact sheet on the summit which contained in its opening paragraph this stark statement: “During the Summit, the President will reaffirm the enduring Transatlantic bond through NATO and underscore the United States’ ironclad commitment to Article 5 – an attack on one is an attack on all and will be met with a collective response.” In the Mildenhall speech Biden also celebrated the fact that the U.S. and his host country, the United Kingdom, were founding members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. He failed to add they’re both nuclear powers and have fought together in NATO’s wars in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Libya. NATO was characterized by the American commander-in-chief as “the strongest military and political alliance in the history of the world,” adding, “that’s not hyperbole.” Both points rare instances of veracity from him. NATO in fact is unique in a manner that cannot be exaggerated. It is unique in the following ways: it is the only military alliance in the world it is the longest-lasting military bloc in the modern history of the world, this year marking its 72nd anniversary it is the largest military bloc ever, with 30 members and 40 partners on all six inhabited continents (up from 16 members and no partners 30 years ago) it maintains military relations with as many more nations, including the 55-nation African Union and Troop Contributing Countries from the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America that served under its command in Afghanistan it has waged war in three continents (Yugoslavia in Europe, Afghanistan in Asia and Libya in Africa) it is the only military alliance to have ever included more than one nuclear power (the U.S., Britain and France) and to openly proclaim itself a nuclear alliance it is the only military alliance that has defined outer space as an operational domain as well as air, land, sea and cyberspace, and that has just opened a Space Centre (in Germany) There are several other aspects of NATO and its activities that are unprecedented in scope and nature. Not the least important of which is its Article 5 mutual military assistance provision, the essence of which is: “The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them…will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.” There is no greater threat to peace, to world peace in the nuclear age, than for a military alliance of 30 nations (and growing) to be prepared to go to war (including against nuclear powers) at the request of any of its member states. It is that collective defense obligation that Biden has focused on since taking office in January and that he will highlight at tomorrow’s thirty-nation summit. It is in fact a central theme, arguably the main one, of his foreign policy. In his virtual address to the annual Munich Security Conference in February he said: “We continue to support the goal of a Europe whole and free and at peace. The United States is fully committed to our NATO Alliance, and I welcome Europe’s growing investment in the military capabilities that enable our shared defense. “You know, to me and to the United States, and to us, we’ll keep article – we’ll keep faith with Article 5. It’s a guarantee. An attack on one is an attack on all. That is our unshakable vow….” In an opinion piece in the Washington Post on June 5, Biden wrote (or had attributed to him): “As new technologies reshape our world in fundamental ways, exposing vulnerabilities like ransomware attacks and creating threats such as invasive AI-driven surveillance, the democracies of the world must together ensure that our values govern the use and development of these innovations – not the interests of autocrats.
Voir plus
2021-06-10 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 204 votes : 14-0 com : 2 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Roy Pumphrey Stop Hinkley Cost overruns 28 May 2021 | (Y) | | |
Roy Pumphrey - Stop Hinkley Cost overruns 28 may 2021 http://stophinkley.org/ Wriggling out of it 15th April 2021 The Leveller https://leveller.live When Hinkley C got the go ahead, all sorts of conditions were imposed to provide environmental protection. Among these was what amounts to an underwater loudspeaker. This ‘Acoustic Fish Deterrent’ (AFD) was to be placed in front of the pipes taking water from the sea to cool the power station. The idea was to stop fish swimming into the pipes and meeting an untimely end in the process. Like all good developers, NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited the company actually developing and building the nuclear power station for EdF, were perfectly happy at the time (2013). To the layman, it often appears that the general tactic with these largescale projects is ” agree to everything – then contest it afterwards”. Not unlike developers who agree that a percentage of a development can be set aside for affordable housing and then come back saying “terribly sorry, we can’t afford it”. ln 2019 Hinkley ran a consultation on the issue. They claim that while impact of the AFDs on the volume of fish taken in through the pipes would be negligible, the AFDs posed a risk to divers who would have to maintain the system in waters which are notoriously treacherous. There is poor visibility in the water in this area and one of the highest tidal ranges in the world. ln a statement to The Leveller an EdF spokesperson told us “Hinkley Point C is the first power station in the Severn Estuary to include fish protection measures in its design and the acoustic fish deterrent is just one of three planned measures to protect marine life. Studies from Government marine experts showed that removing it would have a negligible impact on local fish populations.” Slippery behaviour ln short, HPC asked the Environment Agency to vary the permit they had to go with the planning permission, so that they did not have to install the AFD. The EA determines these applications in the first instance. With a pandemic raging, this was never going to be quick. However having shared their initial findings with HPC, The EA were told that HPC considered it likely they would be refused. And in the absence of a final decision, but assuming it would not go in their favour, they appealed the case to The Secretary of State on 24 September. Following that appeal, the Planning lnspectorate in Bristol was told to initiate a public inquiry into the issues around the request from HPC. This is a device that effectively bypasses the EA. They are now reduced to submitting evidence to the lnquiry, but the decision will now be made by a Planning lnspector instead of the EA. The EdF spokesperson told us “The project remains committed to reducing the environmental impact from the construction of a power station which will play a key role in fighting climate change and boosting the Somerset economy.” The lnquiry will take place during the weeks starting 7 and 14 June 2021. The Planning lnspectorate has decided that the hearing will be held publicly, which means anyone is welcome to attend. It will be held online, but details of the platform to be used, the timings of sessions, or how to dial in are not available yet.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Roy Pumphrey Stop Hinkley Cost overruns 28 May 2021 | (Y) | | |
Roy Pumphrey - Stop Hinkley Cost overruns 28 may 2021 http://stophinkley.org/ Wriggling out of it 15th April 2021 The Leveller https://leveller.live When Hinkley C got the go ahead, all sorts of conditions were imposed to provide environmental protection. Among these was what amounts to an underwater loudspeaker. This ‘Acoustic Fish Deterrent’ (AFD) was to be placed in front of the pipes taking water from the sea to cool the power station. The idea was to stop fish swimming into the pipes and meeting an untimely end in the process. Like all good developers, NNB Generation Company (HPC) Limited the company actually developing and building the nuclear power station for EdF, were perfectly happy at the time (2013). To the layman, it often appears that the general tactic with these largescale projects is ” agree to everything – then contest it afterwards”. Not unlike developers who agree that a percentage of a development can be set aside for affordable housing and then come back saying “terribly sorry, we can’t afford it”. ln 2019 Hinkley ran a consultation on the issue. They claim that while impact of the AFDs on the volume of fish taken in through the pipes would be negligible, the AFDs posed a risk to divers who would have to maintain the system in waters which are notoriously treacherous. There is poor visibility in the water in this area and one of the highest tidal ranges in the world. ln a statement to The Leveller an EdF spokesperson told us “Hinkley Point C is the first power station in the Severn Estuary to include fish protection measures in its design and the acoustic fish deterrent is just one of three planned measures to protect marine life. Studies from Government marine experts showed that removing it would have a negligible impact on local fish populations.” Slippery behaviour ln short, HPC asked the Environment Agency to vary the permit they had to go with the planning permission, so that they did not have to install the AFD. The EA determines these applications in the first instance. With a pandemic raging, this was never going to be quick. However having shared their initial findings with HPC, The EA were told that HPC considered it likely they would be refused. And in the absence of a final decision, but assuming it would not go in their favour, they appealed the case to The Secretary of State on 24 September. Following that appeal, the Planning lnspectorate in Bristol was told to initiate a public inquiry into the issues around the request from HPC. This is a device that effectively bypasses the EA. They are now reduced to submitting evidence to the lnquiry, but the decision will now be made by a Planning lnspector instead of the EA. The EdF spokesperson told us “The project remains committed to reducing the environmental impact from the construction of a power station which will play a key role in fighting climate change and boosting the Somerset economy.” The lnquiry will take place during the weeks starting 7 and 14 June 2021. The Planning lnspectorate has decided that the hearing will be held publicly, which means anyone is welcome to attend. It will be held online, but details of the platform to be used, the timings of sessions, or how to dial in are not available yet.
Voir plus
2021-06-09 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 414 votes : 33-2 com : 5 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Hezbollah chief Nasrallah leading world in resisting warmongers, Tony Gosling Scott Bennett Press T | (Y) | | |
Hezbollah chief Nasrallah slams Saudi Arabia's blockade on Yemen Tony Gosling Scott Bennett Press TV Hezbollah chief Nasrallah leading world in resisting warmongers, Tony Gosling Scott Bennett Press TV Hezbollah chief, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, says Saudi Arabia has tightened the siege of Yemen to make up for its failures in the years-long war on its neighbor. https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/06/08/658582/Lebanon-Hezbollah-Nasrallah-pray-al-Aqsa-Mosque-Israel-Iran Hezbollah’s secretary-general says Muslims will eventually prevail over the Israeli regime and its allies’ efforts to interfere with their observing their religious rituals at al-Aqsa Mosque in the holy occupied city of al-Quds. “I am still hopeful that we will [eventually] pray together at the sacred al-Aqsa Mosque,” Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said in a televised address on Tuesday. He pointed to the anniversary of Naksa (Setback), which marks the Israeli regime’s occupation of a whole host of regional territories -- including the Palestinian territory of the West Bank, where al-Quds is located, Lebanon’s Shebaa Farms, and Syria’s Golan Heights -- in a Western-backed war in 1967. The Hezbollah chief noted how the Palestinians across the occupied territories had been struggling “with patience and sacrifice” to preserve the status quo in al-Quds and the al-Aqsa Mosque’s compound throughout decades that have passed since the war. Hezbollah official warns Israel of 'fire of hell' after Gantz's threat Hezbollah official warns Israel of 'fire of hell' after Gantz's threat Hassan Baghdadi’s comments came days after Israel Now, the international Muslim Ummah (Nation) has to pursue this matter shoulder to shoulder with them, Nasrallah said. Imam Khomeini’s legacy He also commemorated the memory of Imam Khomeini, the late founder of the Islamic Republic in Iran. Nasrallah hailed how the late revolutionary leader breathed life into the global Muslim Nation and revitalized the spirit of resistance and fighting against oppression. Gratitude towards Ansarullah The Hezbollah leader, meanwhile, voiced gratitude towards Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, leader of Yemen’s popular Houthi Ansarullah movement, for the latter’s expression of support for resistance efforts aimed at preserving al-Quds and the Islamic sanctities there. Nasrallah also congratulated the Yemeni people for their successful resistance and struggle against a United States-backed Saudi Arabia-led coalition that has been attacking the impoverished country since 2015. “Now, we are witnessing the defeat of the aggressive Saudi-American coalition,” he said, adding, “Ever since the first day [of the war], we had faith in the Yemeni people’s strength for steadfastness and victory.” ‘Al-Manar broadcasts resistance’s voice, image’ Nasrallah, who was speaking on the 30th anniversary of al-Manar’s foundation, commended the Lebanese television network as a broadcaster “founded on the basis of piety to serve as [the outlet airing] the resistance’s voice and image.” The network had never pursued competitive agendas, he said, adding that it bore its own message and had made sacrifices on the path of trying to send it across. Lebanon’s economy Meanwhile, the Hezbollah official slammed those businessmen hoarding foodstuffs and medicines amid Lebanon’s dire economic conditions. He urged the authorities to confront them in order to be able to resolve part of the country’s economic woes. The fuel crisis in the country, which had had the Lebanese queue up at gas stations could be resolved “within days” through the purchase of fuel products from Iran, Nasrallah noted. Such transaction, however, required “a courageous political decision,” he noted, apparently referring to the prospect of Washington’s frowning on Beirut.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Hezbollah chief Nasrallah leading world in resisting warmongers, Tony Gosling Scott Bennett Press T | (Y) | | |
Hezbollah chief Nasrallah slams Saudi Arabia's blockade on Yemen Tony Gosling Scott Bennett Press TV Hezbollah chief Nasrallah leading world in resisting warmongers, Tony Gosling Scott Bennett Press TV Hezbollah chief, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, says Saudi Arabia has tightened the siege of Yemen to make up for its failures in the years-long war on its neighbor. https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/06/08/658582/Lebanon-Hezbollah-Nasrallah-pray-al-Aqsa-Mosque-Israel-Iran Hezbollah’s secretary-general says Muslims will eventually prevail over the Israeli regime and its allies’ efforts to interfere with their observing their religious rituals at al-Aqsa Mosque in the holy occupied city of al-Quds. “I am still hopeful that we will [eventually] pray together at the sacred al-Aqsa Mosque,” Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah said in a televised address on Tuesday. He pointed to the anniversary of Naksa (Setback), which marks the Israeli regime’s occupation of a whole host of regional territories -- including the Palestinian territory of the West Bank, where al-Quds is located, Lebanon’s Shebaa Farms, and Syria’s Golan Heights -- in a Western-backed war in 1967. The Hezbollah chief noted how the Palestinians across the occupied territories had been struggling “with patience and sacrifice” to preserve the status quo in al-Quds and the al-Aqsa Mosque’s compound throughout decades that have passed since the war. Hezbollah official warns Israel of 'fire of hell' after Gantz's threat Hezbollah official warns Israel of 'fire of hell' after Gantz's threat Hassan Baghdadi’s comments came days after Israel Now, the international Muslim Ummah (Nation) has to pursue this matter shoulder to shoulder with them, Nasrallah said. Imam Khomeini’s legacy He also commemorated the memory of Imam Khomeini, the late founder of the Islamic Republic in Iran. Nasrallah hailed how the late revolutionary leader breathed life into the global Muslim Nation and revitalized the spirit of resistance and fighting against oppression. Gratitude towards Ansarullah The Hezbollah leader, meanwhile, voiced gratitude towards Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, leader of Yemen’s popular Houthi Ansarullah movement, for the latter’s expression of support for resistance efforts aimed at preserving al-Quds and the Islamic sanctities there. Nasrallah also congratulated the Yemeni people for their successful resistance and struggle against a United States-backed Saudi Arabia-led coalition that has been attacking the impoverished country since 2015. “Now, we are witnessing the defeat of the aggressive Saudi-American coalition,” he said, adding, “Ever since the first day [of the war], we had faith in the Yemeni people’s strength for steadfastness and victory.” ‘Al-Manar broadcasts resistance’s voice, image’ Nasrallah, who was speaking on the 30th anniversary of al-Manar’s foundation, commended the Lebanese television network as a broadcaster “founded on the basis of piety to serve as [the outlet airing] the resistance’s voice and image.” The network had never pursued competitive agendas, he said, adding that it bore its own message and had made sacrifices on the path of trying to send it across. Lebanon’s economy Meanwhile, the Hezbollah official slammed those businessmen hoarding foodstuffs and medicines amid Lebanon’s dire economic conditions. He urged the authorities to confront them in order to be able to resolve part of the country’s economic woes. The fuel crisis in the country, which had had the Lebanese queue up at gas stations could be resolved “within days” through the purchase of fuel products from Iran, Nasrallah noted. Such transaction, however, required “a courageous political decision,” he noted, apparently referring to the prospect of Washington’s frowning on Beirut.
Voir plus
2021-06-08 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 234 votes : 18-1 com : 4 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Emergency Patients Wait 8-10h To See A Doctor SACK CEO DEBORAH LEE! Gloucester Royal Hospital Ramme | (Y) | | |
Emergency Patients Wait 8-10h To See A Doctor SACK CEO DEBORAH LEE! Gloucester Royal Hospital Rammed
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Emergency Patients Wait 8-10h To See A Doctor SACK CEO DEBORAH LEE! Gloucester Royal Hospital Ramme | (Y) | | |
Emergency Patients Wait 8-10h To See A Doctor SACK CEO DEBORAH LEE! Gloucester Royal Hospital Rammed
Voir plus
2021-06-06 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 490 votes : 66-2 com : 9 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Julian Assange 'Our Number One Enemy Is Ignorance' On Wests Mass Media Propaganda | (Y) | | |
Julian Assange 'Our Number One Enemy Is Ignorance' On Wests Mass Media Propaganda From my old Russian Orthodox network https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yhFRWaQbNg
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Julian Assange 'Our Number One Enemy Is Ignorance' On Wests Mass Media Propaganda | (Y) | | |
Julian Assange 'Our Number One Enemy Is Ignorance' On Wests Mass Media Propaganda From my old Russian Orthodox network https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yhFRWaQbNg
Voir plus
2021-05-26 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 667 votes : 56-3 com : 2 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Cummings, Bashir, Diana Assassination, Belarus, Putin. Richie Allen, Tony Gosling, Wed 26 May 2021 | (Y) | | |
Cummings Bashir Diana Assassination Belarus Putin Richie Allen Tony Gosling Wed 26 May 2021
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Cummings, Bashir, Diana Assassination, Belarus, Putin. Richie Allen, Tony Gosling, Wed 26 May 2021 | (Y) | | |
Cummings Bashir Diana Assassination Belarus Putin Richie Allen Tony Gosling Wed 26 May 2021
Voir plus
2021-05-25 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 250 votes : 5-12 com : 12 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Pro Israel Demonstration in London ITV News May 2021 | (Y) | | |
Pro Israel Demonstration in London ITV News May 2021
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Pro Israel Demonstration in London ITV News May 2021 | (Y) | | |
Pro Israel Demonstration in London ITV News May 2021
Voir plus
2021-05-25 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 638 votes : 23-7 com : 18 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
UK BLM leader Sasha Johnson shot in the head in gangland squabble - BLM too close to organised crim | (Y) | | |
UK BLM leader Sasha Johnson shot in the head in gangland squabble - BLM too close to organised crime
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
UK BLM leader Sasha Johnson shot in the head in gangland squabble - BLM too close to organised crim | (Y) | | |
UK BLM leader Sasha Johnson shot in the head in gangland squabble - BLM too close to organised crime
Voir plus
2021-05-18 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 351 votes : 44-0 com : 5 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Raven Pub Bath Landlord Rod Humphris Bristol Freedom Rally College Green 15 May 2021 | (Y) | | |
Raven Pub Bath Landlord Rod Humphris Bristol Freedom Rally College Green 15 May 2021 Thanks to Tyrant Finder channel for audio and video https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8Ygd5QI2csjHVmFmkZ5TOg Keir Starmer asked to leave Bath pub by furious landlord 19 April 2021 Sir Keir Starmer was confronted by an angry landlord who demanded the Labour leader "get out of his pub". Rod Humphris, of The Raven on Queen Street, told Mr Starmer he had "failed him" as a long-time Labour voter after failing to hold the government to account over its handling of the Covid pandemic, James Millar: Keir Starmer could have engaged with angry pub landlord Rod Humphris to prove his worth as a politician By James Millar https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/opinion/columnists/james-millar/3070750/keir-starmer-rod-humphris-pub-landlord-opinion-james-millar/ April 20, 2021, 2:30 pm © Ben Birchall/PA WireSir Keir Starmer is confronted by Rod Humphris (right), landlord of The Raven pub in Bath Sir Keir Starmer is confronted by Rod Humphris (right), landlord of The Raven pub in Bath Sign up for our daily newsletter featuring the top stories from The Press and Journal. Enter your email address Sign Up The pub landlord that gave Keir Starmer both barrels on Monday accused the Labour leader to his face of failing. Starmer failed all right. He failed to respond to Rod Humphris’ verbal assault properly. James Millar Humphris, co-owner of The Raven pub in Bath, first assailed Starmer in the street during a walkabout in the west country city. He claimed Labour had failed to ask the right questions on coronavirus. He waved some graphs around and insisted the economy had been sacrificed “because old people are dying”. Starmer chose not to engage. This is an improvement on previous Labour leadership figures meeting the public. Tony Blair was famously ambushed by Sharon Storer for his failings on the NHS, John Prescott punched a man and Gordon Brown called an old lady a bigot. Better to stay schtum than get in the that sort of hot water. Instead, Labour responded on Twitter with a link to a voter registration page and an insistence that any further response would be to spread the disinformation Humphris was spouting. Cue division on social media. Supporters insisted Starmer was best to broadly ignore an angry, rude man. And that the Labour leader’s security were right to bundle Humphris away. Bear in mind a sitting MP, Jo Cox, was murdered in the course of campaigning just five years ago. Opponents of Starmer were enraged. One particularly on point tweet came from Martin Daubney, Brexit party MEP turned man-that-shouts-at-lockdowns-on-the-internet. He accused Starmer of demanding “sooner, harder, longer lockdowns”. Which is true. But anyone who values human life over beer now concedes that every lockdown so far should’ve started sooner and laster longer. How to have a productive disagreement The reaction online summed up exactly why Starmer failed in his response. It sounds counter intuitive, but in fact the best way to bridge divides is to argue. Humphris was talking nonsense. Starmer should have taken him on. But he should not have set out to diminish, destroy or mock the pub owner. He should have sought to disagree productively. A recent book called Conflicted by ad man turned centrist guru Ian Leslie could have helped. At its core is a plea for more conflict, conducted with empathy and civility, to harness disagreement to useful ends. There is value in hearing a range of voices. And, crucial for Starmer’s chances in any and all of the upcoming elections (apart from the London mayoral election which Labour doesn’t need to worry about because the Tory candidate is a clown and Sadiq Khan has bagged the all important endorsement of New Rules singer Dua Lipa) is the fact that folk respect reasoned debate and politicians who stand up for themselves. Starmer had an opportunity to show that he stands up for something, engages with other points of view, and disagrees respectfully and productively
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Raven Pub Bath Landlord Rod Humphris Bristol Freedom Rally College Green 15 May 2021 | (Y) | | |
Raven Pub Bath Landlord Rod Humphris Bristol Freedom Rally College Green 15 May 2021 Thanks to Tyrant Finder channel for audio and video https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8Ygd5QI2csjHVmFmkZ5TOg Keir Starmer asked to leave Bath pub by furious landlord 19 April 2021 Sir Keir Starmer was confronted by an angry landlord who demanded the Labour leader "get out of his pub". Rod Humphris, of The Raven on Queen Street, told Mr Starmer he had "failed him" as a long-time Labour voter after failing to hold the government to account over its handling of the Covid pandemic, James Millar: Keir Starmer could have engaged with angry pub landlord Rod Humphris to prove his worth as a politician By James Millar https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/opinion/columnists/james-millar/3070750/keir-starmer-rod-humphris-pub-landlord-opinion-james-millar/ April 20, 2021, 2:30 pm © Ben Birchall/PA WireSir Keir Starmer is confronted by Rod Humphris (right), landlord of The Raven pub in Bath Sir Keir Starmer is confronted by Rod Humphris (right), landlord of The Raven pub in Bath Sign up for our daily newsletter featuring the top stories from The Press and Journal. Enter your email address Sign Up The pub landlord that gave Keir Starmer both barrels on Monday accused the Labour leader to his face of failing. Starmer failed all right. He failed to respond to Rod Humphris’ verbal assault properly. James Millar Humphris, co-owner of The Raven pub in Bath, first assailed Starmer in the street during a walkabout in the west country city. He claimed Labour had failed to ask the right questions on coronavirus. He waved some graphs around and insisted the economy had been sacrificed “because old people are dying”. Starmer chose not to engage. This is an improvement on previous Labour leadership figures meeting the public. Tony Blair was famously ambushed by Sharon Storer for his failings on the NHS, John Prescott punched a man and Gordon Brown called an old lady a bigot. Better to stay schtum than get in the that sort of hot water. Instead, Labour responded on Twitter with a link to a voter registration page and an insistence that any further response would be to spread the disinformation Humphris was spouting. Cue division on social media. Supporters insisted Starmer was best to broadly ignore an angry, rude man. And that the Labour leader’s security were right to bundle Humphris away. Bear in mind a sitting MP, Jo Cox, was murdered in the course of campaigning just five years ago. Opponents of Starmer were enraged. One particularly on point tweet came from Martin Daubney, Brexit party MEP turned man-that-shouts-at-lockdowns-on-the-internet. He accused Starmer of demanding “sooner, harder, longer lockdowns”. Which is true. But anyone who values human life over beer now concedes that every lockdown so far should’ve started sooner and laster longer. How to have a productive disagreement The reaction online summed up exactly why Starmer failed in his response. It sounds counter intuitive, but in fact the best way to bridge divides is to argue. Humphris was talking nonsense. Starmer should have taken him on. But he should not have set out to diminish, destroy or mock the pub owner. He should have sought to disagree productively. A recent book called Conflicted by ad man turned centrist guru Ian Leslie could have helped. At its core is a plea for more conflict, conducted with empathy and civility, to harness disagreement to useful ends. There is value in hearing a range of voices. And, crucial for Starmer’s chances in any and all of the upcoming elections (apart from the London mayoral election which Labour doesn’t need to worry about because the Tory candidate is a clown and Sadiq Khan has bagged the all important endorsement of New Rules singer Dua Lipa) is the fact that folk respect reasoned debate and politicians who stand up for themselves. Starmer had an opportunity to show that he stands up for something, engages with other points of view, and disagrees respectfully and productively
Voir plus
2021-05-15 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 849 votes : 88-0 com : 18 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
SACK SAGE! Mass Media Covid Treachery: Tony Gosling Bristol Freedom Rally College Green 15May21 | (Y) | | |
Thanks to Tyrant Finder Channel for the pictures - but could his reserve cameraman please not wander off in the middle of filming in future! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8Ygd5QI2csjHVmFmkZ5TOg SACK SAGE! Mass Media Covid Treachery: Tony Gosling Bristol Freedom Rally College Green 15May21 https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/whistleblower-newspaper-industry-chiefs-criminally-negligent-over-covid-scaremongering Whistleblower: Newspaper industry chiefs criminally negligent over Covid scaremongering by UK COLUMN REPORTERS Monday, 10th May 2021 We publish the below anonymously for self-evident reasons. Working for what is essentially the propaganda unit of our government is something I am deeply ashamed of. I have been a journalist at newspapers across the UK for 25 years and feel the industry I work in has grossly let down the public during this alleged pandemic. To protect my position as a legacy media journalist, I am unwilling to say where I work, whom I work for, or who I am, but I am sharing these thoughts with UK Column readers to hopefully give them an insight into how and why my industry has got things so badly wrong. For the last year I have been deeply troubled by what has been happening and would gladly quit my industry if it wasn’t for having to support my family on a good wage—but I feel like my soul is dying as a result. What I used to hold in high regard, legacy media newspapers, have revealed themselves to be an enormous echo chamber begging readers every day to lock down harder, socially distance further, mask up more often, and to—above all else—get vaccinated as soon as humanly possible. Despite this relentless messaging to comply, not one mention has ever been made in any of the titles I work for of the government’s Yellow Card Scheme that has recorded more than 1,000 deaths shortly after vaccine, to date. As the Government’s own website says, only 10% of vaccine injuries are ever recorded, so we can make that 10,000 deaths and counting. Meanwhile, we have columnists crowing about getting their vaccines, and relentless fearmongering editorials that may as well have been written by Chris Whitty himself. I am disgusted by it all but I do have a handful of colleagues who share my concerns—but we are powerless to do anything, with managers either too scared or too programmed by the propaganda to allow for anything more than occasional snippets of alternative narrative to appear. Wartime delusions The only explanation I can think of for myself, being the only one of my colleagues trying to get counter-narrative in the news pages, is that many of them think their responsibility is to save lives in a time of crisis, as if they were on a wartime footing, and that anything challenging the official narrative would end up with more deaths. It is ironic that their ignorance, cowardice and/or lack of journalistic integrity, probably born out of fear of the virus and/or fear of what others might think of them, is costing thousands of lives of the most vulnerable in our society and the rapid loss of our freedoms. And it has left children at the cusp of having to receive this vaccine without informed consent being given to their parents. It is our duty to present both sides of a story impartially, and in that task we have failed to such an extent that I feel there has been criminal negligence from those at the top of the industry, who must take responsibility for the skewed narrative we have offered for more than a year now. I have had many sleepless nights thinking about the horrors that are happening in hospitals and care homes—and more recently as a result of the vaccines—as a result of the Covid protocols that we as a newspaper industry are turning a blind eye to, or are playing down the significance of. And the devastating fear programming of children that we have become a part of is something that is equally cruel and criminal. I must also add that it has become common practice to describe anything bad that happens in society to be “due to Covid”. No, it is not! It is due to the draconian restrictions that our economy has had its heart ripped out, it is these restrictions that have left the elderly to die alone and in despair within hospitals and care homes. It’s not Covid doing that, but the regulations imposed. The role of the press in bringing about the hate-filled society Through ignorance and a desire to make things seem as terrible as possible—in the misguided belief this would save lives—it has meant we have fanned the flames of fear and helped create the society that the government psychologists wanted, with non-compliance being the subject of social disapproval. In fact it has gone much further than that, with non-compliance avidly hated by many who do conform......
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
SACK SAGE! Mass Media Covid Treachery: Tony Gosling Bristol Freedom Rally College Green 15May21 | (Y) | | |
Thanks to Tyrant Finder Channel for the pictures - but could his reserve cameraman please not wander off in the middle of filming in future! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8Ygd5QI2csjHVmFmkZ5TOg SACK SAGE! Mass Media Covid Treachery: Tony Gosling Bristol Freedom Rally College Green 15May21 https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/whistleblower-newspaper-industry-chiefs-criminally-negligent-over-covid-scaremongering Whistleblower: Newspaper industry chiefs criminally negligent over Covid scaremongering by UK COLUMN REPORTERS Monday, 10th May 2021 We publish the below anonymously for self-evident reasons. Working for what is essentially the propaganda unit of our government is something I am deeply ashamed of. I have been a journalist at newspapers across the UK for 25 years and feel the industry I work in has grossly let down the public during this alleged pandemic. To protect my position as a legacy media journalist, I am unwilling to say where I work, whom I work for, or who I am, but I am sharing these thoughts with UK Column readers to hopefully give them an insight into how and why my industry has got things so badly wrong. For the last year I have been deeply troubled by what has been happening and would gladly quit my industry if it wasn’t for having to support my family on a good wage—but I feel like my soul is dying as a result. What I used to hold in high regard, legacy media newspapers, have revealed themselves to be an enormous echo chamber begging readers every day to lock down harder, socially distance further, mask up more often, and to—above all else—get vaccinated as soon as humanly possible. Despite this relentless messaging to comply, not one mention has ever been made in any of the titles I work for of the government’s Yellow Card Scheme that has recorded more than 1,000 deaths shortly after vaccine, to date. As the Government’s own website says, only 10% of vaccine injuries are ever recorded, so we can make that 10,000 deaths and counting. Meanwhile, we have columnists crowing about getting their vaccines, and relentless fearmongering editorials that may as well have been written by Chris Whitty himself. I am disgusted by it all but I do have a handful of colleagues who share my concerns—but we are powerless to do anything, with managers either too scared or too programmed by the propaganda to allow for anything more than occasional snippets of alternative narrative to appear. Wartime delusions The only explanation I can think of for myself, being the only one of my colleagues trying to get counter-narrative in the news pages, is that many of them think their responsibility is to save lives in a time of crisis, as if they were on a wartime footing, and that anything challenging the official narrative would end up with more deaths. It is ironic that their ignorance, cowardice and/or lack of journalistic integrity, probably born out of fear of the virus and/or fear of what others might think of them, is costing thousands of lives of the most vulnerable in our society and the rapid loss of our freedoms. And it has left children at the cusp of having to receive this vaccine without informed consent being given to their parents. It is our duty to present both sides of a story impartially, and in that task we have failed to such an extent that I feel there has been criminal negligence from those at the top of the industry, who must take responsibility for the skewed narrative we have offered for more than a year now. I have had many sleepless nights thinking about the horrors that are happening in hospitals and care homes—and more recently as a result of the vaccines—as a result of the Covid protocols that we as a newspaper industry are turning a blind eye to, or are playing down the significance of. And the devastating fear programming of children that we have become a part of is something that is equally cruel and criminal. I must also add that it has become common practice to describe anything bad that happens in society to be “due to Covid”. No, it is not! It is due to the draconian restrictions that our economy has had its heart ripped out, it is these restrictions that have left the elderly to die alone and in despair within hospitals and care homes. It’s not Covid doing that, but the regulations imposed. The role of the press in bringing about the hate-filled society Through ignorance and a desire to make things seem as terrible as possible—in the misguided belief this would save lives—it has meant we have fanned the flames of fear and helped create the society that the government psychologists wanted, with non-compliance being the subject of social disapproval. In fact it has gone much further than that, with non-compliance avidly hated by many who do conform......
Voir plus
2021-05-09 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 268 votes : 14-1 com : 4 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Nicola Sturgeon faces uphill struggle for fresh referendum - Scotland's 2021 election inconclusive | (Y) | | |
Boris Johnson exclusive interview: No new Scottish independence referendum, says PM https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/05/07/hartlepool-victory-boris-johnson-ponders-lock-uks-newfound-tory/ Prime Minister tells The Telegraph that vote would be ‘irresponsible’ as Nicola Sturgeon sets up new political battle with Holyrood win By Ben Riley-Smith, 7 May 2021 • 9:58pm Boris Johnson has made clear he would reject calls for a second Scottish independence referendum if Nicola Sturgeon secured an SNP majority at Holyrood. In an interview with The Telegraph, the Prime Minister said: “I think a referendum in the current context is irresponsible and reckless.” The comments set up a political battle over the future of the UK that will loom large for the rest of the year. Ms Sturgeon, the SNP leader, who is set to be returned as Scottish First Minister in the Holyrood elections, said on Friday that she was prepared to push for a second referendum “when the time is right”. It followed Labour suffering a historic by-election defeat in Hartlepool, with a Tory MP elected in the town for the first time since 1964. Sir Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, admitted his party had “lost the trust of the working people” and said the defeat of a traditionally solid Labour seat was “bitterly disappointing”. Khalid Mahmood quit as Labour’s shadow defence minister, accusing the party of having ceded to a “London-based bourgeoisie” and “brigades of woke social media warriors”. The political backlash showed little sign of slowing on Friday night, with criticism from both Labour moderates and the Left leading to speculation that a shadow cabinet reshuffle may be imminent. In a swipe at his successor, Jeremy Corbyn, who remains suspended from the party, accused Sir Keir of “offering nothing” to voters. The full results from “Super Thursday”, a day of elections for councils, mayors, police commissioners, the Scottish and Welsh parliaments and one MP, are still emerging. But signs on Friday night suggested a strong showing in England for the Conservatives, with the Tories making a net gain of seven local authorities and 155 council seats, while Labour was down 142 seats with a net loss of four authorities. Results were reported from 64 out of 143 councils. Results: English Councils In Hartlepool, Jill Mortimer, the Tory candidate, won the seat by 15,529 votes to Labour’s 8,589, a majority of almost 7,000 votes which eclipsed the expectations of insiders in both parties. The seat had been held by Labour since its creation in February 1974. Ms Sturgeon was last night heading for a strong performance in the Holyrood election – although doubts remained over whether she would secure a majority – with the Scottish Tories losing two of the seven constituencies they won in the 2016 election. The SNP had won 38 out of 46 constituency seats declared last night. The First Minister had argued that an SNP majority would give the party a mandate for a second independence referendum. The party won a majority in 2011, leading to the 2014 independence referendum. However, asked during a visit to Hartlepool on Friday if a Nationalist majority meant there was a mandate for another vote, Mr Johnson told The Telegraph: “I think that count is still taking place and we’ll have to see what happens. I listened to the Scottish election carefully. “My impression was that they [the SNP] moved away from the idea of a referendum, and I think very wisely. “Because I don’t think this is anything like the time to have more constitutional wrangling, to be talking about ripping our country apart, when actually people want to heal our economy and bounce forward together. That’s what people want.” Asked about claims he had privately said he would never agree to a second referendum, Mr Johnson said: “I think a referendum in the current context is irresponsible and reckless. Let me leave it at that.” Pushed on what he would do if Ms Sturgeon attempted to hold a referendum unilaterally, without permission from Westminster, Mr Johnson said: “Well, as I say, I think that there’s no case now for such a thing … I don’t think it’s what the times call for at all.” Ms Sturgeon, who was re-elected as an MSP representing Glasgow, indicated she would pursue a second referendum if she achieved a majority. Ms Sturgeon said: “If that is indeed the outcome of this election, I pledge today to get back to work immediately to continue to steer the country through the crisis of Covid, to continue to lead this country into recovery from Covid. “And then, when the time is right, to offer this country the choice of a better future.”
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Nicola Sturgeon faces uphill struggle for fresh referendum - Scotland's 2021 election inconclusive | (Y) | | |
Boris Johnson exclusive interview: No new Scottish independence referendum, says PM https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/05/07/hartlepool-victory-boris-johnson-ponders-lock-uks-newfound-tory/ Prime Minister tells The Telegraph that vote would be ‘irresponsible’ as Nicola Sturgeon sets up new political battle with Holyrood win By Ben Riley-Smith, 7 May 2021 • 9:58pm Boris Johnson has made clear he would reject calls for a second Scottish independence referendum if Nicola Sturgeon secured an SNP majority at Holyrood. In an interview with The Telegraph, the Prime Minister said: “I think a referendum in the current context is irresponsible and reckless.” The comments set up a political battle over the future of the UK that will loom large for the rest of the year. Ms Sturgeon, the SNP leader, who is set to be returned as Scottish First Minister in the Holyrood elections, said on Friday that she was prepared to push for a second referendum “when the time is right”. It followed Labour suffering a historic by-election defeat in Hartlepool, with a Tory MP elected in the town for the first time since 1964. Sir Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, admitted his party had “lost the trust of the working people” and said the defeat of a traditionally solid Labour seat was “bitterly disappointing”. Khalid Mahmood quit as Labour’s shadow defence minister, accusing the party of having ceded to a “London-based bourgeoisie” and “brigades of woke social media warriors”. The political backlash showed little sign of slowing on Friday night, with criticism from both Labour moderates and the Left leading to speculation that a shadow cabinet reshuffle may be imminent. In a swipe at his successor, Jeremy Corbyn, who remains suspended from the party, accused Sir Keir of “offering nothing” to voters. The full results from “Super Thursday”, a day of elections for councils, mayors, police commissioners, the Scottish and Welsh parliaments and one MP, are still emerging. But signs on Friday night suggested a strong showing in England for the Conservatives, with the Tories making a net gain of seven local authorities and 155 council seats, while Labour was down 142 seats with a net loss of four authorities. Results were reported from 64 out of 143 councils. Results: English Councils In Hartlepool, Jill Mortimer, the Tory candidate, won the seat by 15,529 votes to Labour’s 8,589, a majority of almost 7,000 votes which eclipsed the expectations of insiders in both parties. The seat had been held by Labour since its creation in February 1974. Ms Sturgeon was last night heading for a strong performance in the Holyrood election – although doubts remained over whether she would secure a majority – with the Scottish Tories losing two of the seven constituencies they won in the 2016 election. The SNP had won 38 out of 46 constituency seats declared last night. The First Minister had argued that an SNP majority would give the party a mandate for a second independence referendum. The party won a majority in 2011, leading to the 2014 independence referendum. However, asked during a visit to Hartlepool on Friday if a Nationalist majority meant there was a mandate for another vote, Mr Johnson told The Telegraph: “I think that count is still taking place and we’ll have to see what happens. I listened to the Scottish election carefully. “My impression was that they [the SNP] moved away from the idea of a referendum, and I think very wisely. “Because I don’t think this is anything like the time to have more constitutional wrangling, to be talking about ripping our country apart, when actually people want to heal our economy and bounce forward together. That’s what people want.” Asked about claims he had privately said he would never agree to a second referendum, Mr Johnson said: “I think a referendum in the current context is irresponsible and reckless. Let me leave it at that.” Pushed on what he would do if Ms Sturgeon attempted to hold a referendum unilaterally, without permission from Westminster, Mr Johnson said: “Well, as I say, I think that there’s no case now for such a thing … I don’t think it’s what the times call for at all.” Ms Sturgeon, who was re-elected as an MSP representing Glasgow, indicated she would pursue a second referendum if she achieved a majority. Ms Sturgeon said: “If that is indeed the outcome of this election, I pledge today to get back to work immediately to continue to steer the country through the crisis of Covid, to continue to lead this country into recovery from Covid. “And then, when the time is right, to offer this country the choice of a better future.”
Voir plus
2021-05-08 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 428 votes : 49-2 com : 10 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Dr John Lee UK Topsy Turvey Govt Is Following Dates Not Data | (Y) | | |
John Lee The fatal mistakes which led to lockdown https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-strong-was-the-scientific-advice-behind-lockdown Modelling is no substitute for quality data and research From magazine issue: 11 July 2020 Over the past few weeks, my sense of the surreal has been increasing. At a time when rational interpretation of the Covid data indicates that we should be getting back to normal, we instead see an elaboration of arbitrary responses. These are invariably explained as being ‘guided by science’. In fact, they are doing something rather different: being guided by models, bad data and subjective opinion. Some of those claiming to be ‘following the science’ seem not to understand the meaning of the word. At the outset, we were told the virus was so pernicious that it could, if not confronted, claim half a million lives in the UK alone. Viruses have been chasing men since before we climbed down from the trees. Our bodies fight them off and learn in the process. Let’s go back to the idea of Covid taking half a million lives: a figure produced by modelling. But how does modelling relate to ‘the science’ we heard so much about? An important point — often overlooked — is that modelling is not science, for the simple reason that a prediction made by a scientist (using a model or not) is just opinion. To be classified as science, a prediction or theory needs to be able to be tested, and potentially falsified. Einstein is revered as a great scientist not just for the complexity of general relativity but because of the way his theory enabled scientists to predict things. This forward--looking capacity, repeatedly verified, is what makes it a scientific theory. The ability to look backwards and retrofit a theory to the data via a model is not nearly so impressive. Take, for example, a curve describing the way a virus affects a population in terms of the number of infections (or deaths). We can use models to claim that lockdown had a dramatic effect on the spread, or none at all. We can use them to claim that social distancing was vital, or useless. Imperial College London has looked at the data and claimed lockdown has saved three million lives. A study from Massachusetts looked at the data and concluded that lockdown ‘might not have saved any life’. We can, through modelling alone, choose pretty much any version of the past we like. The only way to get an idea of the real-world accuracy of models is by using them to predict what will happen — and then by testing those predictions. And this is the third problem with the current approach: a wilful determination to ignore the quality of the information being used to set Covid policy. In medical science there is a well-known classification of data quality known as ‘the hierarchy of evidence’. This seven-level system gives an idea of how much weight can be placed on any given study or recommendation. Near the top, at Level 2, we find randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where a new approach is tried on a group of patients and compared with (for example) a placebo. The results of such studies are pretty reliable, with little room for bias to creep in. A systematic review of several RCTs is the highest, most reliable form of medical evidence: Level 1. Further down (Levels 5 and 6) comes evidence from much less compelling, descriptive-only studies looking for a pattern, without using controls. This is where we find virtually all evidence pertaining to Covid-19 policy: lockdown, social distancing, face masks, quarantine, R-numbers, second waves, you name it. And — to speed things up — most Covid research was not peer- reviewed. Right at the bottom of the hierarchy — Level 7 — is the opinion of authorities or reports of expert committees. This is because, among other things, ‘authorities’ often fail to change their minds in the face of new evidence. Committees, containing diversity of opinion and inevitably being cautious, often issue compromise recommendations that are scientifically non-valid. Ministers talk about ‘following the science’. But the advice of Sage (or any committee of scientists) is the least reliable form of evidence there is. Such is the quality of decision-making in the process generating our lockdown narrative. An early maintained but exaggerated belief in the lethality of the virus reinforced by modelling that was almost data-free, then amplified by further modelling with no proven predictive value. All summed up by recommendations from a committee based on qualitative data that hasn’t even been peer-reviewed....
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Dr John Lee UK Topsy Turvey Govt Is Following Dates Not Data | (Y) | | |
John Lee The fatal mistakes which led to lockdown https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/how-strong-was-the-scientific-advice-behind-lockdown Modelling is no substitute for quality data and research From magazine issue: 11 July 2020 Over the past few weeks, my sense of the surreal has been increasing. At a time when rational interpretation of the Covid data indicates that we should be getting back to normal, we instead see an elaboration of arbitrary responses. These are invariably explained as being ‘guided by science’. In fact, they are doing something rather different: being guided by models, bad data and subjective opinion. Some of those claiming to be ‘following the science’ seem not to understand the meaning of the word. At the outset, we were told the virus was so pernicious that it could, if not confronted, claim half a million lives in the UK alone. Viruses have been chasing men since before we climbed down from the trees. Our bodies fight them off and learn in the process. Let’s go back to the idea of Covid taking half a million lives: a figure produced by modelling. But how does modelling relate to ‘the science’ we heard so much about? An important point — often overlooked — is that modelling is not science, for the simple reason that a prediction made by a scientist (using a model or not) is just opinion. To be classified as science, a prediction or theory needs to be able to be tested, and potentially falsified. Einstein is revered as a great scientist not just for the complexity of general relativity but because of the way his theory enabled scientists to predict things. This forward--looking capacity, repeatedly verified, is what makes it a scientific theory. The ability to look backwards and retrofit a theory to the data via a model is not nearly so impressive. Take, for example, a curve describing the way a virus affects a population in terms of the number of infections (or deaths). We can use models to claim that lockdown had a dramatic effect on the spread, or none at all. We can use them to claim that social distancing was vital, or useless. Imperial College London has looked at the data and claimed lockdown has saved three million lives. A study from Massachusetts looked at the data and concluded that lockdown ‘might not have saved any life’. We can, through modelling alone, choose pretty much any version of the past we like. The only way to get an idea of the real-world accuracy of models is by using them to predict what will happen — and then by testing those predictions. And this is the third problem with the current approach: a wilful determination to ignore the quality of the information being used to set Covid policy. In medical science there is a well-known classification of data quality known as ‘the hierarchy of evidence’. This seven-level system gives an idea of how much weight can be placed on any given study or recommendation. Near the top, at Level 2, we find randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where a new approach is tried on a group of patients and compared with (for example) a placebo. The results of such studies are pretty reliable, with little room for bias to creep in. A systematic review of several RCTs is the highest, most reliable form of medical evidence: Level 1. Further down (Levels 5 and 6) comes evidence from much less compelling, descriptive-only studies looking for a pattern, without using controls. This is where we find virtually all evidence pertaining to Covid-19 policy: lockdown, social distancing, face masks, quarantine, R-numbers, second waves, you name it. And — to speed things up — most Covid research was not peer- reviewed. Right at the bottom of the hierarchy — Level 7 — is the opinion of authorities or reports of expert committees. This is because, among other things, ‘authorities’ often fail to change their minds in the face of new evidence. Committees, containing diversity of opinion and inevitably being cautious, often issue compromise recommendations that are scientifically non-valid. Ministers talk about ‘following the science’. But the advice of Sage (or any committee of scientists) is the least reliable form of evidence there is. Such is the quality of decision-making in the process generating our lockdown narrative. An early maintained but exaggerated belief in the lethality of the virus reinforced by modelling that was almost data-free, then amplified by further modelling with no proven predictive value. All summed up by recommendations from a committee based on qualitative data that hasn’t even been peer-reviewed....
Voir plus
2021-05-05 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 621 votes : 59-0 com : 8 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
UKs Globalist Mayors & Green Fascists Tony Gosling Piers Corbyn London Mayor on Richie Allen 04 | (Y) | | |
OUR Home Secretary Priti Patel likes to be thought of as having a tough approach to crime and disorder. If she wants to show she can live up to that image, she should be encouraging the police to be ready to stamp down on an imminent attack on the rights of Cambridge people to go about their lives as normal. Extinction Rebellion, the Fascism-Lite of the green movement, are about to try to shut down parts of Cambridge for a whole week if their demands aren’t met. The protest will include blocking roads and various unspecified actions, all likely to cause chaos. XR claim this will be non-violent; but the intended disruption still has the potential to do real harm. This isn’t legitimate protest: it’s nasty interference in the rights of others. The self-importance of Extinction Rebellion is staggering. They are clamouring for Cambridge city council to cede its authority and decision-making powers on issues affecting climate – that’s just about everything in modern life – to a ‘Citizens’ Assembly’. Never mind that Cambridge councillors were elected in a free and fair contest to fill that role. Never mind that the council derives its legitimacy from democratic processes. Apparently the council isn’t the right sort of Citizens’ Assembly. Extinction Rebellion want their own in charge, one that is compliant and will come to come to the right decisions. And they are happy to use blackmail to get it. Of course Extinction Rebellion have already had chances to take part in Cambridge politics and to try to get its citizens on their side. They could have put up candidates in the local elections last May or in December’s general election. That’s a right they share with any other political grouping. They have exactly the same opportunities to participate in politics, local or national, as anyone else. They are free to campaign, organise or electioneer as they wish. But standing in elections means exposure to full and sustained scrutiny. You might lose! In true Leninist style, they seem to believe that the population should be allowed choices about them only when under the movement’s safe direction, in forums packed with the gullible and faithful. Messy events like elections are for others. Extinction Rebellion are political cowards, frightened to have their ideas examined and tested in a full contest. They know that despite Greta Thunberg, David Attenborough and the BBC, they still haven’t convinced the public that we should drop our living standards to Victorian levels or power our economy on unicorn breath. Though we must not hamper anyone’s rights to demonstrate lawfully, Extinction Rebellion’s petulant and aggressive behaviour must not be allowed to cross the line into illegality, as it has so often before. The freedom of the wider community to go peaceably about their business must not be interfered with. Given how the movement likes to advertise its plans in advance, the authorities have no excuse to be unprepared. The first protesters to turn up should be met by the police and clearly told that obstructions to the public will not be tolerated. Anyone not complying should be dealt with quickly and firmly under the law. This should be the police’s starting position, not something their commanders are pressured into after a lengthy period with no proper control as we saw in last year’s London protests. The government and Ms Patel need to show that they will hold police management accountable for making it happen from day one. Bullies, green-tinged or not, should be confronted and challenged.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
UKs Globalist Mayors & Green Fascists Tony Gosling Piers Corbyn London Mayor on Richie Allen 04 | (Y) | | |
OUR Home Secretary Priti Patel likes to be thought of as having a tough approach to crime and disorder. If she wants to show she can live up to that image, she should be encouraging the police to be ready to stamp down on an imminent attack on the rights of Cambridge people to go about their lives as normal. Extinction Rebellion, the Fascism-Lite of the green movement, are about to try to shut down parts of Cambridge for a whole week if their demands aren’t met. The protest will include blocking roads and various unspecified actions, all likely to cause chaos. XR claim this will be non-violent; but the intended disruption still has the potential to do real harm. This isn’t legitimate protest: it’s nasty interference in the rights of others. The self-importance of Extinction Rebellion is staggering. They are clamouring for Cambridge city council to cede its authority and decision-making powers on issues affecting climate – that’s just about everything in modern life – to a ‘Citizens’ Assembly’. Never mind that Cambridge councillors were elected in a free and fair contest to fill that role. Never mind that the council derives its legitimacy from democratic processes. Apparently the council isn’t the right sort of Citizens’ Assembly. Extinction Rebellion want their own in charge, one that is compliant and will come to come to the right decisions. And they are happy to use blackmail to get it. Of course Extinction Rebellion have already had chances to take part in Cambridge politics and to try to get its citizens on their side. They could have put up candidates in the local elections last May or in December’s general election. That’s a right they share with any other political grouping. They have exactly the same opportunities to participate in politics, local or national, as anyone else. They are free to campaign, organise or electioneer as they wish. But standing in elections means exposure to full and sustained scrutiny. You might lose! In true Leninist style, they seem to believe that the population should be allowed choices about them only when under the movement’s safe direction, in forums packed with the gullible and faithful. Messy events like elections are for others. Extinction Rebellion are political cowards, frightened to have their ideas examined and tested in a full contest. They know that despite Greta Thunberg, David Attenborough and the BBC, they still haven’t convinced the public that we should drop our living standards to Victorian levels or power our economy on unicorn breath. Though we must not hamper anyone’s rights to demonstrate lawfully, Extinction Rebellion’s petulant and aggressive behaviour must not be allowed to cross the line into illegality, as it has so often before. The freedom of the wider community to go peaceably about their business must not be interfered with. Given how the movement likes to advertise its plans in advance, the authorities have no excuse to be unprepared. The first protesters to turn up should be met by the police and clearly told that obstructions to the public will not be tolerated. Anyone not complying should be dealt with quickly and firmly under the law. This should be the police’s starting position, not something their commanders are pressured into after a lengthy period with no proper control as we saw in last year’s London protests. The government and Ms Patel need to show that they will hold police management accountable for making it happen from day one. Bullies, green-tinged or not, should be confronted and challenged.
Voir plus
2021-05-05 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 318 votes : 31-0 com : 2 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
G7: Invite-Only World Government Wannabees. Did Washington or Moscow end decade long war in Syria? | (Y) | | |
The G-7 ministerial talks are laying the foundation for a summit of leaders from those countries in June, also in Britain. In addition to Britain and the United States, the G-7 includes Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan. Australia, India, South Africa, South Korea and Brunei are also taking part in this week’s talks. After the G-7 meetings, Blinken is scheduled to travel to Ukraine to meet with President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and other senior government officials. State Department spokesman Ned Price said in a statement that Blinken will “reaffirm unwavering U.S. support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in the face of Russia’s ongoing aggression.” https://www.voanews.com/usa/g-7-nations-vow-end-syrian-war-top-us-diplomat-says G-7 Nations Vow to End Syrian War, Top US Diplomat Says http://www.urmedium.com/c/presstv/74170 By Nike Ching May 04, 2021 02:13 PM European High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs, Josep Borrell, German Foreign Affairs Minister Heiko Maas, Italy… G-7 foreign ministers convene in London for the first face-to-face meeting in two years, May 4, 2021. (Stefan Rousseau/Pool via Reuters) U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Tuesday that the Group of 7 industrialized nations have vowed to end the 10-year civil war in Syria. My @G7 counterparts and I reaffirmed our commitment to a political resolution for ending the conflict in Syria,” Blinken tweeted as he and other G-7 members attended their first in-person meetings in two years. The Syrian conflict was among a range of world issues to be discussed by foreign ministers representing the G-7 nations during meetings in London. Others include relations with China and Russia, the coup in Myanmar, and the situation in Afghanistan. Britain’s foreign office said in Tuesday’s sessions Foreign Secretary Dominic Rabb “will lead discussions on pressing geopolitical issues that threaten to undermine democracy, freedoms and human rights.” Raab said the talks are “an opportunity to bring together open, democratic societies and demonstrate unity at a time when it is much needed to tackle shared challenges and rising threats.” He is expected to urge G-7 members to sanction individuals and entities connected to Myanmar’s military junta, to support arms embargoes and to boost humanitarian aid to the people of Myanmar.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
G7: Invite-Only World Government Wannabees. Did Washington or Moscow end decade long war in Syria? | (Y) | | |
The G-7 ministerial talks are laying the foundation for a summit of leaders from those countries in June, also in Britain. In addition to Britain and the United States, the G-7 includes Canada, France, Germany, Italy and Japan. Australia, India, South Africa, South Korea and Brunei are also taking part in this week’s talks. After the G-7 meetings, Blinken is scheduled to travel to Ukraine to meet with President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and other senior government officials. State Department spokesman Ned Price said in a statement that Blinken will “reaffirm unwavering U.S. support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in the face of Russia’s ongoing aggression.” https://www.voanews.com/usa/g-7-nations-vow-end-syrian-war-top-us-diplomat-says G-7 Nations Vow to End Syrian War, Top US Diplomat Says http://www.urmedium.com/c/presstv/74170 By Nike Ching May 04, 2021 02:13 PM European High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs, Josep Borrell, German Foreign Affairs Minister Heiko Maas, Italy… G-7 foreign ministers convene in London for the first face-to-face meeting in two years, May 4, 2021. (Stefan Rousseau/Pool via Reuters) U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Tuesday that the Group of 7 industrialized nations have vowed to end the 10-year civil war in Syria. My @G7 counterparts and I reaffirmed our commitment to a political resolution for ending the conflict in Syria,” Blinken tweeted as he and other G-7 members attended their first in-person meetings in two years. The Syrian conflict was among a range of world issues to be discussed by foreign ministers representing the G-7 nations during meetings in London. Others include relations with China and Russia, the coup in Myanmar, and the situation in Afghanistan. Britain’s foreign office said in Tuesday’s sessions Foreign Secretary Dominic Rabb “will lead discussions on pressing geopolitical issues that threaten to undermine democracy, freedoms and human rights.” Raab said the talks are “an opportunity to bring together open, democratic societies and demonstrate unity at a time when it is much needed to tackle shared challenges and rising threats.” He is expected to urge G-7 members to sanction individuals and entities connected to Myanmar’s military junta, to support arms embargoes and to boost humanitarian aid to the people of Myanmar.
Voir plus
2021-05-04 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 670 votes : 61-1 com : 11 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Albert Pike Henry Kissinger Covid19 Reupload of Edited Censored Interview | (Y) | | |
Timeline of the New World Order https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/09/02/timeline-of-the-new-world-order/ 1796 – Freemasonry Freemasonry becomes a major issue in the presidential election in the United States. John Adams wins the election by opposing Masonry, and his son, John Quincy Adams, warns of the dire threat to the nation posed by the Masonic Lodges: “I do conscientiously and sincerely believe that the Order of Freemasonry, if not the greatest, is one of the greatest moral and political evils under which the Union is now laboring.” 1797 – John Robison John Robison, Professor of Natural History at Edinburgh University in Scotland, publishes a book entitled “Proofs of a Conspiracy” in which he reveals that Adam Weishaupt had attempted to recruit him. He exposes the diabolical aims of the Illuminati to the world. 1821 – George W. F. Hegel George W. F. Hegel formulates what is called the Hegelian dialectic – the process by which Illuminati objectives are achieved. According to the Hegelian dialectic, thesis plus antithesis equals synthesis. In other words, first you foment a crisis. Then there is an enormous public outcry that something must be done about the problem. So you offer a solution that brings about the changes you really wanted all along, but which people would have been unwilling to accept initially. 1828 – Mayer Amschel Rothschild Mayer Amschel Rothschild, who finances the Illuminati, expresses his utter contempt for national governments which attempt to regulate International Bankers such as him: “Allow me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who writes the laws.” 1848 — Moses Mordecai Marx Levy Moses Mordecai Marx Levy, alias Karl Marx, writes “The Communist Manifesto.” Marx is a member of an Illuminati front organization called the League of the Just. He not only advocates economic and political changes; he advocates moral and spiritual changes as well. He believes the family should be abolished, and that all children should be raised by a central authority. He expresses his attitude toward God by saying: “We must war against all prevailing ideas of religion, of the state, of country, of patriotism. The idea of God is the keynote of a perverted civilization. It must be destroyed.” Jan. 22, 1870 – Albert Pike In a letter to Italian revolutionary leader Giuseppe Mazzini, Albert Pike – Sovereign Grand Commander of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry – announces the establishment of a secret society within a secret society: “We must create a super rite, which will remain unknown, to which we will call those Masons of high degree of whom we shall select. With regard to our brothers in Masonry, these men must be pledges to the strictest secrecy. Through this supreme rite, we will govern all Freemasonry which will become the one international center, the more powerful because its direction will be unknown.” This ultra-secret organization is called The New and Reformed Paladian Rite. (This is why about 95% of the men involved in Masonry don’t have a clue as to what the objectives of the organization actually are. They are under the delusion that it’s just a fine community organization doing good works.) 1875 – Helena Petrovna Blavatsky Russian occultist Helena Petrovna Blavatsky founds the Theosophical Society. Madame Blavatsky claims that Tibetan holy men in the Himilayas, whom she refers to as the Masters of Wisdom, communicated with her in London by telepathy. She insists that the Christians have it all backwards – that Satan is good, and God is evil. She writes: “The Christians and scientists must be made to respect their Indian betters. The Wisdom of India, her philosophy and achievement, must be made known in Europe and America.” 1884 – The Fabian Society The Fabian Society is founded in Great Britain to promote Socialism. The Fabian Society takes its name from the Roman General Fabius Maximus, who fought Hannibal’s army in small debilitating skirmishes, rather than attempting one decisive battle. July 14, 1889 – Albert Pike reveals who is the true object of Masonic worship Albert Pike issues instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the world on July 14, 1889. He reveals who is the true object of Masonic worship: “To you, Sovereign Grand Instructors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees: The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine.”
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Albert Pike Henry Kissinger Covid19 Reupload of Edited Censored Interview | (Y) | | |
Timeline of the New World Order https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2020/09/02/timeline-of-the-new-world-order/ 1796 – Freemasonry Freemasonry becomes a major issue in the presidential election in the United States. John Adams wins the election by opposing Masonry, and his son, John Quincy Adams, warns of the dire threat to the nation posed by the Masonic Lodges: “I do conscientiously and sincerely believe that the Order of Freemasonry, if not the greatest, is one of the greatest moral and political evils under which the Union is now laboring.” 1797 – John Robison John Robison, Professor of Natural History at Edinburgh University in Scotland, publishes a book entitled “Proofs of a Conspiracy” in which he reveals that Adam Weishaupt had attempted to recruit him. He exposes the diabolical aims of the Illuminati to the world. 1821 – George W. F. Hegel George W. F. Hegel formulates what is called the Hegelian dialectic – the process by which Illuminati objectives are achieved. According to the Hegelian dialectic, thesis plus antithesis equals synthesis. In other words, first you foment a crisis. Then there is an enormous public outcry that something must be done about the problem. So you offer a solution that brings about the changes you really wanted all along, but which people would have been unwilling to accept initially. 1828 – Mayer Amschel Rothschild Mayer Amschel Rothschild, who finances the Illuminati, expresses his utter contempt for national governments which attempt to regulate International Bankers such as him: “Allow me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who writes the laws.” 1848 — Moses Mordecai Marx Levy Moses Mordecai Marx Levy, alias Karl Marx, writes “The Communist Manifesto.” Marx is a member of an Illuminati front organization called the League of the Just. He not only advocates economic and political changes; he advocates moral and spiritual changes as well. He believes the family should be abolished, and that all children should be raised by a central authority. He expresses his attitude toward God by saying: “We must war against all prevailing ideas of religion, of the state, of country, of patriotism. The idea of God is the keynote of a perverted civilization. It must be destroyed.” Jan. 22, 1870 – Albert Pike In a letter to Italian revolutionary leader Giuseppe Mazzini, Albert Pike – Sovereign Grand Commander of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry – announces the establishment of a secret society within a secret society: “We must create a super rite, which will remain unknown, to which we will call those Masons of high degree of whom we shall select. With regard to our brothers in Masonry, these men must be pledges to the strictest secrecy. Through this supreme rite, we will govern all Freemasonry which will become the one international center, the more powerful because its direction will be unknown.” This ultra-secret organization is called The New and Reformed Paladian Rite. (This is why about 95% of the men involved in Masonry don’t have a clue as to what the objectives of the organization actually are. They are under the delusion that it’s just a fine community organization doing good works.) 1875 – Helena Petrovna Blavatsky Russian occultist Helena Petrovna Blavatsky founds the Theosophical Society. Madame Blavatsky claims that Tibetan holy men in the Himilayas, whom she refers to as the Masters of Wisdom, communicated with her in London by telepathy. She insists that the Christians have it all backwards – that Satan is good, and God is evil. She writes: “The Christians and scientists must be made to respect their Indian betters. The Wisdom of India, her philosophy and achievement, must be made known in Europe and America.” 1884 – The Fabian Society The Fabian Society is founded in Great Britain to promote Socialism. The Fabian Society takes its name from the Roman General Fabius Maximus, who fought Hannibal’s army in small debilitating skirmishes, rather than attempting one decisive battle. July 14, 1889 – Albert Pike reveals who is the true object of Masonic worship Albert Pike issues instructions to the 23 Supreme Councils of the world on July 14, 1889. He reveals who is the true object of Masonic worship: “To you, Sovereign Grand Instructors General, we say this, that you may repeat it to the Brethren of the 32nd, 31st and 30th degrees: The Masonic religion should be, by all of us initiates of the high degrees, maintained in the purity of the Luciferian doctrine.”
Voir plus
2021-05-01 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 465 votes : 33-2 com : 4 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
What To Do About Israel? Journalist Israel Shamir on www.thisweek org uk 16 Aoril 2021 | (Y) | | |
What To Do About Israel? Journalist Israel Shamir on www.thisweek org uk 16 Aoril 2021
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
What To Do About Israel? Journalist Israel Shamir on www.thisweek org uk 16 Aoril 2021 | (Y) | | |
What To Do About Israel? Journalist Israel Shamir on www.thisweek org uk 16 Aoril 2021
Voir plus
2021-04-29 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 320 votes : 30-1 com : 9 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Bristol City Council About to Throw Fifty Covid Homeless Onto The Streets, ITV Westcountry Apr2021 | (Y) | | |
'I fear being on the streets' - homeless people in Bristol 'frightened' as support due to end https://www.itv.com/news/westcountry/2021-04-29/i-fear-being-on-the-streets-homeless-people-in-bristol-frightened-as-support-due-to-end Thursday 29 April 2021 Bristol's homeless charities are pleading for the public to support them in keeping dozens of people off the streets when the Government's emergency coronavirus support ends. Damian, 30, is one of more than 50 people in the city reportedly at risk of homelessness when the Government stops financially helping local authorities provide shelter for rough sleepers during the pandemic. "I think about it being winter, out in the cold and lying outside. I walk past people sleeping and I think, that could be me," Damian told ITV West Country. "I fear being on the streets because I've never been in such a situation. It's frightening. It's very frightening. I don't know how people are used to it, because I can't get my head around it." 1,400+ Number of rough sleepers moved into emergency accommodation during pandemic 50+ Number of people at risk of homelessness once support ends in May According to Bristol City Council, more than 1,400 people have been moved into emergency accommodation as a result of measures introduced during the pandemic. The authority said it is committed to making sure as many people as possible do not return to the streets, such as offering rooms in a new form of temporary accommodation. Damian, 30, wanted to be kept anonymous - but fears being made homeless in a few weeks time. Caring in Bristol, one of the city's homeless charities, believes more than 50 people are at imminent risk of homelessness once the Government support ends on 17 May. Funding for the ‘Everyone In’ initiative is coming to an end, and while Bristol City Council has committed to continue to house people until May 17th, there is a need to find more permanent housing for people currently in emergency accommodation. Spokesperson, Caring in Bristol According to the charity, those who are still staying in hotels face being pushed out onto the streets unless local charities get donations to help to pay for their stays. These include sanctuary seekers and EEA nationals - many of whom don't have any access to welfare benefits or social housing. Places such as The Julian Trust Night Shelter would usually provide a lifeline for many individuals, the charities say, but they remain closed due to coronavirus restrictions and guidance from Public Health England. Fortunately the Julian Trust has been able to use some of its funds to pay for temporary accommodation for nine of the 'at risk' individuals who would have potentially been on the streets from mid-May. This leaves more than 50 people, like Damian, "frightened" of what their futures look like in a few weeks' time. "It has been fabulous," Damian said, on having a roof over his head during the pandemic. "The best opportunity I could have had." "Frightening" time for people found homeless for first time The struggle to help Bath's rough sleepers during lockdown Now some of Bristol's most prominent charities and organisations are asking the public and local businesses to donate and help them support those at risk. Ben Richardson, Caring in Bristol director, said: "As a local charity we are proud of the huge community effort we have made together during Covid to house and support people irrespective of their immigration status or right and ability to work. "Unfortunately, we are now facing the devastating prospect of some of these people being pushed back onto the streets. This will see all of that good work undone, with serious and potentially life-threatening implications for some very vulnerable people in our city. "The Government can choose not to do this. They must take into account the emergency public health restrictions we face together, and act immediately to fund and safeguard the support cities like Bristol can offer."
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Bristol City Council About to Throw Fifty Covid Homeless Onto The Streets, ITV Westcountry Apr2021 | (Y) | | |
'I fear being on the streets' - homeless people in Bristol 'frightened' as support due to end https://www.itv.com/news/westcountry/2021-04-29/i-fear-being-on-the-streets-homeless-people-in-bristol-frightened-as-support-due-to-end Thursday 29 April 2021 Bristol's homeless charities are pleading for the public to support them in keeping dozens of people off the streets when the Government's emergency coronavirus support ends. Damian, 30, is one of more than 50 people in the city reportedly at risk of homelessness when the Government stops financially helping local authorities provide shelter for rough sleepers during the pandemic. "I think about it being winter, out in the cold and lying outside. I walk past people sleeping and I think, that could be me," Damian told ITV West Country. "I fear being on the streets because I've never been in such a situation. It's frightening. It's very frightening. I don't know how people are used to it, because I can't get my head around it." 1,400+ Number of rough sleepers moved into emergency accommodation during pandemic 50+ Number of people at risk of homelessness once support ends in May According to Bristol City Council, more than 1,400 people have been moved into emergency accommodation as a result of measures introduced during the pandemic. The authority said it is committed to making sure as many people as possible do not return to the streets, such as offering rooms in a new form of temporary accommodation. Damian, 30, wanted to be kept anonymous - but fears being made homeless in a few weeks time. Caring in Bristol, one of the city's homeless charities, believes more than 50 people are at imminent risk of homelessness once the Government support ends on 17 May. Funding for the ‘Everyone In’ initiative is coming to an end, and while Bristol City Council has committed to continue to house people until May 17th, there is a need to find more permanent housing for people currently in emergency accommodation. Spokesperson, Caring in Bristol According to the charity, those who are still staying in hotels face being pushed out onto the streets unless local charities get donations to help to pay for their stays. These include sanctuary seekers and EEA nationals - many of whom don't have any access to welfare benefits or social housing. Places such as The Julian Trust Night Shelter would usually provide a lifeline for many individuals, the charities say, but they remain closed due to coronavirus restrictions and guidance from Public Health England. Fortunately the Julian Trust has been able to use some of its funds to pay for temporary accommodation for nine of the 'at risk' individuals who would have potentially been on the streets from mid-May. This leaves more than 50 people, like Damian, "frightened" of what their futures look like in a few weeks' time. "It has been fabulous," Damian said, on having a roof over his head during the pandemic. "The best opportunity I could have had." "Frightening" time for people found homeless for first time The struggle to help Bath's rough sleepers during lockdown Now some of Bristol's most prominent charities and organisations are asking the public and local businesses to donate and help them support those at risk. Ben Richardson, Caring in Bristol director, said: "As a local charity we are proud of the huge community effort we have made together during Covid to house and support people irrespective of their immigration status or right and ability to work. "Unfortunately, we are now facing the devastating prospect of some of these people being pushed back onto the streets. This will see all of that good work undone, with serious and potentially life-threatening implications for some very vulnerable people in our city. "The Government can choose not to do this. They must take into account the emergency public health restrictions we face together, and act immediately to fund and safeguard the support cities like Bristol can offer."
Voir plus
2021-04-29 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 327 votes : 28-1 com : 5 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Is EU a US puppet superstate? Diplomatic ties with Moscow follow Washington's lead downhill | (Y) | | |
EU puppet superstate of the US - diplomatic ties with Moscow follow Washington's lead downhill The State of EU relations with Russia and the Eastern Neighbourhood Wouter Zweers https://www.clingendael.org/pub/2018/clingendael-state-of-the-union-2018/9-eu-relations-with-russia-and-the-eastern-neighbourhood/ Introduction Stabilisation, resilience and security - these are the keywords of the latest of a series of European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) reviews, aiming to ‘respond to the new challenges of an evolving neighbourhood’.[125] Such challenges increasingly result from geopolitical tensions over the Eastern Neighbourhood between the European Union (EU) and Russia, and come on top of the EU’s continuous struggle to fight corruption and promote its norms regarding human rights, democracy and the rule of law in the countries to its Eastern vicinity. The EU recognises that geopolitical competition from Russia increasingly thwarts its own policy agenda towards its neighbours. However, the ENP’s renewed focus on security, with its increased attention to information resilience and cybersecurity, has not yet proven to be capable of addressing these issues. Politically, the EU is struggling to develop a unitary and comprehensive answer to Russian assertiveness in the region. The Union constantly needs to balance between constructive engagement (e.g. through dialogue) and credible deterrence (e.g. by means of sanctions). Meanwhile, individual Member States continue to pursue bilateral policies based on their individual interests. These differences mean the EU faces a number of pressing challenges for its current and future agenda towards the East, which include coping with the Donbass conflict, extending the sanctions regime towards Russia, and finding more effective ways to give the EU’s normative disposition in the region new momentum. The Donbass war and Minsk agreements The Donbass war is entering its fifth year and continues to claim casualties, hinder EU relations with Russia and thwart stability in Ukraine. Russia has an increasing interest to turn it into yet another protracted conflict to stall Ukraine’s development and the implementation of the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement. In that way, Moscow tests EU commitment to restoring peace, which it considers weak.[126] So far, however, the EU is only marginally involved in the Minsk peace process, with the OSCE, France and Germany taking active roles through the so-called Normandy format instead. Yet, the absence of this issue on the EU-wide agenda makes momentum in the peace process dependent on individual countries, who can be preoccupied by domestic political priorities, such as is now the case in Germany as a result of its elections outcomes.[127] The absence of EU ownership of the conflict could moreover harm consensus within the EU on the issue. Russia considers the cases of Brexit and the Catalonian push for independence just as the latest examples of fragile EU unity, and is believed – although at a decentralised level – to actively pursue a divide-and-conquer strategy among European electorates and Member States.[128] A greater commitment from the side of the EU would not only increase the Union’s internal unity, but also enhance the international legitimacy of the peace efforts, and possibly alter the calculations of the parties involved. So far, Russia’s own calculation is that non-resolution is in its best interest. The International Peacekeeping Mission unexpectedly put forward by President Putin in September 2017 is, in the form as proposed by Moscow, nothing more than a poisoned chalice actually contributing to ‘freezing’ the conflict by legitimizing it internationally instead of settling it.[129] Through its proposal Russia has aimed to put the ball back into the court of Ukraine, which has neglected to implement the political provisions of Minsk – i.e., local elections in the Donbass region and a special status for the Donbass in the Ukrainian constitution – arguing that military provisions should be implemented first. Russia´s and Ukraine´s contradictory understanding on the sequencing of the Minsk II Provisions has been a major reason for the current stalemate, a situation which the ´Steinmeier formula´ has sought, but not succeeded, to overcome.[130] An effective peacekeeping mission capable of breaking this deadlock would require a comprehensive mandate. This mandate should allow for ensuring the ceasefire and the withdrawal of the Russian military as well as Ukraine’s sovereignty over the region, while simultaneously supporting local governance and the organisation of elections. European leaders should thereby make clear to Moscow that this is also for its own benefit.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Is EU a US puppet superstate? Diplomatic ties with Moscow follow Washington's lead downhill | (Y) | | |
EU puppet superstate of the US - diplomatic ties with Moscow follow Washington's lead downhill The State of EU relations with Russia and the Eastern Neighbourhood Wouter Zweers https://www.clingendael.org/pub/2018/clingendael-state-of-the-union-2018/9-eu-relations-with-russia-and-the-eastern-neighbourhood/ Introduction Stabilisation, resilience and security - these are the keywords of the latest of a series of European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) reviews, aiming to ‘respond to the new challenges of an evolving neighbourhood’.[125] Such challenges increasingly result from geopolitical tensions over the Eastern Neighbourhood between the European Union (EU) and Russia, and come on top of the EU’s continuous struggle to fight corruption and promote its norms regarding human rights, democracy and the rule of law in the countries to its Eastern vicinity. The EU recognises that geopolitical competition from Russia increasingly thwarts its own policy agenda towards its neighbours. However, the ENP’s renewed focus on security, with its increased attention to information resilience and cybersecurity, has not yet proven to be capable of addressing these issues. Politically, the EU is struggling to develop a unitary and comprehensive answer to Russian assertiveness in the region. The Union constantly needs to balance between constructive engagement (e.g. through dialogue) and credible deterrence (e.g. by means of sanctions). Meanwhile, individual Member States continue to pursue bilateral policies based on their individual interests. These differences mean the EU faces a number of pressing challenges for its current and future agenda towards the East, which include coping with the Donbass conflict, extending the sanctions regime towards Russia, and finding more effective ways to give the EU’s normative disposition in the region new momentum. The Donbass war and Minsk agreements The Donbass war is entering its fifth year and continues to claim casualties, hinder EU relations with Russia and thwart stability in Ukraine. Russia has an increasing interest to turn it into yet another protracted conflict to stall Ukraine’s development and the implementation of the Ukraine-EU Association Agreement. In that way, Moscow tests EU commitment to restoring peace, which it considers weak.[126] So far, however, the EU is only marginally involved in the Minsk peace process, with the OSCE, France and Germany taking active roles through the so-called Normandy format instead. Yet, the absence of this issue on the EU-wide agenda makes momentum in the peace process dependent on individual countries, who can be preoccupied by domestic political priorities, such as is now the case in Germany as a result of its elections outcomes.[127] The absence of EU ownership of the conflict could moreover harm consensus within the EU on the issue. Russia considers the cases of Brexit and the Catalonian push for independence just as the latest examples of fragile EU unity, and is believed – although at a decentralised level – to actively pursue a divide-and-conquer strategy among European electorates and Member States.[128] A greater commitment from the side of the EU would not only increase the Union’s internal unity, but also enhance the international legitimacy of the peace efforts, and possibly alter the calculations of the parties involved. So far, Russia’s own calculation is that non-resolution is in its best interest. The International Peacekeeping Mission unexpectedly put forward by President Putin in September 2017 is, in the form as proposed by Moscow, nothing more than a poisoned chalice actually contributing to ‘freezing’ the conflict by legitimizing it internationally instead of settling it.[129] Through its proposal Russia has aimed to put the ball back into the court of Ukraine, which has neglected to implement the political provisions of Minsk – i.e., local elections in the Donbass region and a special status for the Donbass in the Ukrainian constitution – arguing that military provisions should be implemented first. Russia´s and Ukraine´s contradictory understanding on the sequencing of the Minsk II Provisions has been a major reason for the current stalemate, a situation which the ´Steinmeier formula´ has sought, but not succeeded, to overcome.[130] An effective peacekeeping mission capable of breaking this deadlock would require a comprehensive mandate. This mandate should allow for ensuring the ceasefire and the withdrawal of the Russian military as well as Ukraine’s sovereignty over the region, while simultaneously supporting local governance and the organisation of elections. European leaders should thereby make clear to Moscow that this is also for its own benefit.
Voir plus
2021-04-27 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 494 votes : 38-1 com : 4 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Syrian missile strikes near Israels secret Dimona nuclear weapons plant triggering warning sirens | (Y) | | |
Missile fired from Syria landed near the secretive Dimona nuclear weapons facility triggering warning sirens Syrian missile hit near Dimona nuclear site showed Israel's vulnerability in asymmetrical war: Analyst https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/04/24/650187/Syrian-missile-hit-near-Dimona-nuclear-site-showed-Israel-s-vulnerability-in-asymmetrical-war-Analyst Saturday, 24 April 2021 10:30 AM [ Last Update: Saturday, 24 April 2021 11:36 AM ] US Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a rally with fellow Democrats before voting on H.R. 1, or the People Act, on the East Steps of the US Capitol on March 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. (AFP photo) This file picture shows a partial view of the top-secret Dimona nuclear site at Negev desert in the southern part of the Israeli-occupied territories. (Photo by the Times of Israel online newspaper) A political analyst and former American diplomat says the landing of a Syrian missile near the top-secret Dimona nuclear site in the southern part of the Israeli-occupied territories reveals the fact that US-built armament and military systems cannot protect the Tel Aviv regime in case of an asymmetrical wear. “It would seem more reasonable to imply that Israel is no longer all-powerful, despite its extremely close ties to the US. American weapons cannot protect it from asymmetric warfare,” J. Michael Springmann told Press TV in an exclusive interview on Saturday. He noted that the occupied Palestinian territories, ever since Israel was created back on May 14, 1948, had not come under attack by anything other than rockets developed indigenously by Palestinian resistance groups, emphasizing that the missile launch was in response to incessant Israeli acts of aggression against crisis-hit Syria. 'Syria missile' lands near Israeli military nuclear facility Dimona 'Syria missile' lands near Israeli military nuclear facility Dimona Syrian missile fired towards an Israeli warplane overflies its target, landing near the occupying regime’s military nuclear facility Dimona. “It would be more reasonable to speculate that Syria, because of near constant Israeli attacks, finally decided to strike back,” the commentator highlighted. Springmann also dismissed accounts by certain Western media outlets that the projectile launched from Syria was an “errant” anti-aircraft rocket, underlining that a loud explosion was heard in Jerusalem al-Quds, situated 150 kilometers (93 miles) away from Dimona nuclear reactor. “A small anti-aircraft rocket doesn’t have that much capability,” he said. “Whatever the type of projectile, Israel’s US-supplied Iron Dome and Patriot missile defenses were somehow unable to defend [the regime] against a wayward air defense rocket,” Springmann commented. Early on Thursday, a Syrian surface-to-air missile landed near Israel’s top-secret nuclear reactor, triggering warning sirens in the Negev Desert. The Israel army failed in its attempt to intercept the missile using its air defense systems, according to the Jerusalem Post daily newspaper. The Israeli military said that in response to the launch, it attacked several missile batteries on neighboring Syria. Syria’s official news agency SANA said its air defenses intercepted the Israeli attack in the Damascus suburbs. “Air defenses intercepted the rockets and downed most of them,” the agency said. Israel has tightly withheld information about its nuclear weapons program, but the regime is estimated to be keeping at least 90 nuclear warheads in its arsenal, according to the non-profit organization Federation of American Scientists (FAS). The warheads, FAS said, had been produced from plutonium obtained at the Dimona facility’s heavy water reactor. Israel in possession of close to 100 nuclear warheads: SIPRI Israel in possession of close to 100 nuclear warheads: SIPRI A new report reveals that the Israeli regime, which has a long-standing policy of not commenting on its nuclear arsenal, is in possession of approximately 100 nuclear warheads. Dimona, which is widely believed to be key to Israel’s nuclear arms manufacturing program, was built with covert assistance from the French government and activated sometime between 1962–1964, according to reports. Israel has acknowledged the existence of the Dimona nuclear reactor, but neither confirms nor denies the purpose of the nukes manufacturing facility. Environmentalists have warned that Dimona — one of the world’s oldest nuclear facilities — could pose grave environmental and security threats to those living in the area and to the entire Middle East, calling on the regime to shut down the complex. Turning a deaf ear to international calls for nuclear transparency, the Tel Aviv regime has so far refused, with the US’s invariable support, to join the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that is aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear weapons.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Syrian missile strikes near Israels secret Dimona nuclear weapons plant triggering warning sirens | (Y) | | |
Missile fired from Syria landed near the secretive Dimona nuclear weapons facility triggering warning sirens Syrian missile hit near Dimona nuclear site showed Israel's vulnerability in asymmetrical war: Analyst https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/04/24/650187/Syrian-missile-hit-near-Dimona-nuclear-site-showed-Israel-s-vulnerability-in-asymmetrical-war-Analyst Saturday, 24 April 2021 10:30 AM [ Last Update: Saturday, 24 April 2021 11:36 AM ] US Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) (L) talks with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a rally with fellow Democrats before voting on H.R. 1, or the People Act, on the East Steps of the US Capitol on March 08, 2019 in Washington, DC. (AFP photo) This file picture shows a partial view of the top-secret Dimona nuclear site at Negev desert in the southern part of the Israeli-occupied territories. (Photo by the Times of Israel online newspaper) A political analyst and former American diplomat says the landing of a Syrian missile near the top-secret Dimona nuclear site in the southern part of the Israeli-occupied territories reveals the fact that US-built armament and military systems cannot protect the Tel Aviv regime in case of an asymmetrical wear. “It would seem more reasonable to imply that Israel is no longer all-powerful, despite its extremely close ties to the US. American weapons cannot protect it from asymmetric warfare,” J. Michael Springmann told Press TV in an exclusive interview on Saturday. He noted that the occupied Palestinian territories, ever since Israel was created back on May 14, 1948, had not come under attack by anything other than rockets developed indigenously by Palestinian resistance groups, emphasizing that the missile launch was in response to incessant Israeli acts of aggression against crisis-hit Syria. 'Syria missile' lands near Israeli military nuclear facility Dimona 'Syria missile' lands near Israeli military nuclear facility Dimona Syrian missile fired towards an Israeli warplane overflies its target, landing near the occupying regime’s military nuclear facility Dimona. “It would be more reasonable to speculate that Syria, because of near constant Israeli attacks, finally decided to strike back,” the commentator highlighted. Springmann also dismissed accounts by certain Western media outlets that the projectile launched from Syria was an “errant” anti-aircraft rocket, underlining that a loud explosion was heard in Jerusalem al-Quds, situated 150 kilometers (93 miles) away from Dimona nuclear reactor. “A small anti-aircraft rocket doesn’t have that much capability,” he said. “Whatever the type of projectile, Israel’s US-supplied Iron Dome and Patriot missile defenses were somehow unable to defend [the regime] against a wayward air defense rocket,” Springmann commented. Early on Thursday, a Syrian surface-to-air missile landed near Israel’s top-secret nuclear reactor, triggering warning sirens in the Negev Desert. The Israel army failed in its attempt to intercept the missile using its air defense systems, according to the Jerusalem Post daily newspaper. The Israeli military said that in response to the launch, it attacked several missile batteries on neighboring Syria. Syria’s official news agency SANA said its air defenses intercepted the Israeli attack in the Damascus suburbs. “Air defenses intercepted the rockets and downed most of them,” the agency said. Israel has tightly withheld information about its nuclear weapons program, but the regime is estimated to be keeping at least 90 nuclear warheads in its arsenal, according to the non-profit organization Federation of American Scientists (FAS). The warheads, FAS said, had been produced from plutonium obtained at the Dimona facility’s heavy water reactor. Israel in possession of close to 100 nuclear warheads: SIPRI Israel in possession of close to 100 nuclear warheads: SIPRI A new report reveals that the Israeli regime, which has a long-standing policy of not commenting on its nuclear arsenal, is in possession of approximately 100 nuclear warheads. Dimona, which is widely believed to be key to Israel’s nuclear arms manufacturing program, was built with covert assistance from the French government and activated sometime between 1962–1964, according to reports. Israel has acknowledged the existence of the Dimona nuclear reactor, but neither confirms nor denies the purpose of the nukes manufacturing facility. Environmentalists have warned that Dimona — one of the world’s oldest nuclear facilities — could pose grave environmental and security threats to those living in the area and to the entire Middle East, calling on the regime to shut down the complex. Turning a deaf ear to international calls for nuclear transparency, the Tel Aviv regime has so far refused, with the US’s invariable support, to join the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) that is aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear weapons.
Voir plus
2021-04-23 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 296 votes : 10-0 com : 7 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Bristol #KillTheBill Demo ITV James Ward Bristol Activist Blog DCI James Riccio Avon Somerset Polic | (Y) | | |
Kill the Bill protest: More than 1,000 attend fifth Bristol demo https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-56626401 Protesters blocked the entrance to a motorway as part of Bristol's fifth Kill the Bill protest in less than a fortnight. About 100 people marched from the city centre to the M32, briefly blocking the carriageway before heading back. Police said it closed it to inbound traffic at junction 3 at about 21:30 BST for safety reasons. More than 1,000 people had attended a "peaceful" march through the city centre earlier on Saturday. It was held to oppose the government's Police and Crime Bill. Avon and Somerset Police said officers had sought to "engage with protesters" and to ensure the demonstration took place peacefully. The force "urged" people to "consider alternative ways" of protesting "given that we're still in the midst of the pandemic". Protesters performed a flash mob at College Green with an effigy of Home Secretary Priti Patel ahead of the protest moving across the city from about 16:30 BST. BBC Radio Bristol's Pete Simson, who attended the afternoon's protest, said there was a "festival vibe" at College Green and that it had been "very good natured". About 500 people remained near the city's Cenotaph at about 19:00 following the conclusion of a "peaceful march", police said.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Bristol #KillTheBill Demo ITV James Ward Bristol Activist Blog DCI James Riccio Avon Somerset Polic | (Y) | | |
Kill the Bill protest: More than 1,000 attend fifth Bristol demo https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-56626401 Protesters blocked the entrance to a motorway as part of Bristol's fifth Kill the Bill protest in less than a fortnight. About 100 people marched from the city centre to the M32, briefly blocking the carriageway before heading back. Police said it closed it to inbound traffic at junction 3 at about 21:30 BST for safety reasons. More than 1,000 people had attended a "peaceful" march through the city centre earlier on Saturday. It was held to oppose the government's Police and Crime Bill. Avon and Somerset Police said officers had sought to "engage with protesters" and to ensure the demonstration took place peacefully. The force "urged" people to "consider alternative ways" of protesting "given that we're still in the midst of the pandemic". Protesters performed a flash mob at College Green with an effigy of Home Secretary Priti Patel ahead of the protest moving across the city from about 16:30 BST. BBC Radio Bristol's Pete Simson, who attended the afternoon's protest, said there was a "festival vibe" at College Green and that it had been "very good natured". About 500 people remained near the city's Cenotaph at about 19:00 following the conclusion of a "peaceful march", police said.
Voir plus
2021-04-14 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 275 votes : 11-2 com : 0 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
US still not rejoined JCPOA Europe imposes sanctions IAEA told Iran going for 60% Uranium enrichmen | (Y) | | |
Iran's Rouhani says 60% enrichment is an answer to attack at Natanz site By Reuters Staff https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-natanz/irans-rouhani-says-60-enrichment-is-an-answer-to-attack-at-natanz-site-idUSKBN2C10XL DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran’s move to enrich uranium up to 60% purity is a response to the sabotage at its key nuclear facility, President Hassan Rouhani said on Wednesday, adding the Islamic Republic had no intention of building a nuclear weapon. After an explosion at its Natanz uranium enrichment site on Sunday blamed by Tehran on arch-foe Israel, Iran said it would begin enriching uranium at 60%, a move bringing the fissile material closer to levels suitable for a bomb. It also said it would activate 1,000 advanced centrifuge machines at the site. “Of course, the security and intelligence officials must give the final reports, but apparently it is the crime of the Zionists, and if the Zionists act against our nation, we will answer it,” Rouhani said in a televised cabinet meeting. “Our response to their malice is replacing the damaged centrifuges with more advanced ones and ramping up the enrichment to 60% at the Natanz facility.” Iranian authorities have described the incident as an act of “nuclear terrorism”. Israel, which the Islamic Republic does not recognise, has not formally commented on the matter. The International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, said on Tuesday it had been informed of Iran’s decision. Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with six powers, which it has been breaching since the United States withdrew in 2018 and reimposed sanctions on Tehran, caps the fissile purity to which Tehran can refine uranium at 3.67%. That is well under the 20% achieved before the agreement and far below the 90% suitable for a nuclear weapon. In an apparent bid to heap pressure on U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration that is willing to revive the accord, Iran in recent months has raised enrichment to 20% purity, a level where uranium is considered to be highly enriched. Rouhani, echoing Iran’s stance for decades, said Tehran had no intention to obtain or develop nuclear weapons. France said on Tuesday it was coordinating a response with world powers, including the United States, after Iran said it would begin enriching uranium at 60%. Washington called Iran’s announcement “provocative” and said the U.S. administration was concerned, adding that it called into question Tehran’s seriousness on nuclear talks. Last week, Iran and the global powers held what they described as “constructive” talks to salvage the 2015 accord. The talks will resume on Thursday in Vienna to discuss the sanctions Washington might lift and the nuclear curbs Tehran might observe. “They (Israel) want our hands to be empty in the negotiations, but we will be in the negotiations with a stronger hand,” Rouhani said.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
US still not rejoined JCPOA Europe imposes sanctions IAEA told Iran going for 60% Uranium enrichmen | (Y) | | |
Iran's Rouhani says 60% enrichment is an answer to attack at Natanz site By Reuters Staff https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-nuclear-natanz/irans-rouhani-says-60-enrichment-is-an-answer-to-attack-at-natanz-site-idUSKBN2C10XL DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran’s move to enrich uranium up to 60% purity is a response to the sabotage at its key nuclear facility, President Hassan Rouhani said on Wednesday, adding the Islamic Republic had no intention of building a nuclear weapon. After an explosion at its Natanz uranium enrichment site on Sunday blamed by Tehran on arch-foe Israel, Iran said it would begin enriching uranium at 60%, a move bringing the fissile material closer to levels suitable for a bomb. It also said it would activate 1,000 advanced centrifuge machines at the site. “Of course, the security and intelligence officials must give the final reports, but apparently it is the crime of the Zionists, and if the Zionists act against our nation, we will answer it,” Rouhani said in a televised cabinet meeting. “Our response to their malice is replacing the damaged centrifuges with more advanced ones and ramping up the enrichment to 60% at the Natanz facility.” Iranian authorities have described the incident as an act of “nuclear terrorism”. Israel, which the Islamic Republic does not recognise, has not formally commented on the matter. The International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, said on Tuesday it had been informed of Iran’s decision. Iran’s 2015 nuclear deal with six powers, which it has been breaching since the United States withdrew in 2018 and reimposed sanctions on Tehran, caps the fissile purity to which Tehran can refine uranium at 3.67%. That is well under the 20% achieved before the agreement and far below the 90% suitable for a nuclear weapon. In an apparent bid to heap pressure on U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration that is willing to revive the accord, Iran in recent months has raised enrichment to 20% purity, a level where uranium is considered to be highly enriched. Rouhani, echoing Iran’s stance for decades, said Tehran had no intention to obtain or develop nuclear weapons. France said on Tuesday it was coordinating a response with world powers, including the United States, after Iran said it would begin enriching uranium at 60%. Washington called Iran’s announcement “provocative” and said the U.S. administration was concerned, adding that it called into question Tehran’s seriousness on nuclear talks. Last week, Iran and the global powers held what they described as “constructive” talks to salvage the 2015 accord. The talks will resume on Thursday in Vienna to discuss the sanctions Washington might lift and the nuclear curbs Tehran might observe. “They (Israel) want our hands to be empty in the negotiations, but we will be in the negotiations with a stronger hand,” Rouhani said.
Voir plus
2021-04-11 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 503 votes : 19-3 com : 18 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Northern Ireland Loyalist Brexit Riots Were 'Inevitable' After Disastrous Irish Sea Border Decision | (Y) | | |
NORTHERN IRELAND RIOTS Sunday, 11 April 2021 9:00 PM https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/04/11/649262/NORTHERN-IRELAND-RIOTS In this edition of the Debate, Press TV interviews its correspondent in London Amina Taylor [who gives the latest on the situation in Northern Ireland], Irish journalist and political commentator Andree Murphy from Belfast, Northern Ireland, and investigative journalist Tony Gosling from Bristol, England to look at the root-cause of the unrest in Northern Ireland and find the answer to this question: how dangerous is the current situation in Northern Ireland? Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses: www.presstv.ir www.presstv.co.uk www.presstv.tv
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Northern Ireland Loyalist Brexit Riots Were 'Inevitable' After Disastrous Irish Sea Border Decision | (Y) | | |
NORTHERN IRELAND RIOTS Sunday, 11 April 2021 9:00 PM https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/04/11/649262/NORTHERN-IRELAND-RIOTS In this edition of the Debate, Press TV interviews its correspondent in London Amina Taylor [who gives the latest on the situation in Northern Ireland], Irish journalist and political commentator Andree Murphy from Belfast, Northern Ireland, and investigative journalist Tony Gosling from Bristol, England to look at the root-cause of the unrest in Northern Ireland and find the answer to this question: how dangerous is the current situation in Northern Ireland? Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses: www.presstv.ir www.presstv.co.uk www.presstv.tv
Voir plus
2021-04-08 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 476 votes : 42-3 com : 9 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
UK/Saudi War On Yemen aiming toward wider war? Fresh retaliatory drone strike against Saudi air bas | (Y) | | |
Yemeni forces launch fresh retaliatory drone strike against Saudi air base: Spokesman https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/04/07/648927/Yemeni-army-drone-strike-Saudi-Arabia-Khamis-Mushait The Yemeni army says it has launched a fresh drone strike on a major airbase in Saudi Arabia in retaliation for the Riyadh regime’s ongoing military aggression and blockade against the war-torn impoverished country. Spokesman for the Yemeni Armed Forces Brigadier General Yahya Saree announced late on Tuesday that army troops and allied fighters from Popular Committees had hit sensitive targets in King Khalid airbase in the Saudi city of Khamis Mushait, some 884 kilometers south of the Saudi capital Riyadh. The Yemeni army says it has launched a fresh drone strike on a major airbase in Saudi Arabia in retaliation for the Riyadh regime’s ongoing military aggression and blockade against the war-torn impoverished country. Spokesman for the Yemeni Armed Forces Brigadier General Yahya Saree announced late on Tuesday that army troops and allied fighters from Popular Committees had hit sensitive targets in King Khalid airbase in the Saudi city of Khamis Mushait, some 884 kilometers south of the Saudi capital Riyadh. Yemen's Arabic-language al-Masirah television network cited Saree as saying that the retaliatory attack was carried out by two of the country's domestically-developed Qasef-2K (Striker-2K) combat drones. Saree stressed that the strike was “accurate,” and said the attack came in response to the continuing aggression and brutal siege on his country. Yemen’s Air Force carried out a number of operations against sensitive and important sites in Saudi Arabia last month, targeting Abha International Airport as well as the King Khalid Air Base in Khamis Mushait.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
UK/Saudi War On Yemen aiming toward wider war? Fresh retaliatory drone strike against Saudi air bas | (Y) | | |
Yemeni forces launch fresh retaliatory drone strike against Saudi air base: Spokesman https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/04/07/648927/Yemeni-army-drone-strike-Saudi-Arabia-Khamis-Mushait The Yemeni army says it has launched a fresh drone strike on a major airbase in Saudi Arabia in retaliation for the Riyadh regime’s ongoing military aggression and blockade against the war-torn impoverished country. Spokesman for the Yemeni Armed Forces Brigadier General Yahya Saree announced late on Tuesday that army troops and allied fighters from Popular Committees had hit sensitive targets in King Khalid airbase in the Saudi city of Khamis Mushait, some 884 kilometers south of the Saudi capital Riyadh. The Yemeni army says it has launched a fresh drone strike on a major airbase in Saudi Arabia in retaliation for the Riyadh regime’s ongoing military aggression and blockade against the war-torn impoverished country. Spokesman for the Yemeni Armed Forces Brigadier General Yahya Saree announced late on Tuesday that army troops and allied fighters from Popular Committees had hit sensitive targets in King Khalid airbase in the Saudi city of Khamis Mushait, some 884 kilometers south of the Saudi capital Riyadh. Yemen's Arabic-language al-Masirah television network cited Saree as saying that the retaliatory attack was carried out by two of the country's domestically-developed Qasef-2K (Striker-2K) combat drones. Saree stressed that the strike was “accurate,” and said the attack came in response to the continuing aggression and brutal siege on his country. Yemen’s Air Force carried out a number of operations against sensitive and important sites in Saudi Arabia last month, targeting Abha International Airport as well as the King Khalid Air Base in Khamis Mushait.
Voir plus
2021-04-05 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 761 votes : 58-4 com : 18 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
US Experts Evidence Lab Leak, Contradict WHO Peter Daszak Probe, Steve Hilton Next Revolution 4Apr2 | (Y) | | |
Follow The Next Revolution on Twitter https://twitter.com/NextRevFNC Follow Steve Hilton on Twitter https://twitter.com/SteveHiltonx The Next Revolution Fox News https://www.fox.com/the-next-revolution-with-steve-hilton/ Recent clips from The Next Revolution https://www.foxnews.com/person/h/steve-hilton This Show https://www.fox.com/watch/9bc1ce096c89e250cef904d32b13a9db/ Former CDC director suggests Covid-19 'escaped' from Wuhan lab https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/former-cdc-director-suggests-covid-19-escaped-wuhan-lab/ The comments from Dr Robert Redfield, a key figure in the US pandemic response under Donald Trump, come ahead of an anticipated WHO report By Sarah Newey, GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY CORRESPONDENT 26 March 2021 • 4:08pm Dr Robert Redfield a key figure in the US pandemic response under President Donald Trump Dr Robert Redfield a key figure in the US pandemic response under President Donald Trump CREDIT: MANDEL NGAN/AFP A former top US health official has suggested the coronavirus “escaped” from a laboratory in Wuhan, China and began circulating as early as September 2019. Dr Robert Redfield, who led America’s coronavirus response as the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under President Donald Trump, told CNN he thought it was “most likely” that the virus emerged in a laboratory-related incident. “I'm of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathology in Wuhan was from a laboratory – escaped,” Dr Redfield said. “Other people don't believe that. That's fine. Science will eventually figure it out.” He stressed that he was “not implying any intentionality” in a potential lab leak, but that “it’s not unusual for respiratory pathogens that are being worked on in a laboratory to infect the laboratory worker”. Dr Redfield added that he guesses the virus “started transmitting somewhere in September, October, in Wuhan”. The interview, recorded in January, has been aired just days before a World Health Organization-led team publishes a highly anticipated report, which will outline the findings from a trip to Wuhan earlier this year to study the origins of the pandemic. At a press conference in February international scientists taking part in the mission said that while “all hypotheses remain open”, their research to date suggests it is “highly unlikely” that the virus emerged in a laboratory-related incident. Instead, they said, Sars-Cov-2 most likely jumped from bats to humans via an as-yet-unknown intermediary host. The team added that they had found no evidence to suggest the virus was spreading widely before December 2019. While most experts expected inconclusive findings – establishing the origins of diseases usually takes years, if not decades – the lack of a “smoking gun” has only heightened fierce debates around the virus’ emergence amid growing international tensions. There have also been some concerns from researchers that the WHO team, who worked in collaboration with Chinese experts, may not have had access to all available raw data. The former CDC chief, who led the pre-eminent institution during much of the first year of the coronavirus pandemic, is a controversial figure. In the early part of his career he was accused of misrepresenting data and had close links to Americans for a Sound Aids/HIV Policy (ASAP), an evangelical-funded lobby group which promoted “abstinence” over condom use as a means of fighting the HIV epidemic. It also lobbied against free needles for drug addicts. His pandemic response under President Trump has also attracted criticism from some quarters. In the CNN interview, Dr Redfield insisted his view that the virus escaped from a lab “is only opinion”. He said he believes it makes more “biological sense” that an “efficient” virus which spreads so easily was developed in a lab. Members of the WHO-led team in Wuhan visit the Wuhan Institute of Virology in February CREDIT: REUTERS/Thomas Peter The Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab relatively close to the wet market linked to the emergence of Sars-Cov-2, is well known internationally for its research into coronaviruses. After the interview clip aired Dr Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, stressed there “are a number of theories” about the origin of Covid-19. “Dr Redfield was mentioning that he was giving an opinion as to a possibility, but again, there are other alternatives – others, that most people hold by,” he said during a White House Covid-19 response team briefing on Friday. Earlier this month the Dutch virologist Prof Marion Koopmans, a member of the WHO team, said the possibility of a laboratory-related incident was “discussed openly” during the Wuhan trip, but no evidence supporting the scenario was found.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
US Experts Evidence Lab Leak, Contradict WHO Peter Daszak Probe, Steve Hilton Next Revolution 4Apr2 | (Y) | | |
Follow The Next Revolution on Twitter https://twitter.com/NextRevFNC Follow Steve Hilton on Twitter https://twitter.com/SteveHiltonx The Next Revolution Fox News https://www.fox.com/the-next-revolution-with-steve-hilton/ Recent clips from The Next Revolution https://www.foxnews.com/person/h/steve-hilton This Show https://www.fox.com/watch/9bc1ce096c89e250cef904d32b13a9db/ Former CDC director suggests Covid-19 'escaped' from Wuhan lab https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/former-cdc-director-suggests-covid-19-escaped-wuhan-lab/ The comments from Dr Robert Redfield, a key figure in the US pandemic response under Donald Trump, come ahead of an anticipated WHO report By Sarah Newey, GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY CORRESPONDENT 26 March 2021 • 4:08pm Dr Robert Redfield a key figure in the US pandemic response under President Donald Trump Dr Robert Redfield a key figure in the US pandemic response under President Donald Trump CREDIT: MANDEL NGAN/AFP A former top US health official has suggested the coronavirus “escaped” from a laboratory in Wuhan, China and began circulating as early as September 2019. Dr Robert Redfield, who led America’s coronavirus response as the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under President Donald Trump, told CNN he thought it was “most likely” that the virus emerged in a laboratory-related incident. “I'm of the point of view that I still think the most likely etiology of this pathology in Wuhan was from a laboratory – escaped,” Dr Redfield said. “Other people don't believe that. That's fine. Science will eventually figure it out.” He stressed that he was “not implying any intentionality” in a potential lab leak, but that “it’s not unusual for respiratory pathogens that are being worked on in a laboratory to infect the laboratory worker”. Dr Redfield added that he guesses the virus “started transmitting somewhere in September, October, in Wuhan”. The interview, recorded in January, has been aired just days before a World Health Organization-led team publishes a highly anticipated report, which will outline the findings from a trip to Wuhan earlier this year to study the origins of the pandemic. At a press conference in February international scientists taking part in the mission said that while “all hypotheses remain open”, their research to date suggests it is “highly unlikely” that the virus emerged in a laboratory-related incident. Instead, they said, Sars-Cov-2 most likely jumped from bats to humans via an as-yet-unknown intermediary host. The team added that they had found no evidence to suggest the virus was spreading widely before December 2019. While most experts expected inconclusive findings – establishing the origins of diseases usually takes years, if not decades – the lack of a “smoking gun” has only heightened fierce debates around the virus’ emergence amid growing international tensions. There have also been some concerns from researchers that the WHO team, who worked in collaboration with Chinese experts, may not have had access to all available raw data. The former CDC chief, who led the pre-eminent institution during much of the first year of the coronavirus pandemic, is a controversial figure. In the early part of his career he was accused of misrepresenting data and had close links to Americans for a Sound Aids/HIV Policy (ASAP), an evangelical-funded lobby group which promoted “abstinence” over condom use as a means of fighting the HIV epidemic. It also lobbied against free needles for drug addicts. His pandemic response under President Trump has also attracted criticism from some quarters. In the CNN interview, Dr Redfield insisted his view that the virus escaped from a lab “is only opinion”. He said he believes it makes more “biological sense” that an “efficient” virus which spreads so easily was developed in a lab. Members of the WHO-led team in Wuhan visit the Wuhan Institute of Virology in February CREDIT: REUTERS/Thomas Peter The Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab relatively close to the wet market linked to the emergence of Sars-Cov-2, is well known internationally for its research into coronaviruses. After the interview clip aired Dr Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, stressed there “are a number of theories” about the origin of Covid-19. “Dr Redfield was mentioning that he was giving an opinion as to a possibility, but again, there are other alternatives – others, that most people hold by,” he said during a White House Covid-19 response team briefing on Friday. Earlier this month the Dutch virologist Prof Marion Koopmans, a member of the WHO team, said the possibility of a laboratory-related incident was “discussed openly” during the Wuhan trip, but no evidence supporting the scenario was found.
Voir plus
2021-04-04 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 429 votes : 31-0 com : 6 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Macron Aids US WWIII Push Isolating Iran: Quietly Tears Up JCPOA Nuclear Deal Imposes US Sanctions | (Y) | | |
Press TV exclusive: Iran rules out step-by-step lifting of sanctions Saturday, 03 April 2021 https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/04/03/648640/Iran-Khatibzadeh-JCPOA In an exclusive interview with Press TV, Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh rules out any step-by-step lifting of sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic under former US president Donald Trump. "As has been clearly stated many times, no step-by-step plan is being considered," Khatibzadeh said on Saturday. “The definitive policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is the lifting of all US sanctions, whether those which Trump reimposed after withdrawing from the JCPOA or those which he initiated, as well as sanctions imposed under any other heading," he said. "Obviously, this lifting of sanctions must be effective and must be verified by Iran," Khatibzadeh added. His remarks came in response to claims made by US State Department deputy spokeswoman Jalina Porter about a planned meeting by representatives of Iran and other countries in Vienna Tuesday to discuss the troubled 2015 nuclear deal. Restoring the nuclear agreement would be a major step, nearly three years after Trump scrapped it and imposed new sanctions or reimposed others lifted under the deal, forcing Iran to take a series of "remedial" measures in response to the decision. Porter said Friday that the discussion would focus on “the nuclear steps that Iran would need to take in order to return to compliance with the terms of the JCPOA”, using initials for what is formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. In the talks, American officials would be down the hall while British, German, French, Chinese and Russian officials meet with Iran. And that would be joined with discussion of “the sanctions relief steps that the United States would need to take in order to return to compliance, as well,” Porter said, an acknowledgment that the United States is currently in violation of the accord. Khatibzadeh stressed that "the suspension of Iran's remedial measures and their reversal will take place only after the lifting of all sanctions and its verification" by the Islamic Republic. In a tweet on Friday, Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said the aim of the Vienna session would be to “rapidly finalise sanction-lifting & nuclear measures for choreographed removal of all sanctions, followed by Iran ceasing remedial measures". "No Iran-US meeting. Unnecessary,” he added Friday. American officials have said they were willing to meet directly with the Iranians, but the Iranian government has insisted on working through the Europeans, a stance which Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi reiterated Friday. “We only negotiate with the members of the JCPOA. The parties that are now known as the P4+1 will be our negotiating partners. They can talk to the other sides as they wish. We have no direct or indirect dialogue with the Americans,” he said. Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses: www.presstv.ir www.presstv.co.uk www.presstv.tv
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Macron Aids US WWIII Push Isolating Iran: Quietly Tears Up JCPOA Nuclear Deal Imposes US Sanctions | (Y) | | |
Press TV exclusive: Iran rules out step-by-step lifting of sanctions Saturday, 03 April 2021 https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2021/04/03/648640/Iran-Khatibzadeh-JCPOA In an exclusive interview with Press TV, Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh rules out any step-by-step lifting of sanctions imposed on the Islamic Republic under former US president Donald Trump. "As has been clearly stated many times, no step-by-step plan is being considered," Khatibzadeh said on Saturday. “The definitive policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is the lifting of all US sanctions, whether those which Trump reimposed after withdrawing from the JCPOA or those which he initiated, as well as sanctions imposed under any other heading," he said. "Obviously, this lifting of sanctions must be effective and must be verified by Iran," Khatibzadeh added. His remarks came in response to claims made by US State Department deputy spokeswoman Jalina Porter about a planned meeting by representatives of Iran and other countries in Vienna Tuesday to discuss the troubled 2015 nuclear deal. Restoring the nuclear agreement would be a major step, nearly three years after Trump scrapped it and imposed new sanctions or reimposed others lifted under the deal, forcing Iran to take a series of "remedial" measures in response to the decision. Porter said Friday that the discussion would focus on “the nuclear steps that Iran would need to take in order to return to compliance with the terms of the JCPOA”, using initials for what is formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. In the talks, American officials would be down the hall while British, German, French, Chinese and Russian officials meet with Iran. And that would be joined with discussion of “the sanctions relief steps that the United States would need to take in order to return to compliance, as well,” Porter said, an acknowledgment that the United States is currently in violation of the accord. Khatibzadeh stressed that "the suspension of Iran's remedial measures and their reversal will take place only after the lifting of all sanctions and its verification" by the Islamic Republic. In a tweet on Friday, Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said the aim of the Vienna session would be to “rapidly finalise sanction-lifting & nuclear measures for choreographed removal of all sanctions, followed by Iran ceasing remedial measures". "No Iran-US meeting. Unnecessary,” he added Friday. American officials have said they were willing to meet directly with the Iranians, but the Iranian government has insisted on working through the Europeans, a stance which Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi reiterated Friday. “We only negotiate with the members of the JCPOA. The parties that are now known as the P4+1 will be our negotiating partners. They can talk to the other sides as they wish. We have no direct or indirect dialogue with the Americans,” he said. Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses: www.presstv.ir www.presstv.co.uk www.presstv.tv
Voir plus
2021-03-29 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 631 votes : 54-0 com : 9 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
1m Britons Criminalised? Priti Patel's 'Police State Bill' On Trial On The Streets Of Bristol | (Y) | | |
Bristol Police State Tactics Identical To Those Which Caused 1980s Riots - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UD39_83hWnQ Priti Patel’s new policing bill is threatening our right to protest police protest priti patel https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2021/03/15/priti-patels-new-policing-bill-is-threatening-our-right-to-protest/ Today marks the second reading of the Police, Crime, Sentencing & Courts Bill, which will increase police powers and allow them to clamp down on protests. The bill, spearheaded by home secretary Priti Patel, had already met with criticism, but has come under renewed scrutiny in the wake of police actions at the vigil for Sarah Everard on Clapham Common. During the gathering, police descended to break up the vigil, grabbing those present and arresting some. Their actions were widely criticised as “neither appropriate nor proportionate”. After initially being rumoured to abstain, Labour announced it would vote against the bill as it returns to the House of Commons, saying it imposes “disproportionate controls on free expression”. The bill The government first announced the bill on 9 March. At that time, the Ministry of Justice and the Home Office said it would “strengthen police powers to tackle non-violent protests that have a significant disruptive effect on the public or on access to Parliament”. The legislation will amend the 1986 Public Order Act, making it much easier for the police to impose conditions on both marches and static protests. The 1986 Act limits when conditions can be placed on assemblies to protests that: may result in serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community Related article: Protesters across England and Wales ‘stand in solidarity’ to try and Kill the Bill https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2021/03/28/protesters-across-england-and-wales-stand-in-solidarity-to-try-and-kill-the-bill/ But the new bill gives the police power to impose: such conditions as appear to the officer necessary to prevent the disorder, damage, disruption, impact or intimidation The bill will give the police power to impose conditions on protests based on the amount of noise they make. This allows police to intervene in protests where “noise causes a significant impact on those in the vicinity or serious disruption to the running of an organisation”. And the legislation also gives the home secretary the power, without parliamentary approval, to define “serious disruption” to communities. Police would then be able impose conditions using the definition. Further amendments will make it easier for protestors to be convicted for not complying with conditions placed on protests, saying a person will be “guilty of an offence” if: in the case of a public assembly in England and Wales, at the time the person fails to comply with the condition the person knows or ought to know that the condition has been imposed. Crucially in this section is the loose wording “ought to know”. Under current legislation, the police have to prove that a person was aware of the conditions in order to secure a conviction. Further powers The bill also expands sentencing powers for several offences. Damaging memorials will lead to a maximum ten year sentence, and the maximum penalty for assaulting an emergency worker, which includes police officers, will be doubled to two years. Meanwhile, a new statutory offence of public nuisance will be created for actions causing: serious harm to the public or a section of the public. And the definition of “serious harm” includes actions that cause: serious distress, serious annoyance, serious inconvenience or serious loss of amenity Anyone convicted of this offence faces up to ten years in jail. The police would also obtain further powers to remove “unauthorised encampments”, as well as criminalising trespass and expanding stop-and-search powers. One-person protests and protests near parliament that obstruct vehicle access could also be limited under the new laws.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
1m Britons Criminalised? Priti Patel's 'Police State Bill' On Trial On The Streets Of Bristol | (Y) | | |
Bristol Police State Tactics Identical To Those Which Caused 1980s Riots - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UD39_83hWnQ Priti Patel’s new policing bill is threatening our right to protest police protest priti patel https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2021/03/15/priti-patels-new-policing-bill-is-threatening-our-right-to-protest/ Today marks the second reading of the Police, Crime, Sentencing & Courts Bill, which will increase police powers and allow them to clamp down on protests. The bill, spearheaded by home secretary Priti Patel, had already met with criticism, but has come under renewed scrutiny in the wake of police actions at the vigil for Sarah Everard on Clapham Common. During the gathering, police descended to break up the vigil, grabbing those present and arresting some. Their actions were widely criticised as “neither appropriate nor proportionate”. After initially being rumoured to abstain, Labour announced it would vote against the bill as it returns to the House of Commons, saying it imposes “disproportionate controls on free expression”. The bill The government first announced the bill on 9 March. At that time, the Ministry of Justice and the Home Office said it would “strengthen police powers to tackle non-violent protests that have a significant disruptive effect on the public or on access to Parliament”. The legislation will amend the 1986 Public Order Act, making it much easier for the police to impose conditions on both marches and static protests. The 1986 Act limits when conditions can be placed on assemblies to protests that: may result in serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community Related article: Protesters across England and Wales ‘stand in solidarity’ to try and Kill the Bill https://www.thecanary.co/trending/2021/03/28/protesters-across-england-and-wales-stand-in-solidarity-to-try-and-kill-the-bill/ But the new bill gives the police power to impose: such conditions as appear to the officer necessary to prevent the disorder, damage, disruption, impact or intimidation The bill will give the police power to impose conditions on protests based on the amount of noise they make. This allows police to intervene in protests where “noise causes a significant impact on those in the vicinity or serious disruption to the running of an organisation”. And the legislation also gives the home secretary the power, without parliamentary approval, to define “serious disruption” to communities. Police would then be able impose conditions using the definition. Further amendments will make it easier for protestors to be convicted for not complying with conditions placed on protests, saying a person will be “guilty of an offence” if: in the case of a public assembly in England and Wales, at the time the person fails to comply with the condition the person knows or ought to know that the condition has been imposed. Crucially in this section is the loose wording “ought to know”. Under current legislation, the police have to prove that a person was aware of the conditions in order to secure a conviction. Further powers The bill also expands sentencing powers for several offences. Damaging memorials will lead to a maximum ten year sentence, and the maximum penalty for assaulting an emergency worker, which includes police officers, will be doubled to two years. Meanwhile, a new statutory offence of public nuisance will be created for actions causing: serious harm to the public or a section of the public. And the definition of “serious harm” includes actions that cause: serious distress, serious annoyance, serious inconvenience or serious loss of amenity Anyone convicted of this offence faces up to ten years in jail. The police would also obtain further powers to remove “unauthorised encampments”, as well as criminalising trespass and expanding stop-and-search powers. One-person protests and protests near parliament that obstruct vehicle access could also be limited under the new laws.
Voir plus
2021-03-28 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 367 votes : 27-2 com : 3 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Allah v. Xi? China retaliates, US Canadian individuals banned over Muslim Uyghur 'reeducation camps | (Y) | | |
Is China’s atheist Communist Party trying to eradicate Islam? In a west China city, Muslim children have been banned from religious activity, while authorities have curtailed the number of people over 16 allowed to study and limited the certification processes for new imams https://www.scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/2155428/chinas-atheist-communist-party-trying-eradicate-islam Green-domed mosques still dominate the skyline of China’s “Little Mecca”, but they have undergone a profound change – no longer do boys flit through their stone courtyards en route to classes and prayers. In what locals said they fear is a deliberate move to eradicate Islam, the atheist ruling Communist Party has banned children under 16 from religious activity or study in Linxia, a deeply Islamic region in western China’s Gansu province that had offered a haven of comparative religious freedom for the ethnic Hui Muslims there. China governs Xinjiang, another majority Muslim region in its far west, with an iron fist to weed out what it calls “religious extremism” and “separatism” in the wake of deadly unrest, throwing ethnic Uygurs into shadowy re-education camps without due process for minor infractions such as owning a Koran or even growing a beard. Ethnic Hui Muslim men pray at Nanguan Mosque in Linxia, where children under 16 have been banned from engaging in religious activity or study. Photo: AFP Ethnic Hui Muslim men pray at Nanguan Mosque in Linxia, where children under 16 have been banned from engaging in religious activity or study. Photo: AFP Now, Hui Muslims fear similar surveillance and repression. “The winds have shifted” in the past year, said a senior imam who requested anonymity. “Frankly, I’m very afraid they’re going to implement the Xinjiang model here.” Local authorities have severely curtailed the number of people over 16 officially allowed to study in each mosque and limited certification processes for new imams. How China is trying to impose Islam with Chinese characteristics in the Hui Muslim heartland 14 May 2018 They have also instructed mosques to display national flags and stop sounding the call to prayer to reduce “noise pollution” – with loudspeakers removed entirely from all 355 mosques in a neighbouring county. EVERY SATURDAY SCMP Global Impact Newsletter By submitting, you consent to receiving marketing emails from SCMP. If you don't want these, tick here By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy “They want to secularise Muslims, to cut off Islam at the roots,” the imam said, shaking with barely restrained emotion. “These days, children are not allowed to believe in religion: only in communism and the party.” Authorities in Linxia have instructed mosques to display national flags and stop sounding the call to prayer to reduce noise pollution. Photo: AFP Authorities in Linxia have instructed mosques to display national flags and stop sounding the call to prayer to reduce noise pollution. Photo: AFP More than 1,000 boys used to attend his mid-sized mosque to study Koranic basics during summer and winter school holidays but now they are banned from even entering the premises. His classrooms are still full of huge Arabic books from Saudi Arabia, browned with age and bound in heavy leather. But only 20 officially registered pupils over the age of 16 are now allowed to use them. China orders crackdown on large outdoor religious statues to ‘prevent commercialisation’ 26 May 2018 Parents were told the ban on extracurricular Koranic study was for their children’s own good, so they could rest and focus on secular coursework. But most are utterly panicked. “We’re scared, very scared. If it goes on like this, after a generation or two, our traditions will be gone,” said Ma Lan, a 45-year-old caretaker, tears dripping quietly into her uneaten bowl of beef noodle soup. Inspectors checked her local mosque every few days during the last school holiday to ensure none of the 70 or so village boys were present.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Allah v. Xi? China retaliates, US Canadian individuals banned over Muslim Uyghur 'reeducation camps | (Y) | | |
Is China’s atheist Communist Party trying to eradicate Islam? In a west China city, Muslim children have been banned from religious activity, while authorities have curtailed the number of people over 16 allowed to study and limited the certification processes for new imams https://www.scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/2155428/chinas-atheist-communist-party-trying-eradicate-islam Green-domed mosques still dominate the skyline of China’s “Little Mecca”, but they have undergone a profound change – no longer do boys flit through their stone courtyards en route to classes and prayers. In what locals said they fear is a deliberate move to eradicate Islam, the atheist ruling Communist Party has banned children under 16 from religious activity or study in Linxia, a deeply Islamic region in western China’s Gansu province that had offered a haven of comparative religious freedom for the ethnic Hui Muslims there. China governs Xinjiang, another majority Muslim region in its far west, with an iron fist to weed out what it calls “religious extremism” and “separatism” in the wake of deadly unrest, throwing ethnic Uygurs into shadowy re-education camps without due process for minor infractions such as owning a Koran or even growing a beard. Ethnic Hui Muslim men pray at Nanguan Mosque in Linxia, where children under 16 have been banned from engaging in religious activity or study. Photo: AFP Ethnic Hui Muslim men pray at Nanguan Mosque in Linxia, where children under 16 have been banned from engaging in religious activity or study. Photo: AFP Now, Hui Muslims fear similar surveillance and repression. “The winds have shifted” in the past year, said a senior imam who requested anonymity. “Frankly, I’m very afraid they’re going to implement the Xinjiang model here.” Local authorities have severely curtailed the number of people over 16 officially allowed to study in each mosque and limited certification processes for new imams. How China is trying to impose Islam with Chinese characteristics in the Hui Muslim heartland 14 May 2018 They have also instructed mosques to display national flags and stop sounding the call to prayer to reduce “noise pollution” – with loudspeakers removed entirely from all 355 mosques in a neighbouring county. EVERY SATURDAY SCMP Global Impact Newsletter By submitting, you consent to receiving marketing emails from SCMP. If you don't want these, tick here By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy “They want to secularise Muslims, to cut off Islam at the roots,” the imam said, shaking with barely restrained emotion. “These days, children are not allowed to believe in religion: only in communism and the party.” Authorities in Linxia have instructed mosques to display national flags and stop sounding the call to prayer to reduce noise pollution. Photo: AFP Authorities in Linxia have instructed mosques to display national flags and stop sounding the call to prayer to reduce noise pollution. Photo: AFP More than 1,000 boys used to attend his mid-sized mosque to study Koranic basics during summer and winter school holidays but now they are banned from even entering the premises. His classrooms are still full of huge Arabic books from Saudi Arabia, browned with age and bound in heavy leather. But only 20 officially registered pupils over the age of 16 are now allowed to use them. China orders crackdown on large outdoor religious statues to ‘prevent commercialisation’ 26 May 2018 Parents were told the ban on extracurricular Koranic study was for their children’s own good, so they could rest and focus on secular coursework. But most are utterly panicked. “We’re scared, very scared. If it goes on like this, after a generation or two, our traditions will be gone,” said Ma Lan, a 45-year-old caretaker, tears dripping quietly into her uneaten bowl of beef noodle soup. Inspectors checked her local mosque every few days during the last school holiday to ensure none of the 70 or so village boys were present.
Voir plus
2021-03-25 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 800 votes : 40-2 com : 29 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Riot Police Storm Peaceful Bristol 'Right To Reside' Protest, Citing Covid Guidance 23Mar21 ITV Wes | (Y) | | |
Bristol police boss defends force’s response to a Kill The Bill protest on College Green https://www.itv.com/news/westcountry/2021-03-24/bristol-police-boss-defends-forces-response-to-a-kill-the-bill-protest-on-college-green Wednesday 24 March 2021, 5:32pm Avon and Somerset’s top police officer has defended the force’s response to a Kill The Bill protest on College Green. Protesters started gathering in the College Green area at around 4pm on Tuesday 23 March. It was the latest 'Kill the Bill' protest in the city against the Government’s Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. Throughout the afternoon and evening, police liaison officers asked people to disperse. When protesters still had not moved on at 10pm, a hundred riot police arrived. At a press briefing on Wednesday 24 March, Chief Constable Andy Marsh said the protest was more like a music festival than a demonstration and a minority of the 250-strong crowd wanted a confrontation with police. Footage shows forceful tactics from officers to disperse the crowd in the early hours of Wednesday 24 March, just two days after a huge protest in the city centre descended into violent clashes between rioters and police. Mr Marsh said: “We understand people’s frustrations, anxiety and concerns about the restrictions placed on their lives but now is not the time to protest. “All afternoon we had members of our neighbourhood policing team and our specially-trained protest liaison officers seeking to persuade those present that they needed to disperse. “They did know very clearly that we would have to take action. “It was our duty, based on the situation with the pandemic and infections, to prevent a risk.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Riot Police Storm Peaceful Bristol 'Right To Reside' Protest, Citing Covid Guidance 23Mar21 ITV Wes | (Y) | | |
Bristol police boss defends force’s response to a Kill The Bill protest on College Green https://www.itv.com/news/westcountry/2021-03-24/bristol-police-boss-defends-forces-response-to-a-kill-the-bill-protest-on-college-green Wednesday 24 March 2021, 5:32pm Avon and Somerset’s top police officer has defended the force’s response to a Kill The Bill protest on College Green. Protesters started gathering in the College Green area at around 4pm on Tuesday 23 March. It was the latest 'Kill the Bill' protest in the city against the Government’s Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. Throughout the afternoon and evening, police liaison officers asked people to disperse. When protesters still had not moved on at 10pm, a hundred riot police arrived. At a press briefing on Wednesday 24 March, Chief Constable Andy Marsh said the protest was more like a music festival than a demonstration and a minority of the 250-strong crowd wanted a confrontation with police. Footage shows forceful tactics from officers to disperse the crowd in the early hours of Wednesday 24 March, just two days after a huge protest in the city centre descended into violent clashes between rioters and police. Mr Marsh said: “We understand people’s frustrations, anxiety and concerns about the restrictions placed on their lives but now is not the time to protest. “All afternoon we had members of our neighbourhood policing team and our specially-trained protest liaison officers seeking to persuade those present that they needed to disperse. “They did know very clearly that we would have to take action. “It was our duty, based on the situation with the pandemic and infections, to prevent a risk.
Voir plus
2021-03-23 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 455 votes : 32-0 com : 4 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Release Huawei's Meng Wanzhou To Stop WWIII China Begins Trial Of Canadian 'Spy' On Espionage Charg | (Y) | | |
Meng Wanzhou lawyer attacks 'shoddy' notes of RCMP, CBSA officers as 'travesty' Defence team claims CBSA brass ordered subordinates to stop creating records in high-profile case Jason Proctor · CBC News · Posted: Mar 22, 2021 Meng Wanzhou's lead defence lawyer says "shoddy" note-taking by the police and customs officers involved in the Huawei executive's 2018 arrest amounts to a dereliction of duty. Veteran defender Richard Peck read directly from the CBSA's enforcement manual during B.C. Supreme Court extradition proceedings Monday as he accused the officers who detained and grilled Meng of trying to "obscure" the true nature of what happened. The manual deals specifically with the importance of officer notebooks, saying success in legal proceedings can depend on the "ability to recount the circumstances immediately before, during, and after an occurrence, incident or enforcement action." "Every person involved with Ms. Meng on December 1st at the Vancouver International Airport from both the RCMP and the CBSA were well aware of the significance of what they were dealing with," Peck said. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/meng-wanzhou-extradition-rcmp-cbsa-1.5959804 China comments on Huawei arrest in Canada China calls on US to release Meng Wanzhou and stop ‘unreasonable bashing’ of Huawei https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/china-huawei-meng-wanzhou-arrest-release-trade-war-trump-xi-jinping-a8751806.html The Chinese foreign ministry accused the US of ‘using national power to tarnish and crack down on specific Chinese companies in an attempt to strangle their lawful and legitimate operations’ China’s foreign ministry has called on the US to stop its “unreasonable bashing” of Chinese companies such as Huawei. On Monday the US charged telecoms giant Huawei with stealing trade secrets. The US department of justice is also seeking to extradite the firm’s chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou who was arrested in Canada in December. “As I told high-level Chinese law enforcement officials in August – we need more law enforcement cooperation with China,” acting attorney general Matt Whitaker said on Monday. “China should be concerned about criminal activities by Chinese companies – and China should take action.” In response, Geng Shuang, spokesperson for the Chinese foreign ministry, said the country was “highly concerned” by the charges against Huawei and Ms Meng. “The Chinese government has all along urged Chinese companies to conduct international economic cooperation on the basis of complying with relevant laws and regulations,” he said. “At the same time, China asks that all countries provide a fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for the normal operations of Chinese companies.” “For some time, the US has been using national power to tarnish and crack down on specific Chinese companies in an attempt to strangle their lawful and legitimate operations. Behind such practices are deep political intentions and manipulations. “We strongly urge the US to stop its unreasonable bashing on Chinese companies including Huawei, and treat them objectively and fairly. China will also continue to uphold the lawful and legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies.” Mr Geng said China had “made clear its stern position many times” with regard to the Meng Wanzhou case, and accused the US and Canada of abusing their bilateral extradition agreement by arresting the Huawei executive “for no reason”. “Such actions seriously violate the legitimate rights and interests of the Chinese citizen. Once again we urge the US to immediately withdraw its arrest warrant for Ms Meng Wanzhou, refrain from making a formal extradition request, and stop going further down the wrong path,” Mr Geng said.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Release Huawei's Meng Wanzhou To Stop WWIII China Begins Trial Of Canadian 'Spy' On Espionage Charg | (Y) | | |
Meng Wanzhou lawyer attacks 'shoddy' notes of RCMP, CBSA officers as 'travesty' Defence team claims CBSA brass ordered subordinates to stop creating records in high-profile case Jason Proctor · CBC News · Posted: Mar 22, 2021 Meng Wanzhou's lead defence lawyer says "shoddy" note-taking by the police and customs officers involved in the Huawei executive's 2018 arrest amounts to a dereliction of duty. Veteran defender Richard Peck read directly from the CBSA's enforcement manual during B.C. Supreme Court extradition proceedings Monday as he accused the officers who detained and grilled Meng of trying to "obscure" the true nature of what happened. The manual deals specifically with the importance of officer notebooks, saying success in legal proceedings can depend on the "ability to recount the circumstances immediately before, during, and after an occurrence, incident or enforcement action." "Every person involved with Ms. Meng on December 1st at the Vancouver International Airport from both the RCMP and the CBSA were well aware of the significance of what they were dealing with," Peck said. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/meng-wanzhou-extradition-rcmp-cbsa-1.5959804 China comments on Huawei arrest in Canada China calls on US to release Meng Wanzhou and stop ‘unreasonable bashing’ of Huawei https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/china-huawei-meng-wanzhou-arrest-release-trade-war-trump-xi-jinping-a8751806.html The Chinese foreign ministry accused the US of ‘using national power to tarnish and crack down on specific Chinese companies in an attempt to strangle their lawful and legitimate operations’ China’s foreign ministry has called on the US to stop its “unreasonable bashing” of Chinese companies such as Huawei. On Monday the US charged telecoms giant Huawei with stealing trade secrets. The US department of justice is also seeking to extradite the firm’s chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou who was arrested in Canada in December. “As I told high-level Chinese law enforcement officials in August – we need more law enforcement cooperation with China,” acting attorney general Matt Whitaker said on Monday. “China should be concerned about criminal activities by Chinese companies – and China should take action.” In response, Geng Shuang, spokesperson for the Chinese foreign ministry, said the country was “highly concerned” by the charges against Huawei and Ms Meng. “The Chinese government has all along urged Chinese companies to conduct international economic cooperation on the basis of complying with relevant laws and regulations,” he said. “At the same time, China asks that all countries provide a fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for the normal operations of Chinese companies.” “For some time, the US has been using national power to tarnish and crack down on specific Chinese companies in an attempt to strangle their lawful and legitimate operations. Behind such practices are deep political intentions and manipulations. “We strongly urge the US to stop its unreasonable bashing on Chinese companies including Huawei, and treat them objectively and fairly. China will also continue to uphold the lawful and legitimate rights and interests of Chinese companies.” Mr Geng said China had “made clear its stern position many times” with regard to the Meng Wanzhou case, and accused the US and Canada of abusing their bilateral extradition agreement by arresting the Huawei executive “for no reason”. “Such actions seriously violate the legitimate rights and interests of the Chinese citizen. Once again we urge the US to immediately withdraw its arrest warrant for Ms Meng Wanzhou, refrain from making a formal extradition request, and stop going further down the wrong path,” Mr Geng said.
Voir plus
2021-03-21 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 655 votes : 53-2 com : 15 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Kill The Bill Bristol Protest, Priti Patel's Police Crime Sentencing & Courts Bill ITV_West_21M | (Y) | | |
Bristol protest: Demonstrators clash with police Published 25 minutes ago https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-56477887 Protesters have clashed with police after thousands of people turned up to a demonstration officers had "strongly advised" against attending. Angry scenes unfolded in Bristol where crowds had gathered for the Kill the Bill demonstration in opposition to the Police and Crime Bill. Demonstrators scaled the police station, threw fireworks into the crowd and daubed graffiti on the walls. Police said perpetrators would be "identified and brought to justice". Videos on Twitter showed protesters rocking a police van while officers on horseback were pushed by the crowd. It is not clear if any arrests have been made and a spokesman for Avon and Somerset Police described it as a "rapidly-developing situation". Police vans that lined up to try and break up the demonstration were smashed up and had their tyres let down, as the crowd chanted "shame on you". "Officers are continuing to deal with a smaller number of protesters in Bridewell Street," a police spokesman said. "They've had projectiles thrown at them, including a firework, and have been verbally abused. "This is unacceptable behaviour and those responsible for offences will be identified and brought to justice." Campaigners have staged a string of protests against the bill, which would give the police more powers to deal with non-violent demonstrations. Many attendees in Bristol wore face masks and carried placards with slogans such as: "Say no to UK police state", "Freedom to protest is fundamental to democracy", and "Kill the Bill". Avon and Somerset Police had encouraged people to stay away from the demo and attend virtual protests instead. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. View original tweet on Twitter Mass gatherings are currently banned under coronavirus legislation and anyone breaching regulations could be fined, though some MPs have said the law should change to allow protests. This weekend has seen a number of protests and demonstrations, with campaigners gathering in support of various causes.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Kill The Bill Bristol Protest, Priti Patel's Police Crime Sentencing & Courts Bill ITV_West_21M | (Y) | | |
Bristol protest: Demonstrators clash with police Published 25 minutes ago https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-56477887 Protesters have clashed with police after thousands of people turned up to a demonstration officers had "strongly advised" against attending. Angry scenes unfolded in Bristol where crowds had gathered for the Kill the Bill demonstration in opposition to the Police and Crime Bill. Demonstrators scaled the police station, threw fireworks into the crowd and daubed graffiti on the walls. Police said perpetrators would be "identified and brought to justice". Videos on Twitter showed protesters rocking a police van while officers on horseback were pushed by the crowd. It is not clear if any arrests have been made and a spokesman for Avon and Somerset Police described it as a "rapidly-developing situation". Police vans that lined up to try and break up the demonstration were smashed up and had their tyres let down, as the crowd chanted "shame on you". "Officers are continuing to deal with a smaller number of protesters in Bridewell Street," a police spokesman said. "They've had projectiles thrown at them, including a firework, and have been verbally abused. "This is unacceptable behaviour and those responsible for offences will be identified and brought to justice." Campaigners have staged a string of protests against the bill, which would give the police more powers to deal with non-violent demonstrations. Many attendees in Bristol wore face masks and carried placards with slogans such as: "Say no to UK police state", "Freedom to protest is fundamental to democracy", and "Kill the Bill". Avon and Somerset Police had encouraged people to stay away from the demo and attend virtual protests instead. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. View original tweet on Twitter Mass gatherings are currently banned under coronavirus legislation and anyone breaching regulations could be fined, though some MPs have said the law should change to allow protests. This weekend has seen a number of protests and demonstrations, with campaigners gathering in support of various causes.
Voir plus
2021-03-20 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 949 votes : 58-2 com : 9 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Priti Patel Police State: UK Police Forces Are Now Perfect Hiding Place For Criminals, Tony Gosling | (Y) | | |
The Dangerous Authoritarian Threat Posed by Priti Patel to Our Right to Protest and Dissent - 14Mar21 http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2021/03/14/the-dangerous-authoritarian-threat-posed-by-priti-patel-to-our-right-to-protest-and-dissent/ https://michaeleastwriter.com/2021/03/14/the-problem-with-police-criminality-in-the-uk-is-much-bigger-than-you-think/ So the war is on, then — of home secretary Priti Patel versus the people; Priti Patel, the authoritarian bigot, versus anyone who dares to disagree with her about anything; Priti Patel, a woman, and the child of Ugandan-Indian immigrants, who, nevertheless, embodies the worst aspects of an arrogant, intolerant, racist, sexist, planet-despoiling, rights-hating elite British patriarchy. For anyone concerned about civil liberties in the UK, Priti Patel’s deeply troubling attitude to dissent seems to have fuelled yesterday’s heavy-handed response by the police to a peaceful vigil by women on Clapham Common mourning the brutal murder of Sarah Everard, allegedly by a serving police officer. The sight of policemen using force to break up the vigil was an act of truly astonishing insensitivity, and while there are clearly questions to be asked of the officers involved — concerning their blatant ‘manhandling’ of grieving women, and claims that some officers deliberately trampled on flowers left by woman at the vigil, as well as the risibility of the Metropolitan Police’s own claims about them having to break up the vigil because of concerns about public safety in light of the ongoing Covid regulations — it seems most pertinent to look up the chain of command for an explanation of how and why such a heavy-handed and insensitive display of force took place — and that chain of command leads inexorably, via the Met Commissioner Cressida Dick, to Priti Patel. As Lindsey Graham, the convenor of the Stop the War Coalition, tweeted last night, “I have negotiated with the Metropolitan Police for 20 years over Stop the War demos. They are very sensitive to what is and isn’t popular. They know the feeling over Sarah Everard is huge. So why the Clapham Common attack? Ordered from highest places. Looking at you Priti Patel.” Priti Patel, the most shockingly authoritarian home secretary in living memory — in a role that notoriously radicalises those who take the job — has, to be blunt, now added women to a roll-call of what she perceives to be a threat to her notions of law and order — a roll-call that, to anyone paying attention to her shocking authoritarian pronouncements over the last few years, also includes the environmental campaigners of Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter protestors, Gypsies and travellers, and, lest we forget,”lefty lawyers”, or “activist lawyers.” Moreover, the timing of yesterday’s assault is far from coincidental, as tomorrow the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill 2021 has its second reading in the House of Commons. This horrendous bill includes “a desire to curtail the kinds of protests we saw last summer with Black Lives Matter, on the one hand, and Extinction Rebellion, on the other”, and “new regulations about unauthorised encampments … aimed at the Traveller community”, as Kenan Malik explains in an Observer article today, adding that Priti Patel ”has long expressed her distaste for the Black Lives Matter protests”, and also noting that “[t]he official policy paper on the new bill begins with quotes from Cressida Dick [about] how the Extinction Rebellion actions demonstrated the need for new laws ‘to deal with protests where people are not primarily violent or seriously disorderly’ but do cause disruption.” ......................... Non-violent direct action, by its very nature, repudiates violence as a means of achieving a movement’s aims, but actively embraces disruption as a legitimate means to that end, and history teaches us that everything we value in liberal democracies has only come about through struggle — the end of serfdom, the end of slavery, the legal obstruction of executive tyranny, universal suffrage, universal education and healthcare, workers’ rights, environmental safeguards, unemployment benefits, pensions and crucial battles against sexual discrimination and racism. For Patel, the authoritarianism of the government’s Covid restrictions, and the lack of meaningful debate and opposition — provided by the temporary extinction of Parliament as a meaningful part of the democratic process, and by the general uselessness of Keir Starmer — has given her the illusion that her malignant dream of a UK in which all meaningful dissent is stopped, by police violence, if necessary, is close to coming true, and it is incumbent on all of us who value the right to robustly challenge what is wrong through protest — and, when required, active disruption of the status quo — to resist. See you on the streets!
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Priti Patel Police State: UK Police Forces Are Now Perfect Hiding Place For Criminals, Tony Gosling | (Y) | | |
The Dangerous Authoritarian Threat Posed by Priti Patel to Our Right to Protest and Dissent - 14Mar21 http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2021/03/14/the-dangerous-authoritarian-threat-posed-by-priti-patel-to-our-right-to-protest-and-dissent/ https://michaeleastwriter.com/2021/03/14/the-problem-with-police-criminality-in-the-uk-is-much-bigger-than-you-think/ So the war is on, then — of home secretary Priti Patel versus the people; Priti Patel, the authoritarian bigot, versus anyone who dares to disagree with her about anything; Priti Patel, a woman, and the child of Ugandan-Indian immigrants, who, nevertheless, embodies the worst aspects of an arrogant, intolerant, racist, sexist, planet-despoiling, rights-hating elite British patriarchy. For anyone concerned about civil liberties in the UK, Priti Patel’s deeply troubling attitude to dissent seems to have fuelled yesterday’s heavy-handed response by the police to a peaceful vigil by women on Clapham Common mourning the brutal murder of Sarah Everard, allegedly by a serving police officer. The sight of policemen using force to break up the vigil was an act of truly astonishing insensitivity, and while there are clearly questions to be asked of the officers involved — concerning their blatant ‘manhandling’ of grieving women, and claims that some officers deliberately trampled on flowers left by woman at the vigil, as well as the risibility of the Metropolitan Police’s own claims about them having to break up the vigil because of concerns about public safety in light of the ongoing Covid regulations — it seems most pertinent to look up the chain of command for an explanation of how and why such a heavy-handed and insensitive display of force took place — and that chain of command leads inexorably, via the Met Commissioner Cressida Dick, to Priti Patel. As Lindsey Graham, the convenor of the Stop the War Coalition, tweeted last night, “I have negotiated with the Metropolitan Police for 20 years over Stop the War demos. They are very sensitive to what is and isn’t popular. They know the feeling over Sarah Everard is huge. So why the Clapham Common attack? Ordered from highest places. Looking at you Priti Patel.” Priti Patel, the most shockingly authoritarian home secretary in living memory — in a role that notoriously radicalises those who take the job — has, to be blunt, now added women to a roll-call of what she perceives to be a threat to her notions of law and order — a roll-call that, to anyone paying attention to her shocking authoritarian pronouncements over the last few years, also includes the environmental campaigners of Extinction Rebellion, Black Lives Matter protestors, Gypsies and travellers, and, lest we forget,”lefty lawyers”, or “activist lawyers.” Moreover, the timing of yesterday’s assault is far from coincidental, as tomorrow the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill 2021 has its second reading in the House of Commons. This horrendous bill includes “a desire to curtail the kinds of protests we saw last summer with Black Lives Matter, on the one hand, and Extinction Rebellion, on the other”, and “new regulations about unauthorised encampments … aimed at the Traveller community”, as Kenan Malik explains in an Observer article today, adding that Priti Patel ”has long expressed her distaste for the Black Lives Matter protests”, and also noting that “[t]he official policy paper on the new bill begins with quotes from Cressida Dick [about] how the Extinction Rebellion actions demonstrated the need for new laws ‘to deal with protests where people are not primarily violent or seriously disorderly’ but do cause disruption.” ......................... Non-violent direct action, by its very nature, repudiates violence as a means of achieving a movement’s aims, but actively embraces disruption as a legitimate means to that end, and history teaches us that everything we value in liberal democracies has only come about through struggle — the end of serfdom, the end of slavery, the legal obstruction of executive tyranny, universal suffrage, universal education and healthcare, workers’ rights, environmental safeguards, unemployment benefits, pensions and crucial battles against sexual discrimination and racism. For Patel, the authoritarianism of the government’s Covid restrictions, and the lack of meaningful debate and opposition — provided by the temporary extinction of Parliament as a meaningful part of the democratic process, and by the general uselessness of Keir Starmer — has given her the illusion that her malignant dream of a UK in which all meaningful dissent is stopped, by police violence, if necessary, is close to coming true, and it is incumbent on all of us who value the right to robustly challenge what is wrong through protest — and, when required, active disruption of the status quo — to resist. See you on the streets!
Voir plus
2021-03-18 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 949 votes : 71-1 com : 16 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Hidden History: The Secret Origins Of The First World War by Gerry Docherty & Jim Macgregor (20 | (Y) | | |
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War by Gerry Docherty, James MacGregor https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17307153-hidden-history Hidden History uniquely exposes those responsible for the First World War. It reveals how accounts of the war’s origins have been deliberately falsified to conceal the guilt of the secret cabal of very rich and powerful men in London responsible for the most heinous crime perpetrated on humanity. For ten years, they plotted the destruction of Germany as the first stage of their plan to take control of the world. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was no chance happening. It lit a fuse that had been carefully set through a chain of command stretching from Sarajevo through Belgrade and St Petersburg to that cabal in London. Our understanding of these events has been firmly trapped in a web of falsehood and duplicity carefully constructed by the victors at Versailles in 1919 and maintained by compliant historians ever since. The official version is fatally flawed, warped by the volume of evidence they destroyed or concealed from public view. Hidden History poses a tantalising challenge. The authors ask only that you examine the evidence they lay before you
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Hidden History: The Secret Origins Of The First World War by Gerry Docherty & Jim Macgregor (20 | (Y) | | |
Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War by Gerry Docherty, James MacGregor https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17307153-hidden-history Hidden History uniquely exposes those responsible for the First World War. It reveals how accounts of the war’s origins have been deliberately falsified to conceal the guilt of the secret cabal of very rich and powerful men in London responsible for the most heinous crime perpetrated on humanity. For ten years, they plotted the destruction of Germany as the first stage of their plan to take control of the world. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was no chance happening. It lit a fuse that had been carefully set through a chain of command stretching from Sarajevo through Belgrade and St Petersburg to that cabal in London. Our understanding of these events has been firmly trapped in a web of falsehood and duplicity carefully constructed by the victors at Versailles in 1919 and maintained by compliant historians ever since. The official version is fatally flawed, warped by the volume of evidence they destroyed or concealed from public view. Hidden History poses a tantalising challenge. The authors ask only that you examine the evidence they lay before you
Voir plus
2021-03-16 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 572 votes : 54-3 com : 8 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Police State UK Criminalising Protest & Homeless: Priti Patels Police Crime Sentencing & Co | (Y) | | |
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/police-bill-anti-protest-law-23725500 What are the most controversial parts of the Bill? Police can impose more conditions on protests Clause 55 will let police impose start and finish times and maximum noise levels on a wider range of protests in England and Wales. ‘Serious annoyance’ will carry up to 10 years’ jail Clause 59 will axe the ‘common law’ definition of public nuisance and replace it with a clear set of words agreed by Parliament. It will make it a crime to “intentionally or recklessly” cause public nuisance without a reasonable excuse. Offenders will get up to a year’s jail from magistrates or 10 years from a crown court judge if found guilty, in the worst cases. The government insists this is simply taking the current definition of public nuisance and putting it on a proper footing. “This will provide clarity to the police and potential offenders, giving clear notice of what conduct is forbidden,” the Home Office said. But there is not a clear list of “reasonable excuses” - the government just say defendants will have to prove that excuse existed in court, on the balance of probabilities. And two words in this clause have attracted a lot of interest. Someone will fall foul of the law if they have caused a person “serious distress, serious annoyance, serious inconvenience or serious loss of amenity.” How will “serious annoyance” be interpreted by police? Most loudhailers will be banned outside Parliament Clause 57 will hugely expand the “controlled area” outside Parliament, where tents and unauthorised loudspeakers or megaphones are banned. Those who disobey can be fined up to £5,000. A similar move was recommended by Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights, which warned access to parliament must not be obstructed after a wave of threats against MPs. One-person protests face a crackdown Clause 60 has already been dubbed the ‘Steve Bray’ law, after the man who spent years shouting ‘Stop Brexit!’ at Parliament. Defacing a statue will carry up to 10 years’ jail Clause 46 will raise the maximum penalty for criminal damage to a memorial or statue from three months to 10 years. People in protest camps can be jailed for three months Clause 60 will create a new offence of “residing on land without consent in or with a vehicle”. This could affect protest camps like Extinction Rebellion, as the law will apply even if their “residing” is only temporary, and will apply equally to common land and private land. Protesters can be ordered to leave by police if they are deemed to be causing “significant disruption”, or even if they haven’t caused disruption yet but it is deemed “likely” in future. If they refuse, they can be fined up to £2,500 or jailed for up to three months. Police will also be given more powers to remove unauthorised encampments on roads. A petition signed by more than 130,000 people warned criminalising trespass would be “an extreme, illiberal and unnecessary attack on ancient freedoms”, adding: “For a thousand years, trespass has been a civil offence.” Critics say the law threatens not only protests, but also wild camping, ramblers, new rights of way and Traveller communities. What else is in the Bill? The plans include new laws to reform sentencing, the courts and the management of offenders, as well as more powers and protections for the police, some of which will be UK-wide while others may only apply in England and Wales. All these could in theory still be approved by MPs later, while removing the bits on protest, if the Bill passes second reading. Shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy said: ”In the 20 schedules, 176 clauses and 296 pages of the Conservatives' Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, "women" are not mentioned even once.”
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Police State UK Criminalising Protest & Homeless: Priti Patels Police Crime Sentencing & Co | (Y) | | |
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/police-bill-anti-protest-law-23725500 What are the most controversial parts of the Bill? Police can impose more conditions on protests Clause 55 will let police impose start and finish times and maximum noise levels on a wider range of protests in England and Wales. ‘Serious annoyance’ will carry up to 10 years’ jail Clause 59 will axe the ‘common law’ definition of public nuisance and replace it with a clear set of words agreed by Parliament. It will make it a crime to “intentionally or recklessly” cause public nuisance without a reasonable excuse. Offenders will get up to a year’s jail from magistrates or 10 years from a crown court judge if found guilty, in the worst cases. The government insists this is simply taking the current definition of public nuisance and putting it on a proper footing. “This will provide clarity to the police and potential offenders, giving clear notice of what conduct is forbidden,” the Home Office said. But there is not a clear list of “reasonable excuses” - the government just say defendants will have to prove that excuse existed in court, on the balance of probabilities. And two words in this clause have attracted a lot of interest. Someone will fall foul of the law if they have caused a person “serious distress, serious annoyance, serious inconvenience or serious loss of amenity.” How will “serious annoyance” be interpreted by police? Most loudhailers will be banned outside Parliament Clause 57 will hugely expand the “controlled area” outside Parliament, where tents and unauthorised loudspeakers or megaphones are banned. Those who disobey can be fined up to £5,000. A similar move was recommended by Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights, which warned access to parliament must not be obstructed after a wave of threats against MPs. One-person protests face a crackdown Clause 60 has already been dubbed the ‘Steve Bray’ law, after the man who spent years shouting ‘Stop Brexit!’ at Parliament. Defacing a statue will carry up to 10 years’ jail Clause 46 will raise the maximum penalty for criminal damage to a memorial or statue from three months to 10 years. People in protest camps can be jailed for three months Clause 60 will create a new offence of “residing on land without consent in or with a vehicle”. This could affect protest camps like Extinction Rebellion, as the law will apply even if their “residing” is only temporary, and will apply equally to common land and private land. Protesters can be ordered to leave by police if they are deemed to be causing “significant disruption”, or even if they haven’t caused disruption yet but it is deemed “likely” in future. If they refuse, they can be fined up to £2,500 or jailed for up to three months. Police will also be given more powers to remove unauthorised encampments on roads. A petition signed by more than 130,000 people warned criminalising trespass would be “an extreme, illiberal and unnecessary attack on ancient freedoms”, adding: “For a thousand years, trespass has been a civil offence.” Critics say the law threatens not only protests, but also wild camping, ramblers, new rights of way and Traveller communities. What else is in the Bill? The plans include new laws to reform sentencing, the courts and the management of offenders, as well as more powers and protections for the police, some of which will be UK-wide while others may only apply in England and Wales. All these could in theory still be approved by MPs later, while removing the bits on protest, if the Bill passes second reading. Shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy said: ”In the 20 schedules, 176 clauses and 296 pages of the Conservatives' Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill, "women" are not mentioned even once.”
Voir plus
2021-03-11 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 537 votes : 37-0 com : 4 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Gloucester Road Pigeon Shit Collective Squat Evicted BBC Radio Bristol | (Y) | | |
Gloucester Road Pigeon Sh1t Collective Squat Evicted BBC Radio Bristol Mar 2021
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Gloucester Road Pigeon Shit Collective Squat Evicted BBC Radio Bristol | (Y) | | |
Gloucester Road Pigeon Sh1t Collective Squat Evicted BBC Radio Bristol Mar 2021
Voir plus
2021-03-11 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 290 votes : 15-0 com : 7 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Chippenham's Rural Carve-Up? 'Cause Wiltshire', New Housing Distributor Road For Speculators | (Y) | | |
The Cause Wiltshire is a campaign set up by concerned residents of North Wiltshire, to stop the urban sprawl and destruction of our market town and beautiful countryside. https://www.facebook.com/CAUSEWILTSHIRE
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Chippenham's Rural Carve-Up? 'Cause Wiltshire', New Housing Distributor Road For Speculators | (Y) | | |
The Cause Wiltshire is a campaign set up by concerned residents of North Wiltshire, to stop the urban sprawl and destruction of our market town and beautiful countryside. https://www.facebook.com/CAUSEWILTSHIRE
Voir plus
2021-03-11 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 710 votes : 19-0 com : 2 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
ITV Westcountry Tonight Max Walsh Pigeon S**t Collective Eviction Gloucester Road | (Y) | | |
ITV Westcountry Tonight Max Walsh Pigeonshit Collective Eviction Gloucester Road
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
ITV Westcountry Tonight Max Walsh Pigeon S**t Collective Eviction Gloucester Road | (Y) | | |
ITV Westcountry Tonight Max Walsh Pigeonshit Collective Eviction Gloucester Road
Voir plus
2021-03-07 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 721 votes : 66-0 com : 4 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
The Vicky Letters: Blunt/Fleming Grab Victorias Albert Pike World War Plans From Germany's Balmoral | (Y) | | |
The Viccy Letters: Did Blunt And Fleming Snatch British/German Empresses WWI/WWII Conspiracy Correspondence In May 1945? - NOT The BCfm Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling By Albert Pike https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2021/03/03/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-29/ Churchill 'their finest hour' speech on 'Perverted Science' and 'Christian Civilisation'. The 'Viccy Letters' grab mission in May 1945 by Anthony Blunt and Owen Morshead at Schloss Friedrichshof near Frankfurt which is where the German Empress lived at the end of the nineteenth century and where Princess Sophie, sister of the present Duke of Edinburgh was living at the time with her pet wild boar, Bambi. The letters were dated from 1858 to 1901 and sent between Queen Victoria and her daughter Viktoria, the pair of Saxe-Coburg Gotha family Empress Victorias who by the late 1900s were ruling the two empires of Britain and Germany. Schloss Fredrichshof was built in 1893 by Victoria, the Princess Royal, daughter of Queen Victoria, wife of Kaiser Friedrich III and mother of Germany’s last emperor, Wilhelm II. She had modeled it on her family’s Balmoral Castle in Scotland and decorated the 100-room wooden-beamed edifice with reminders of home such as Tudor roses emblazoned on the castle’s portico. Troops of General George S. Patton’s Third Army captured Schloss Friedrichshof in April 1945 and found Countess Margaret of Hesse-Kassel, Victoria’s younger daughter, living in a 12-bedroom villa on the property while Margaret’s widowed daughter-in-law Princess Sophie (sister of Prince Philip, the future husband of Queen Elizabeth II) living in the castle itself. All were told they had four hours to vacate the property and were allowed to take only food and clothing with them. The following month, the castle became an officer’s recreation center and club under the management of Captain Kathleen B. Nash, Women’s Army Corps, who stole millions of dollars of jewels which were hidden in the basement. Tony’s educated guesswork on why those royal letters had to be kept so secret and whisked away to the Royal Archives at Windsor Castle: the orchestration by this Royal Saxe Coburg Gotha family of Scottish RIte Freemasonry Grand Master and Klu Klux Clan founder Albert Pike's plan for Two World Wars, to wrest the holy land from the Muslim Ottoman empire (WWI) and then create a Zionist state in the middle of it there (WWII) to seed religious tension and ultimately a Third World War between Islam and Zionism. An audacious long term plan to abolish faith in the God of the Bible and take over the world via geopolitical wars, introducing slavery based on a pantheistic, 'Luciferian' pseudo-faith instead. Author of 'The Antichrist And A Cup Of Tea' about evidence Prince Charles may be the Antichrist, Tim Cohen, explains in Biblical terms, what it will take for the ruling racist Jews controlling present-day Israel to turn back to God. Information is well research and documented. Author makes a very convincing case that Prince Charles of Wales is the coming Anti-Christ predicted in the Book of Revelation and Daniel. He also shows how the number of his name adds up to 666 in Hebrew & English using the method of St. Johns the time. Based on other knowledge I have acquired plus in this book, have me convinced it is true. "THE ANTICHRIST AND A CUP OF TEA presents the fascinating saga of the British Monarchy's centuries-long endeavor to establish a "New World Order," and for the first time, gives hard evidence to suggest the identity of the Anti-Christ." Prince Charles of Wales is the Head of Freemasonary world wide and the British Monarchy control all the privately owned Central Banks of all over the globe. Wales was at the edge of the old Roman empire. He is the Prince that will come from those who destroyed the Temple. He is a direct descendent of Roman Emperors and claims to be directly descendent from King David himself, a necessary requirement to be the Jewish Messiah.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
The Vicky Letters: Blunt/Fleming Grab Victorias Albert Pike World War Plans From Germany's Balmoral | (Y) | | |
The Viccy Letters: Did Blunt And Fleming Snatch British/German Empresses WWI/WWII Conspiracy Correspondence In May 1945? - NOT The BCfm Politics Show presented by Tony Gosling By Albert Pike https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2021/03/03/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-29/ Churchill 'their finest hour' speech on 'Perverted Science' and 'Christian Civilisation'. The 'Viccy Letters' grab mission in May 1945 by Anthony Blunt and Owen Morshead at Schloss Friedrichshof near Frankfurt which is where the German Empress lived at the end of the nineteenth century and where Princess Sophie, sister of the present Duke of Edinburgh was living at the time with her pet wild boar, Bambi. The letters were dated from 1858 to 1901 and sent between Queen Victoria and her daughter Viktoria, the pair of Saxe-Coburg Gotha family Empress Victorias who by the late 1900s were ruling the two empires of Britain and Germany. Schloss Fredrichshof was built in 1893 by Victoria, the Princess Royal, daughter of Queen Victoria, wife of Kaiser Friedrich III and mother of Germany’s last emperor, Wilhelm II. She had modeled it on her family’s Balmoral Castle in Scotland and decorated the 100-room wooden-beamed edifice with reminders of home such as Tudor roses emblazoned on the castle’s portico. Troops of General George S. Patton’s Third Army captured Schloss Friedrichshof in April 1945 and found Countess Margaret of Hesse-Kassel, Victoria’s younger daughter, living in a 12-bedroom villa on the property while Margaret’s widowed daughter-in-law Princess Sophie (sister of Prince Philip, the future husband of Queen Elizabeth II) living in the castle itself. All were told they had four hours to vacate the property and were allowed to take only food and clothing with them. The following month, the castle became an officer’s recreation center and club under the management of Captain Kathleen B. Nash, Women’s Army Corps, who stole millions of dollars of jewels which were hidden in the basement. Tony’s educated guesswork on why those royal letters had to be kept so secret and whisked away to the Royal Archives at Windsor Castle: the orchestration by this Royal Saxe Coburg Gotha family of Scottish RIte Freemasonry Grand Master and Klu Klux Clan founder Albert Pike's plan for Two World Wars, to wrest the holy land from the Muslim Ottoman empire (WWI) and then create a Zionist state in the middle of it there (WWII) to seed religious tension and ultimately a Third World War between Islam and Zionism. An audacious long term plan to abolish faith in the God of the Bible and take over the world via geopolitical wars, introducing slavery based on a pantheistic, 'Luciferian' pseudo-faith instead. Author of 'The Antichrist And A Cup Of Tea' about evidence Prince Charles may be the Antichrist, Tim Cohen, explains in Biblical terms, what it will take for the ruling racist Jews controlling present-day Israel to turn back to God. Information is well research and documented. Author makes a very convincing case that Prince Charles of Wales is the coming Anti-Christ predicted in the Book of Revelation and Daniel. He also shows how the number of his name adds up to 666 in Hebrew & English using the method of St. Johns the time. Based on other knowledge I have acquired plus in this book, have me convinced it is true. "THE ANTICHRIST AND A CUP OF TEA presents the fascinating saga of the British Monarchy's centuries-long endeavor to establish a "New World Order," and for the first time, gives hard evidence to suggest the identity of the Anti-Christ." Prince Charles of Wales is the Head of Freemasonary world wide and the British Monarchy control all the privately owned Central Banks of all over the globe. Wales was at the edge of the old Roman empire. He is the Prince that will come from those who destroyed the Temple. He is a direct descendent of Roman Emperors and claims to be directly descendent from King David himself, a necessary requirement to be the Jewish Messiah.
Voir plus
2021-03-04 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 368 votes : 32-1 com : 6 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
UK PM Boris defends £ billions of arms sales to Saudis despite 100,000 deaths and counting in Yemen | (Y) | | |
UK urged to end arms sales to Saudi Arabia following Khashoggi report Dan Sabbagh https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/uk-urged-to-end-arms-sales-to-saudi-arabia-following-khashoggi-report/ar-BB1e3lHW Britain faced fresh calls to end unrestricted arms sales to Saudi Arabia after the US published a CIA assessment which concluded that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had ordered the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Charities, civil rights groups and others said the disclosure threw the UK’s traditionally close relationship with Riyadh into stark relief in the aftermath of the release of the short but unambiguous report. Aid agency Oxfam argued that the UK should respond to the increasingly assertive approach taken by the Biden administration, which has already said it would halt arms sales to Riyadh that could be used in the long-running war in Yemen. Muhsin Siddiquey, Oxfam’s country cirector in Yemen, said: “At a time that the US seems to be evaluating its relationship with Saudi Arabia we would urge the UK government to do the same and stop its arms sales to Saudi Arabia which are fuelling the conflict in Yemen. “Over 12,000 civilian lives have been lost since the start of the war with atrocities on all sides. We need an immediate ceasefire to ensure no more innocent Yemenis are killed and that humanitarian agencies have safe access to deliver the support they need.” Tobias Ellwood, the Conservative chair of the UK defence select committee, reiterated a call he had made for the UK to follow the US in halting Yemen-related arms sales. “The CIA report is unambiguous in its conclusions and this will be inevitably be an embarrassment and shame to the wider country.” The MP called on Saudi Arabia’s ruling royal family to respond swiftly “in response to the loss in international confidence and trust of the crown prince” and the “wider cultural atmosphere that allowed such decision making to go unchallenged”. Last July, Britain subject 20 individuals suspected of involvement in the murder of Khashoggi to economic sanctions, although as with the US on Friday, the UK has refrained from targeting the crown prince personally. Mohammad Bin Salman Al Saud wearing a hat: Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has long been accused of involvement in the killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi.© Photograph: Bandar Aljaloud/AP Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has long been accused of involvement in the killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi. But the UK otherwise maintained a close diplomatic and military relationship with Riyadh, and is the second largest arms exporter to the country after the US. When sales of weapons that could be used in the conflict of Yemen were restarted by the UK last summer, after a court imposed review, it emerged that £1.4bn of bombs, missiles and other arms had been exported to the Gulf kingdom. Anna Stavrianakis, a professor in international relations at the University of Sussex, said that the UK’s open arms policy had “helped maintain the legitimacy of the regime” but that was coming under growing pressure after the change of administration in Washington. “The publication of such a clear cut CIA assessment puts the UK in an increasingly tricky position on arms sales. Until now it has been able to privilege its relationship with the Saudi leadership over domestic critics and other EU states because of the orientation of the former Trump administration.” The Open Society Justice Initiative, a US group thatsought the disclosure of the assessment via a lawsuit lodged in New York, said that the UK and key allies should join the US in imposing sanctions on bin Salman and “suspend all arms sales to Saudi Arabia.”
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
UK PM Boris defends £ billions of arms sales to Saudis despite 100,000 deaths and counting in Yemen | (Y) | | |
UK urged to end arms sales to Saudi Arabia following Khashoggi report Dan Sabbagh https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/world/uk-urged-to-end-arms-sales-to-saudi-arabia-following-khashoggi-report/ar-BB1e3lHW Britain faced fresh calls to end unrestricted arms sales to Saudi Arabia after the US published a CIA assessment which concluded that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had ordered the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. Charities, civil rights groups and others said the disclosure threw the UK’s traditionally close relationship with Riyadh into stark relief in the aftermath of the release of the short but unambiguous report. Aid agency Oxfam argued that the UK should respond to the increasingly assertive approach taken by the Biden administration, which has already said it would halt arms sales to Riyadh that could be used in the long-running war in Yemen. Muhsin Siddiquey, Oxfam’s country cirector in Yemen, said: “At a time that the US seems to be evaluating its relationship with Saudi Arabia we would urge the UK government to do the same and stop its arms sales to Saudi Arabia which are fuelling the conflict in Yemen. “Over 12,000 civilian lives have been lost since the start of the war with atrocities on all sides. We need an immediate ceasefire to ensure no more innocent Yemenis are killed and that humanitarian agencies have safe access to deliver the support they need.” Tobias Ellwood, the Conservative chair of the UK defence select committee, reiterated a call he had made for the UK to follow the US in halting Yemen-related arms sales. “The CIA report is unambiguous in its conclusions and this will be inevitably be an embarrassment and shame to the wider country.” The MP called on Saudi Arabia’s ruling royal family to respond swiftly “in response to the loss in international confidence and trust of the crown prince” and the “wider cultural atmosphere that allowed such decision making to go unchallenged”. Last July, Britain subject 20 individuals suspected of involvement in the murder of Khashoggi to economic sanctions, although as with the US on Friday, the UK has refrained from targeting the crown prince personally. Mohammad Bin Salman Al Saud wearing a hat: Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has long been accused of involvement in the killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi.© Photograph: Bandar Aljaloud/AP Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has long been accused of involvement in the killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi. But the UK otherwise maintained a close diplomatic and military relationship with Riyadh, and is the second largest arms exporter to the country after the US. When sales of weapons that could be used in the conflict of Yemen were restarted by the UK last summer, after a court imposed review, it emerged that £1.4bn of bombs, missiles and other arms had been exported to the Gulf kingdom. Anna Stavrianakis, a professor in international relations at the University of Sussex, said that the UK’s open arms policy had “helped maintain the legitimacy of the regime” but that was coming under growing pressure after the change of administration in Washington. “The publication of such a clear cut CIA assessment puts the UK in an increasingly tricky position on arms sales. Until now it has been able to privilege its relationship with the Saudi leadership over domestic critics and other EU states because of the orientation of the former Trump administration.” The Open Society Justice Initiative, a US group thatsought the disclosure of the assessment via a lawsuit lodged in New York, said that the UK and key allies should join the US in imposing sanctions on bin Salman and “suspend all arms sales to Saudi Arabia.”
Voir plus
2021-03-02 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 540 votes : 46-0 com : 10 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Shamima Begum NATO Child Trafficking For ISIS Talk Radio | (Y) | | |
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Shamima Begum NATO Child Trafficking For ISIS Talk Radio | (Y) | | |
Voir plus
2021-03-02 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 770 votes : 83-1 com : 9 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
US Elites Are Secretly Cooperating With China - Skull & Bones, Then and Now, Prof. Antony Sutto | (Y) | | |
China is using US satellite technologies to bolster its surveillance capabilities https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2021/02/25/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-28/ https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/23/china-is-reportedly-using-us-satellite-technologies-to-bolster-its-surveillance-capabilities Jonathan Shieber @jshieber / 6:47 PM GMT+1•April 23, 2019 China Space The Chinese government has been using a private company jointly owned by a U.S. investment firm and its Chinese counterpart to expand its surveillance and telecommunications capabilities using American technology, The Wall Street Journal reports. At the center of the Journal’s reporting is a company called Asia Satellite Telecommunications (AsiaSat). It’s a satellite operating company acquired back in 2015 by U.S. private equity firm The Carlyle Group and Chinese private equity firm CITIC Group. Both Carlyle and CITIC are known for their ties to government in their respective home nations. While the U.S. government basically bans American companies from exporting satellite technology to foreign governments like China, there have been no controls put in place on how bandwidth from launched satellites is used once those satellites are in orbit. Based in Hong Kong, AsiaSat isn’t subject to the same sort of export controls and regulations that the U.S. places on companies headquartered in mainland China, which has allowed the company to acquire U.S. satellites. The Chinese government, through its connections with CITIC, has leveraged that loophole to bolster its surveillance and telecommunications capabilities for security activities, the Journal reports. At issue are satellites bought by AsiaSat from Boeing and Maxar Technologies subsidiary SSL, of Palo Alto, Calif. We’ve reached out to Maxar and AsiaSat for comment. “Boeing follows the lead of the U.S. Government with respect to the use of export controlled items,” the company said in a statement to TechCrunch. The U.S. and China are in a highly public contest over who will control the future of networking technologies — with the U.S. accusing China’s leading commercial telecommunications vendors of collaborating with the Chinese government to spy on partners. U.S. officials also accuse their counterparts in Beijing of using physical and cyber espionage to acquire American technology. However, in this case, China was able to use corporate interests and profit-seeking to gain access to core U.S. satellite technologies, the Journal reports. Since at least 2011, CITIC has touted Chinese intelligence branches and armed services as customers of its satellite company’s services, according to the Journal’s reporting. In other marketing materials, CITIC’s satellite company has touted its link to government agencies — as a tool to link national broadcasters to far-flung towns and cities across the sprawling nation. Meanwhile, China’s Ministry of Public Security has documented how it used AsiaSat 5 — a satellite made by SSL — to develop rapid-response forces with audio and video capabilities provided in real time, the Journal is reporting. CITIC’s ownership stake in AsiaSat predates the Carlyle Group’s acquisition. The company previously was a joint venture between the Chinese private equity firm and General Electric, and its surveillance activities extend back to that period, as well. In 2008 and 2009, AsiaSat assets were used to help authorities communicate and coordinate efforts to put down antigovernment protests over religious and ethnic persecution in Tibet and Xinjiang — a mineral-rich region in Northwestern China populated mainly by an ethnic minority called Uighurs, a group comprised predominantly of practicing Muslims. In a statement provided to the Journal, AsiaSat disputed the company’s reporting, saying that the Chinese military wasn’t a direct customer, but used in a capacity for disaster relief. Several cities in the Chinese province of Sichuan were decimated by an earthquake that hit in 2008. AsiaSat also declined to comment on whether its bandwidth was being used in Xinjiang currently or whether it had been used in the Tibet and Xinjiang uprisings that occurred roughly 10 years ago. In the past few years, Chinese authorities have built a pervasive surveillance network in Xinjiang and sent as many as one million ethnic Uighurs to internment camps, according to multiple reports. In statements to The Wall Street Journal, Carlyle said that AsiaSat’s equipment supports internet and phone communications for Chinese telecommunications carriers. “It is effectively a pipe,” Carlyle said in a statement to the Journal, “and AsiaSat, because of privacy issues, doesn’t monitor or regulate the content that flows through it.”
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
US Elites Are Secretly Cooperating With China - Skull & Bones, Then and Now, Prof. Antony Sutto | (Y) | | |
China is using US satellite technologies to bolster its surveillance capabilities https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2021/02/25/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-28/ https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/23/china-is-reportedly-using-us-satellite-technologies-to-bolster-its-surveillance-capabilities Jonathan Shieber @jshieber / 6:47 PM GMT+1•April 23, 2019 China Space The Chinese government has been using a private company jointly owned by a U.S. investment firm and its Chinese counterpart to expand its surveillance and telecommunications capabilities using American technology, The Wall Street Journal reports. At the center of the Journal’s reporting is a company called Asia Satellite Telecommunications (AsiaSat). It’s a satellite operating company acquired back in 2015 by U.S. private equity firm The Carlyle Group and Chinese private equity firm CITIC Group. Both Carlyle and CITIC are known for their ties to government in their respective home nations. While the U.S. government basically bans American companies from exporting satellite technology to foreign governments like China, there have been no controls put in place on how bandwidth from launched satellites is used once those satellites are in orbit. Based in Hong Kong, AsiaSat isn’t subject to the same sort of export controls and regulations that the U.S. places on companies headquartered in mainland China, which has allowed the company to acquire U.S. satellites. The Chinese government, through its connections with CITIC, has leveraged that loophole to bolster its surveillance and telecommunications capabilities for security activities, the Journal reports. At issue are satellites bought by AsiaSat from Boeing and Maxar Technologies subsidiary SSL, of Palo Alto, Calif. We’ve reached out to Maxar and AsiaSat for comment. “Boeing follows the lead of the U.S. Government with respect to the use of export controlled items,” the company said in a statement to TechCrunch. The U.S. and China are in a highly public contest over who will control the future of networking technologies — with the U.S. accusing China’s leading commercial telecommunications vendors of collaborating with the Chinese government to spy on partners. U.S. officials also accuse their counterparts in Beijing of using physical and cyber espionage to acquire American technology. However, in this case, China was able to use corporate interests and profit-seeking to gain access to core U.S. satellite technologies, the Journal reports. Since at least 2011, CITIC has touted Chinese intelligence branches and armed services as customers of its satellite company’s services, according to the Journal’s reporting. In other marketing materials, CITIC’s satellite company has touted its link to government agencies — as a tool to link national broadcasters to far-flung towns and cities across the sprawling nation. Meanwhile, China’s Ministry of Public Security has documented how it used AsiaSat 5 — a satellite made by SSL — to develop rapid-response forces with audio and video capabilities provided in real time, the Journal is reporting. CITIC’s ownership stake in AsiaSat predates the Carlyle Group’s acquisition. The company previously was a joint venture between the Chinese private equity firm and General Electric, and its surveillance activities extend back to that period, as well. In 2008 and 2009, AsiaSat assets were used to help authorities communicate and coordinate efforts to put down antigovernment protests over religious and ethnic persecution in Tibet and Xinjiang — a mineral-rich region in Northwestern China populated mainly by an ethnic minority called Uighurs, a group comprised predominantly of practicing Muslims. In a statement provided to the Journal, AsiaSat disputed the company’s reporting, saying that the Chinese military wasn’t a direct customer, but used in a capacity for disaster relief. Several cities in the Chinese province of Sichuan were decimated by an earthquake that hit in 2008. AsiaSat also declined to comment on whether its bandwidth was being used in Xinjiang currently or whether it had been used in the Tibet and Xinjiang uprisings that occurred roughly 10 years ago. In the past few years, Chinese authorities have built a pervasive surveillance network in Xinjiang and sent as many as one million ethnic Uighurs to internment camps, according to multiple reports. In statements to The Wall Street Journal, Carlyle said that AsiaSat’s equipment supports internet and phone communications for Chinese telecommunications carriers. “It is effectively a pipe,” Carlyle said in a statement to the Journal, “and AsiaSat, because of privacy issues, doesn’t monitor or regulate the content that flows through it.”
Voir plus
2021-02-13 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 1 795 votes : 95-5 com : 27 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
WHOs Dr Evil? Gain-Of-Function Bioweapon Covid Guru Dr Peter Daszak? Investigates Himself in Wuhan! | (Y) | | |
Covid Kingpins: Evidence Dr Peter Daszak MADE Covid-19 Chimera Virus Bioweapon In Wuhan Lab Steve Hilton investigates origins of COVID-19, links to US commissioned research Jan. 25, 2021 - 15:49 - 'The Next Revolution' host breaks down the evidence surrounding the origins of COVID-19. https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2021/02/10/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-26/ A conflict of interest: How can Peter Daszak, a British scientist who helped fund controversial experiments on coronaviruses by China's Batwoman, be part of WHO’s team investigating the original source of the outbreak? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9129749/How-Peter-Daszak-WHOs-team-investigating-original-source-outbreak.html British scientist Peter Daszak’s organisation channelled cash to Wuhan scientists He has spent much of the past year trying to counter claims of a possible lab leak But he was invited by WHO to join its team of ten experts investigating outbreak By IAN BIRRELL FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY 9 January 2021 | A British scientist is facing calls to step down from two key inquiries into the origins of Covid-19 after leading the global battle to dismiss suggestions that it might have leaked from a Chinese laboratory linked to his charity. Peter Daszak’s organisation channelled cash to Wuhan scientists at the centre of growing concerns over a cover-up – and also collaborated on the sort of cutting-edge experiments on coronaviruses banned for several years in the United States for fear of sparking a pandemic. The Wuhan Institute of Virology has been carrying out this risky research on bat viruses since 2015, including the collection of new coronaviruses and hugely controversial ‘gain of function’ experiments that increase their ability to infect humans. Many leading scientists argue that deliberately creating new and infectious microbes poses a huge danger of starting a pandemic from an accidental release, especially as leaks from laboratories have often occurred. Despite his close ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology – and the way he has orchestrated efforts to stifle claims that the pandemic might not have happened naturally – Dr Daszak was invited by the World Health Organisation to join its team of ten international experts investigating the outbreak. The prominent scientist, who runs a conservation charity originally founded by the famous naturalist and best-selling author Gerald Durrell, is also leading an investigatory panel on the pandemic’s origins set up by The Lancet medical journal. ‘Peter Daszak has conflicts of interest that unequivocally disqualify him from being part of an investigation of the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic,’ said Richard Ebright, bio-security expert and professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University in New Jersey. ‘He was the contractor responsible for funding of high-risk research on Sars-related bat coronaviruses at Wuhan Institute of Virology and a collaborator on this research.’ Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, has seen his career take him from researching rare land snails at Kingston University to his new key role investigating the eruption of the most destructive pandemic for a century. The pugnacious scientist, originally from Manchester, spent much of the past year trying to counter claims of a possible laboratory leak while defending his friend Shi Zhengli, the Wuhan scientist known as Batwoman for her virus-hunting trips in caves. ‘Ignore the conspiracy theories: scientists know Covid-19 wasn’t created in a lab,’ ran the headline to one typical article he wrote in The Guardian. But other scientists say there is no firm evidence at this stage to back Daszak’s insistence that Covid-19 crossed from animals to humans via natural transmission. Many point to the simple yet startling coincidence that Wuhan is home to Asia’s main research centre on bat coronaviruses as well as the place where the pandemic erupted. Emails released through freedom of information requests have shown Daszak recruited some of the world’s top scientists to counter claims of a possible lab leak with publication of a landmark collective letter to The Lancet early last year. He drafted their statement attacking ‘conspiracy theories suggesting that Covid-19 does not have a natural origin’ and then persuaded 26 other prominent scientists to back it. He suggested the letter should not be identifiable as ‘coming from any one organisation or person’. The signatories include six of the 12-strong Lancet team investigating the cause of the outbreak. Yet it has emerged that Daszak had previously issued warnings over the dangers of sparking a global pandemic from a laboratory incident – and said the risks were greater with the sort of virus manipulation research being carried out in Wuhan....
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
WHOs Dr Evil? Gain-Of-Function Bioweapon Covid Guru Dr Peter Daszak? Investigates Himself in Wuhan! | (Y) | | |
Covid Kingpins: Evidence Dr Peter Daszak MADE Covid-19 Chimera Virus Bioweapon In Wuhan Lab Steve Hilton investigates origins of COVID-19, links to US commissioned research Jan. 25, 2021 - 15:49 - 'The Next Revolution' host breaks down the evidence surrounding the origins of COVID-19. https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2021/02/10/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-26/ A conflict of interest: How can Peter Daszak, a British scientist who helped fund controversial experiments on coronaviruses by China's Batwoman, be part of WHO’s team investigating the original source of the outbreak? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9129749/How-Peter-Daszak-WHOs-team-investigating-original-source-outbreak.html British scientist Peter Daszak’s organisation channelled cash to Wuhan scientists He has spent much of the past year trying to counter claims of a possible lab leak But he was invited by WHO to join its team of ten experts investigating outbreak By IAN BIRRELL FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY 9 January 2021 | A British scientist is facing calls to step down from two key inquiries into the origins of Covid-19 after leading the global battle to dismiss suggestions that it might have leaked from a Chinese laboratory linked to his charity. Peter Daszak’s organisation channelled cash to Wuhan scientists at the centre of growing concerns over a cover-up – and also collaborated on the sort of cutting-edge experiments on coronaviruses banned for several years in the United States for fear of sparking a pandemic. The Wuhan Institute of Virology has been carrying out this risky research on bat viruses since 2015, including the collection of new coronaviruses and hugely controversial ‘gain of function’ experiments that increase their ability to infect humans. Many leading scientists argue that deliberately creating new and infectious microbes poses a huge danger of starting a pandemic from an accidental release, especially as leaks from laboratories have often occurred. Despite his close ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology – and the way he has orchestrated efforts to stifle claims that the pandemic might not have happened naturally – Dr Daszak was invited by the World Health Organisation to join its team of ten international experts investigating the outbreak. The prominent scientist, who runs a conservation charity originally founded by the famous naturalist and best-selling author Gerald Durrell, is also leading an investigatory panel on the pandemic’s origins set up by The Lancet medical journal. ‘Peter Daszak has conflicts of interest that unequivocally disqualify him from being part of an investigation of the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic,’ said Richard Ebright, bio-security expert and professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University in New Jersey. ‘He was the contractor responsible for funding of high-risk research on Sars-related bat coronaviruses at Wuhan Institute of Virology and a collaborator on this research.’ Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, has seen his career take him from researching rare land snails at Kingston University to his new key role investigating the eruption of the most destructive pandemic for a century. The pugnacious scientist, originally from Manchester, spent much of the past year trying to counter claims of a possible laboratory leak while defending his friend Shi Zhengli, the Wuhan scientist known as Batwoman for her virus-hunting trips in caves. ‘Ignore the conspiracy theories: scientists know Covid-19 wasn’t created in a lab,’ ran the headline to one typical article he wrote in The Guardian. But other scientists say there is no firm evidence at this stage to back Daszak’s insistence that Covid-19 crossed from animals to humans via natural transmission. Many point to the simple yet startling coincidence that Wuhan is home to Asia’s main research centre on bat coronaviruses as well as the place where the pandemic erupted. Emails released through freedom of information requests have shown Daszak recruited some of the world’s top scientists to counter claims of a possible lab leak with publication of a landmark collective letter to The Lancet early last year. He drafted their statement attacking ‘conspiracy theories suggesting that Covid-19 does not have a natural origin’ and then persuaded 26 other prominent scientists to back it. He suggested the letter should not be identifiable as ‘coming from any one organisation or person’. The signatories include six of the 12-strong Lancet team investigating the cause of the outbreak. Yet it has emerged that Daszak had previously issued warnings over the dangers of sparking a global pandemic from a laboratory incident – and said the risks were greater with the sort of virus manipulation research being carried out in Wuhan....
Voir plus
2020-12-31 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 1 703 votes : 39-25 com : 30 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Debunking The Great Reset - Prof Steve Keen 2021 | (Y) | | |
Steve Keen’s Predictions for 2021 Phil Dommie - Debunking Economics Podcast https://www.patreon.com/posts/steve-keens-for-45174609 Earlier this year Phil Dobbie asked Steve keen for his predictions for 2020. Without a whiff of COVID -19 IN THE AIR, Steve talked of a capitalist economy on government life support. On that he was pretty much on the mark. So what of 2021. In this free edition of the Debunking Economics podcast he explains the reasoning behind his five predictions for the year ahead: 1. Recession in Europe and America as financial aftermath to the COVID crisis. 2. The housing bubble to continue in Australia., but maybe not in Canada. 3. Strong growth in China. 4. A rapid fall in coal mining 5. Severe weather crises in Europe and USA from collapse of Arctic winter sea ice Phil tries hard to accentuate the positive in Steve’s predictions, but fails miserably. It’s all doom and gloom!
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Debunking The Great Reset - Prof Steve Keen 2021 | (Y) | | |
Steve Keen’s Predictions for 2021 Phil Dommie - Debunking Economics Podcast https://www.patreon.com/posts/steve-keens-for-45174609 Earlier this year Phil Dobbie asked Steve keen for his predictions for 2020. Without a whiff of COVID -19 IN THE AIR, Steve talked of a capitalist economy on government life support. On that he was pretty much on the mark. So what of 2021. In this free edition of the Debunking Economics podcast he explains the reasoning behind his five predictions for the year ahead: 1. Recession in Europe and America as financial aftermath to the COVID crisis. 2. The housing bubble to continue in Australia., but maybe not in Canada. 3. Strong growth in China. 4. A rapid fall in coal mining 5. Severe weather crises in Europe and USA from collapse of Arctic winter sea ice Phil tries hard to accentuate the positive in Steve’s predictions, but fails miserably. It’s all doom and gloom!
Voir plus
2020-12-31 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 433 votes : 20-2 com : 10 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Trump Pardons US Blackwater Mercenaries Responsible For 2007 Massacre Of 17 Unarmed Iraqis | (Y) | | |
UN rights experts slam Trump's pardoning of U S contractors implicated in Iraq killing 5:30 - Skip to Tony https://youtu.be/RBgfMUFgcP4?t=319 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-blackwater-pardon-iraq-un-us-b1780353.html ‘Affront to justice’: UN condemns Trump’s pardon of Blackwater guards who massacred Iraq civilians Human rights experts say move violates US obligations under international law Emily Goddard @emilysgoddard 21 hours ago Donald Trump’s pardon of four American security guards convicted of killing Iraqi civilians, including two children, in Baghdad in 2007 was “an affront to justice”, United Nations human rights experts have said. Nicholas Slatten was convicted of first-degree murder, while Paul Slough, Evan Liberty and Dustin Heard were convicted of voluntary and attempted manslaughter, over the massacre in which US contractors opened fire with machine-guns, grenade launchers and a sniper on a busy square in the Iraqi capital, killing 14 unarmed Iraqi civilians. The four contractors, who worked for the private security firm Blackwater, owned by the brother of the president’s education secretary, were included in a wave of pre-Christmas pardons announced by the White House. Mohammed Kinani, the father of the youngest victim, nine-year-old Ali, said Mr Trump “broke my life again” on learning of the pardons. Experts from the UN have now said the move by the outgoing president violated US obligations under international law. “Pardoning the Blackwater contractors is an affront to justice and to the victims of the Nisour Square massacre and their families,” Jelena Aparac, the chair of the UN working group on the use of mercenaries, said in a statement. The Geneva Conventions oblige states to hold war criminals accountable for their crimes, even when they act as private security contractors, the UN experts said. “These pardons violate US obligations under international law and more broadly undermine humanitarian law and human rights at a global level.” By allowing private security contractors to “operate with impunity in armed conflicts”, states will be emboldened to circumvent their obligations under humanitarian law, they said. General David Petraeus and Ryan Crocker, respectively commander of US forces and US ambassador in Iraq at the time of the incident, described Mr Trump’s pardons as “hugely damaging, an action that tells the world that Americans abroad can commit the most heinous crimes with impunity”. In a statement announcing the pardons, the White House said the move was “broadly supported by the public” and backed by a number of Republican lawmakers.
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Trump Pardons US Blackwater Mercenaries Responsible For 2007 Massacre Of 17 Unarmed Iraqis | (Y) | | |
UN rights experts slam Trump's pardoning of U S contractors implicated in Iraq killing 5:30 - Skip to Tony https://youtu.be/RBgfMUFgcP4?t=319 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-blackwater-pardon-iraq-un-us-b1780353.html ‘Affront to justice’: UN condemns Trump’s pardon of Blackwater guards who massacred Iraq civilians Human rights experts say move violates US obligations under international law Emily Goddard @emilysgoddard 21 hours ago Donald Trump’s pardon of four American security guards convicted of killing Iraqi civilians, including two children, in Baghdad in 2007 was “an affront to justice”, United Nations human rights experts have said. Nicholas Slatten was convicted of first-degree murder, while Paul Slough, Evan Liberty and Dustin Heard were convicted of voluntary and attempted manslaughter, over the massacre in which US contractors opened fire with machine-guns, grenade launchers and a sniper on a busy square in the Iraqi capital, killing 14 unarmed Iraqi civilians. The four contractors, who worked for the private security firm Blackwater, owned by the brother of the president’s education secretary, were included in a wave of pre-Christmas pardons announced by the White House. Mohammed Kinani, the father of the youngest victim, nine-year-old Ali, said Mr Trump “broke my life again” on learning of the pardons. Experts from the UN have now said the move by the outgoing president violated US obligations under international law. “Pardoning the Blackwater contractors is an affront to justice and to the victims of the Nisour Square massacre and their families,” Jelena Aparac, the chair of the UN working group on the use of mercenaries, said in a statement. The Geneva Conventions oblige states to hold war criminals accountable for their crimes, even when they act as private security contractors, the UN experts said. “These pardons violate US obligations under international law and more broadly undermine humanitarian law and human rights at a global level.” By allowing private security contractors to “operate with impunity in armed conflicts”, states will be emboldened to circumvent their obligations under humanitarian law, they said. General David Petraeus and Ryan Crocker, respectively commander of US forces and US ambassador in Iraq at the time of the incident, described Mr Trump’s pardons as “hugely damaging, an action that tells the world that Americans abroad can commit the most heinous crimes with impunity”. In a statement announcing the pardons, the White House said the move was “broadly supported by the public” and backed by a number of Republican lawmakers.
Voir plus
2020-12-28 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 1 367 votes : 57-20 com : 60 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Bill Gates' 2020 Christmas Message: The Magical Vaccine | (Y) | | |
Bill Gates' Christmas Message 2020 In conversation with BBC's Tim Harford How To Vaccinate The World 28 Dec 2020 Robert F Kennedy Jr. On Bill Gates’ Messiah Complex Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. is an American environmental attorney, author, and opponent of vaccination. Kennedy is a son of Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of former president John F. Kennedy. He is the president of the board of Waterkeeper Alliance, a non-profit environmental group that he helped found in 1999. #Vaccines, for #BillGates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including #Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy—the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism. Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans. Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines. In 2014, the #GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court. In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children. During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers” Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philantropic practices as “ruthless” and “immoral”. In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP is killing more African than the disease it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children. Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually. Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe. In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance. In this recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children. https://fort-russ.com/2020/04/robert-f-kennedy-jr-exposes-bill-gates-vaccine-dictatorship-plan-cites-gates-twisted-messiah-complex/
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Bill Gates' 2020 Christmas Message: The Magical Vaccine | (Y) | | |
Bill Gates' Christmas Message 2020 In conversation with BBC's Tim Harford How To Vaccinate The World 28 Dec 2020 Robert F Kennedy Jr. On Bill Gates’ Messiah Complex Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. is an American environmental attorney, author, and opponent of vaccination. Kennedy is a son of Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of former president John F. Kennedy. He is the president of the board of Waterkeeper Alliance, a non-profit environmental group that he helped found in 1999. #Vaccines, for #BillGates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses (including #Microsoft’s ambition to control a global vac ID enterprise) and give him dictatorial control over global health policy—the spear tip of corporate neo-imperialism. Gates’ obsession with vaccines seems fueled by a messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology and a god-like willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans. Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India ‘s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines. In 2014, the #GatesFoundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by GSK and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls. The case is now in the country’s Supreme Court. In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a trial of a GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions to 1,048 of the 5,049 children. During Gates 2002 MenAfriVac Campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. Between 50-500 children developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for drug makers” Nelson Mandela’s former Senior Economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philantropic practices as “ruthless” and “immoral”. In 2010, Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO promising to reduce population, in part, through new vaccines. A month later Gates told a Ted Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population”. In 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a phony “tetanus” vaccine campaign. Independent labs found the sterility formula in every vaccine tested. After denying the charges, WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade. Similar accusations came from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. A 2017 study (Morgensen et.Al.2017) showed that WHO’s popular DTP is killing more African than the disease it pretends to prevent. Vaccinated girls suffered 10x the death rate of unvaccinated children. Gates and the WHO refused to recall the lethal vaccine which WHO forces upon millions of African children annually. Global public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of – hijacking WHO’s agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases; clean water, hygiene, nutrition and economic development. They say he has diverted agency resources to serve his personal fetish – that good health only comes in a syringe. In addition to using his philanthropy to control WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and PATH, Gates funds private pharmaceutical companies that manufacture vaccines, and a massive network of pharmaceutical industry front groups that broadcast deceptive propaganda, develop fraudulent studies, conduct surveillance and psychological operations against vaccine hesitancy and use Gates’ power and money to silence dissent and coerce compliance. In this recent nonstop Pharmedia appearances, Gates appears gleeful that the Covid-19 crisis will give him the opportunity to force his third-world vaccine programs on American children. https://fort-russ.com/2020/04/robert-f-kennedy-jr-exposes-bill-gates-vaccine-dictatorship-plan-cites-gates-twisted-messiah-complex/
Voir plus
2020-12-27 | HORS-SUJET | 
vus : 1 081 votes : 83-3 com : 15 (en-GB)
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Muslim Eschatology: David Livingstone Revelation, Blueprint For The New World Order (Dec 2020) | (Y) | | |
David Livingstone: Revelation NWO Blueprint - Eschatology 2020 Dajallic NWO Revelation David Livingstone, Dr Vernon Coleman, Tony Gosling NOT The BCfm Politics Show thisweek.org.uk 18 Dec 2020 https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2020/12/17/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-20/ WEF even promotes the concept that by 2030 we will own nothing. If digital really is the answer to our problems, why are we facing mass unemployment? Technology can be part of the solution, but not if it creates yet more problems. Furthermore, the World Economic Forum’s plan is to replace free enterprise with only those businesses that conform to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of England and now climate change ambassador, has made it clear that businesses will be denied loans if they do not meet zero carbon criteria. While reducing carbon may be a welcome as a means of lowering pollution, it is not a realistic objective in helping the economy to get back on its feet. We have already suffered too much as a country from a cure that is worse than the disease. We do not need the further indignities that technocracy imposes on us. It is even leaving a permanent scar on the landscape where cities such as Sheffield have had trees removed so that the technology microwave grid can function better. Christian Muslim Jewish Eschatology seminar 2020 - David Livingstone on the hidden history of the Occult - now coming into the open after 1700 years of secrecy - at the Eschatology 2020 'Dajallic New World Order Global Vision 2000 seminar [ full video ] - Despite claiming to be a “born again” Christian, Reagan and his wife Nancy had a devoted interest in astrology. Astrologer Joan Quigley was called on by Mrs. Reagan in 1981 after John Hinckley’s attempted assassination of the president. Interestingly, Hinckley was later confined to St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington DC which, as Colin Ross explained in The CIA Doctors, Dr. Winfred Overholser Sr. funded LSD research through the Scottish Rite Committee and was at the center of the MK-Ultra mind control network.[2] Quigley stayed on as the White House astrologer in secret until being outed in 1988 by ousted former chief of staff Donald Regan. Joan Quigley discussed her relationship with Nancy Reagan in a book, titled What Does Joan Say? and boasted, “Not since the days of the Roman emperors—and never in the history of the United States Presidency—has an astrologer played such a significant role in the nation’s affairs of State.” As Regan explained: Virtually every major move and decision the Reagans made during my time as White House Chief of Staff was cleared in advance with a woman in San Francisco [Quigley] who drew up horoscopes to make certain that the planets were in a favorable alignment for the enterprise.[3]
Public Enquiry | (Y) | (Ajax)
Muslim Eschatology: David Livingstone Revelation, Blueprint For The New World Order (Dec 2020) | (Y) | | |
David Livingstone: Revelation NWO Blueprint - Eschatology 2020 Dajallic NWO Revelation David Livingstone, Dr Vernon Coleman, Tony Gosling NOT The BCfm Politics Show thisweek.org.uk 18 Dec 2020 https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2020/12/17/not-the-bcfm-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-20/ WEF even promotes the concept that by 2030 we will own nothing. If digital really is the answer to our problems, why are we facing mass unemployment? Technology can be part of the solution, but not if it creates yet more problems. Furthermore, the World Economic Forum’s plan is to replace free enterprise with only those businesses that conform to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of England and now climate change ambassador, has made it clear that businesses will be denied loans if they do not meet zero carbon criteria. While reducing carbon may be a welcome as a means of lowering pollution, it is not a realistic objective in helping the economy to get back on its feet. We have already suffered too much as a country from a cure that is worse than the disease. We do not need the further indignities that technocracy imposes on us. It is even leaving a permanent scar on the landscape where cities such as Sheffield have had trees removed so that the technology microwave grid can function better. Christian Muslim Jewish Eschatology seminar 2020 - David Livingstone on the hidden history of the Occult - now coming into the open after 1700 years of secrecy - at the Eschatology 2020 'Dajallic New World Order Global Vision 2000 seminar [ full video ] - Despite claiming to be a “born again” Christian, Reagan and his wife Nancy had a devoted interest in astrology. Astrologer Joan Quigley was called on by Mrs. Reagan in 1981 after John Hinckley’s attempted assassination of the president. Interestingly, Hinckley was later confined to St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Washington DC which, as Colin Ross explained in The CIA Doctors, Dr. Winfred Overholser Sr. funded LSD research through the Scottish Rite Committee and was at the center of the MK-Ultra mind control network.[2] Quigley stayed on as the White House astrologer in secret until being outed in 1988 by ousted former chief of staff Donald Regan. Joan Quigley discussed her relationship with Nancy Reagan in a book, titled What Does Joan Say? and boasted, “Not since the days of the Roman emperors—and never in the history of the United States Presidency—has an astrologer played such a significant role in the nation’s affairs of State.” As Regan explained: Virtually every major move and decision the Reagans made during my time as White House Chief of Staff was cleared in advance with a woman in San Francisco [Quigley] who drew up horoscopes to make certain that the planets were in a favorable alignment for the enterprise.[3]
Voir plus
Page 1 | Suivant